• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国成年人对维持生命治疗的偏好:一项横断面研究。

Preferences for life-sustaining treatment in Korean adults: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, The Republic of Korea.

Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University, Gunpo, The Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 22;11(1):e039470. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039470.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039470
PMID:33483437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7831737/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Life-sustaining treatment is any treatment that serves to prolong life without reversing the underlying medical conditions, and includes cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, haemodialysis and left ventricular assist devices. This study aimed to investigate the thoughts on life-sustaining treatment of Koreans and to assess the factors associated with deciding to not receive life-sustaining treatment if they develop a terminal disease.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Guro-gu centre for dementia from 1 May 2018 to 31 December 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, 150 individuals participated in this study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The questionnaire consisted of self-report items with some instructions, demographic characteristics, thoughts on life-sustaining treatment and psychosocial scales. The preferences of the participants were investigated on the assumption that they develop terminal cancer. The psychosocial scales included the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS).

RESULTS

We classified our participants into two groups: individuals who wanted to receive life-sustaining treatment (IRLT) and individuals who wanted to not receive life-sustaining treatment (INLT). There were twice as many participants in the INLT group than there were in the IRLT. In making this decision, the INLT group focused more on physical and mental distress. Additionally, 32.7% of participants responded that terminal status was an optimal time for this decision, but more participants want to decide it earlier. The GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores were significantly higher in the INLT group than in the IRLT group. However, the INLT group had significantly lower MSPSS family scores.

CONCLUSION

Our findings can help assess issues regarding advance directives and life-sustaining treatment, and will be a reference for designing future studies on this issue.

摘要

目的

维持生命的治疗是指任何旨在延长生命而不逆转潜在疾病状况的治疗,包括心肺复苏、机械通气、血液透析和左心室辅助装置。本研究旨在调查韩国人对维持生命治疗的想法,并评估如果他们患有终末期疾病,决定不接受维持生命治疗的相关因素。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

2018 年 5 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日,位于古尔古区的痴呆症中心。

参与者

共有 150 人参与了这项研究。

结果测量

问卷包括自我报告项目和一些说明,人口统计学特征,维持生命治疗的想法和社会心理量表。假设参与者患有晚期癌症,对他们的偏好进行了调查。社会心理量表包括广泛性焦虑障碍-7 量表(GAD-7)、患者健康问卷-9 量表(PHQ-9)、Connor-Davidson 韧性量表和多维感知社会支持量表(MSPSS)。

结果

我们将参与者分为两组:想要接受维持生命治疗的组(IRLT)和不想接受维持生命治疗的组(INLT)。INLT 组的参与者人数是 IRLT 组的两倍。在做出这一决定时,INLT 组更关注身体和精神痛苦。此外,32.7%的参与者认为终末期是做出这一决定的最佳时机,但更多的参与者希望更早做出决定。INLT 组的 GAD-7 和 PHQ-9 评分明显高于 IRLT 组。然而,INLT 组的 MSPSS 家庭评分明显较低。

结论

我们的研究结果可以帮助评估关于预先指示和维持生命治疗的问题,并为设计关于这一问题的未来研究提供参考。

相似文献

1
Preferences for life-sustaining treatment in Korean adults: a cross-sectional study.韩国成年人对维持生命治疗的偏好:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 22;11(1):e039470. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039470.
2
Psychosocial Factors Associated With Thoughts Regarding Life-Sustaining Treatment for Oneself and Family Members.与对自己及家庭成员维持生命治疗的想法相关的社会心理因素
Psychiatry Investig. 2024 Jun;21(6):646-654. doi: 10.30773/pi.2024.0032. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
3
Long-term care facility policies on life-sustaining treatments and advance directives in Canada.加拿大长期护理机构关于维持生命治疗和预先指示的政策。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Nov;42(11):1150-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06980.x.
4
Novel legislation for pediatric advance directives: surveys and focus groups capture parent and clinician perspectives.关于儿科预先指示的新立法:调查和焦点小组收集了家长和临床医生的观点。
Palliat Med. 2015 Apr;29(4):346-53. doi: 10.1177/0269216315571020. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
5
Completion rate of physician orders for life-sustaining treatment for patients with metastatic or recurrent cancer: a preliminary, cross-sectional study.转移性或复发性癌症患者生命维持治疗医嘱完成率:初步的横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Oct 22;18(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0475-9.
6
Insight into advance care planning for patients on dialysis.透析患者的预先护理计划。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Jan;45(1):104-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
7
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Preferences of Advance Decisions, End-of-Life Care, and Place of Care and Death in Hong Kong. A Population-Based Telephone Survey of 1067 Adults.香港成人 1067 名的基于人口的电话调查:预先指示、临终关怀、护理和死亡地点的知识、态度和偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;18(4):367.e19-367.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.066. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
8
Life-sustaining treatment decisions for nursing home residents: who discusses, who decides and what is decided?养老院居民维持生命治疗的决策:谁参与讨论、谁做出决定以及决定了什么?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Jan;47(1):82-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01905.x.
9
Physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST): outcomes in a PACE program. Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly.医生下达的维持生命治疗医嘱(POLST):老年医保全包项目的结果。老年医保全包项目
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Oct;48(10):1219-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb02594.x.
10
Context changes choices: a prospective study of the effects of hospitalization on life-sustaining treatment preferences.环境变化会改变选择:一项关于住院治疗对维持生命治疗偏好影响的前瞻性研究。
Med Decis Making. 2006 Jul-Aug;26(4):313-22. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06290494.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of withholding and withdrawal life-sustaining treatment issues on patients with sepsis: a prospective, nationwide, multicenter cohort study.停止和撤销维持生命治疗问题对脓毒症患者的影响:一项前瞻性、全国性、多中心队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):15249. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98584-x.

本文引用的文献

1
So Help Me, God: Religiosity and End-of-Life Choices in a Nationally Representative Sample.《天助吾愿:全国代表性样本中的宗教信仰与临终选择》。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Apr;23(4):563-567. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0209. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
2
[Reversals in Decisions about Life-Sustaining Treatment and Associated Factors among Older Patients with Terminal Stage of Cardiopulmonary Disease].[晚期心肺疾病老年患者维持生命治疗决策的逆转及相关因素]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2019 Jun;49(3):329-339. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2019.49.3.329.
3
The Korean-Advance Directive Model and Factors Associated With Its Completion Among Patients With Hematologic Disorders.韩国预立医疗指示模式及其在血液系统疾病患者中完成情况的相关因素。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2019 Aug;21(4):E10-E16. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000522.
4
Correlates of advance directive treatment preferences among community-dwelling older people with chronic diseases.社区居住的慢性病老年患者预先指示治疗偏好的相关因素。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2019 Jun;14(2):e12229. doi: 10.1111/opn.12229. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
5
Major Depressive Disorder in Medical Illness: A Review of Assessment, Prevalence, and Treatment Options.医学疾病中的重度抑郁症:评估、患病率和治疗选择的综述。
Psychosom Med. 2019 Apr;81(3):246-255. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000678.
6
Advance Directives, Medical Conditions, and Preferences for End-of-Life Care Among Physicians: 12-year Follow-Up of the Johns Hopkins Precursors Study.预立医疗指示、医疗状况和医生对临终关怀的偏好:约翰霍普金斯先驱研究的 12 年随访。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Mar;57(3):556-565. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.328. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
7
Factors Predisposing Terminally Ill Cancer Patients' Preferences for Distinct Patterns/States of Life-Sustaining Treatments Over Their Last Six Months.影响终末期癌症患者在生命维持治疗的不同模式/状态偏好的因素:终末期患者在过去六个月的情况。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Feb;57(2):190-198.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
8
Comparison of attitudes towards five end-of-life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population.对五种临终关怀干预措施(积极控制疼痛、撤销无效的维持生命治疗、被动安乐死、主动安乐死和医生协助自杀)的态度比较:对韩国癌症患者、其家庭护理人员、医生及韩国普通民众的多中心横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 11;8(9):e020519. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020519.
9
Feasibility of the Korean-Advance Directives Among Community-Dwelling Elderly Persons.韩国预立医疗指示在社区老年人中的可行性。
Holist Nurs Pract. 2017 Jul/Aug;31(4):234-242. doi: 10.1097/HNP.0000000000000216.
10
End-of-life care decisions using a Korean advance directive among cancer patient-caregiver dyads.癌症患者-照顾者二元组中使用韩国预先指示进行的临终护理决策。
Palliat Support Care. 2017 Feb;15(1):77-87. doi: 10.1017/S1478951516000808. Epub 2016 Nov 2.