文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

韩国成年人对维持生命治疗的偏好:一项横断面研究。

Preferences for life-sustaining treatment in Korean adults: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, The Republic of Korea.

Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University, Gunpo, The Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 22;11(1):e039470. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039470.


DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039470
PMID:33483437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7831737/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Life-sustaining treatment is any treatment that serves to prolong life without reversing the underlying medical conditions, and includes cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, haemodialysis and left ventricular assist devices. This study aimed to investigate the thoughts on life-sustaining treatment of Koreans and to assess the factors associated with deciding to not receive life-sustaining treatment if they develop a terminal disease. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Guro-gu centre for dementia from 1 May 2018 to 31 December 2019. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 150 individuals participated in this study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The questionnaire consisted of self-report items with some instructions, demographic characteristics, thoughts on life-sustaining treatment and psychosocial scales. The preferences of the participants were investigated on the assumption that they develop terminal cancer. The psychosocial scales included the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). RESULTS: We classified our participants into two groups: individuals who wanted to receive life-sustaining treatment (IRLT) and individuals who wanted to not receive life-sustaining treatment (INLT). There were twice as many participants in the INLT group than there were in the IRLT. In making this decision, the INLT group focused more on physical and mental distress. Additionally, 32.7% of participants responded that terminal status was an optimal time for this decision, but more participants want to decide it earlier. The GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores were significantly higher in the INLT group than in the IRLT group. However, the INLT group had significantly lower MSPSS family scores. CONCLUSION: Our findings can help assess issues regarding advance directives and life-sustaining treatment, and will be a reference for designing future studies on this issue.

摘要

目的:维持生命的治疗是指任何旨在延长生命而不逆转潜在疾病状况的治疗,包括心肺复苏、机械通气、血液透析和左心室辅助装置。本研究旨在调查韩国人对维持生命治疗的想法,并评估如果他们患有终末期疾病,决定不接受维持生命治疗的相关因素。

设计:横断面研究。

地点:2018 年 5 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日,位于古尔古区的痴呆症中心。

参与者:共有 150 人参与了这项研究。

结果测量:问卷包括自我报告项目和一些说明,人口统计学特征,维持生命治疗的想法和社会心理量表。假设参与者患有晚期癌症,对他们的偏好进行了调查。社会心理量表包括广泛性焦虑障碍-7 量表(GAD-7)、患者健康问卷-9 量表(PHQ-9)、Connor-Davidson 韧性量表和多维感知社会支持量表(MSPSS)。

结果:我们将参与者分为两组:想要接受维持生命治疗的组(IRLT)和不想接受维持生命治疗的组(INLT)。INLT 组的参与者人数是 IRLT 组的两倍。在做出这一决定时,INLT 组更关注身体和精神痛苦。此外,32.7%的参与者认为终末期是做出这一决定的最佳时机,但更多的参与者希望更早做出决定。INLT 组的 GAD-7 和 PHQ-9 评分明显高于 IRLT 组。然而,INLT 组的 MSPSS 家庭评分明显较低。

结论:我们的研究结果可以帮助评估关于预先指示和维持生命治疗的问题,并为设计关于这一问题的未来研究提供参考。

相似文献

[1]
Preferences for life-sustaining treatment in Korean adults: a cross-sectional study.

BMJ Open. 2021-1-22

[2]
Psychosocial Factors Associated With Thoughts Regarding Life-Sustaining Treatment for Oneself and Family Members.

Psychiatry Investig. 2024-6

[3]
Long-term care facility policies on life-sustaining treatments and advance directives in Canada.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994-11

[4]
Novel legislation for pediatric advance directives: surveys and focus groups capture parent and clinician perspectives.

Palliat Med. 2015-4

[5]
Completion rate of physician orders for life-sustaining treatment for patients with metastatic or recurrent cancer: a preliminary, cross-sectional study.

BMC Palliat Care. 2019-10-22

[6]
Insight into advance care planning for patients on dialysis.

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012-7-26

[7]
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Preferences of Advance Decisions, End-of-Life Care, and Place of Care and Death in Hong Kong. A Population-Based Telephone Survey of 1067 Adults.

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017-2-14

[8]
Life-sustaining treatment decisions for nursing home residents: who discusses, who decides and what is decided?

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999-1

[9]
Physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST): outcomes in a PACE program. Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000-10

[10]
Context changes choices: a prospective study of the effects of hospitalization on life-sustaining treatment preferences.

Med Decis Making. 2006

引用本文的文献

[1]
The impact of withholding and withdrawal life-sustaining treatment issues on patients with sepsis: a prospective, nationwide, multicenter cohort study.

Sci Rep. 2025-4-30

本文引用的文献

[1]
So Help Me, God: Religiosity and End-of-Life Choices in a Nationally Representative Sample.

J Palliat Med. 2020-4

[2]
[Reversals in Decisions about Life-Sustaining Treatment and Associated Factors among Older Patients with Terminal Stage of Cardiopulmonary Disease].

J Korean Acad Nurs. 2019-6

[3]
The Korean-Advance Directive Model and Factors Associated With Its Completion Among Patients With Hematologic Disorders.

J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2019-8

[4]
Correlates of advance directive treatment preferences among community-dwelling older people with chronic diseases.

Int J Older People Nurs. 2019-3-1

[5]
Major Depressive Disorder in Medical Illness: A Review of Assessment, Prevalence, and Treatment Options.

Psychosom Med. 2019-4

[6]
Advance Directives, Medical Conditions, and Preferences for End-of-Life Care Among Physicians: 12-year Follow-Up of the Johns Hopkins Precursors Study.

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018-12-19

[7]
Factors Predisposing Terminally Ill Cancer Patients' Preferences for Distinct Patterns/States of Life-Sustaining Treatments Over Their Last Six Months.

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018-11-15

[8]
Comparison of attitudes towards five end-of-life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population.

BMJ Open. 2018-9-11

[9]
Feasibility of the Korean-Advance Directives Among Community-Dwelling Elderly Persons.

Holist Nurs Pract. 2017

[10]
End-of-life care decisions using a Korean advance directive among cancer patient-caregiver dyads.

Palliat Support Care. 2017-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索