Department of Psychology, City College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
, Clinton, CT, USA.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Feb;50(1):143-153. doi: 10.1007/s10936-021-09768-1. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
Over the past two decades, therapeutic alliance research has increasingly focused on understanding the process by which the alliance is ruptured and repaired. This paper is the first to explore how alliance rupture segments from psychotherapy sessions differ from non-rupture segments on key dimensions of the referential process. A sample of 27 psychotherapy sessions were scored using a measure designed to identify rupture from non-rupture segments. These segments were then scored for key linguistic dimensions of the referential process. During ruptures patients manifested a referential process marked by a decrease in emotional engagement, an increase in a measure of distancing, and an increase in negation as compared to non-rupture segments. Therapists show similar patterns but, in addition, manifest a language pattern that suggests that during ruptures, therapists are attempting to make sense of, and self-disclose, aspects of their inner experience. Implications for research and clinical work are explored.
在过去的二十年中,治疗联盟研究越来越关注理解联盟破裂和修复的过程。本文首次探讨了从心理治疗会谈中破裂的联盟片段与非破裂片段在参考过程的关键维度上的差异。使用旨在识别破裂与非破裂片段的测量方法对 27 次心理治疗会谈的样本进行评分。然后,对参考过程的关键语言维度对这些片段进行评分。在破裂期间,与非破裂片段相比,患者表现出的参考过程的特点是情感投入减少,距离感增加,以及否定增加。治疗师表现出类似的模式,但除此之外,还表现出一种语言模式,表明在破裂期间,治疗师试图理解和自我揭示其内在体验的某些方面。探讨了对研究和临床工作的影响。