School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;151:105990. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105990. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
Despite many studies on exploring the behaviors of pedestrians crossing the road, there is a need for comprehensive studies that identify the factors that may influence pedestrians crossing behavior at signalized and unsignalized intersections. This study aims to comprehensively examine the influence of gender, age group, group-crossing, technological devices and carrying items on pedestrians crossing behaviors at signalized and unsignalized crosswalks simultaneously. Observational data of 552 pedestrians at two signalized and two unsignalized crosswalks in Tehran were collected. Temporal and spatial violations, conflict experience and collision avoidance, situational awareness, and pedestrians crossing speed were used as pedestrians crossing behaviors indicators. To model crossing behaviors, linear mixed models (LMMs) and Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) with fixed-effect approach were applied for the continuous outcome (pedestrians' crossing speed) and binary outcomes, respectively. Phi and Cramer's V coefficients were used to avoid multicollinearity. Results showed that traffic checks before and while crossing showed a high positive correlation with crossing at "don't walk" and flashing "don't walk" signals and conflict experience at signalized crosswalks. As compared to females, males started their crossing more on flashing "don't walk" signal and crossed the crosswalk faster. Older pedestrians exhibited more cautious behaviors at signalized intersections but less in unsignalized intersections. Alone pedestrians behaved more cautiously than groups and crossed the crosswalk more quickly. Using technological devices, regardless of their types, caused pedestrians to not exhibit one or more safe crossing indicators considered in this study. Pedestrians talking on their phones had the least cautious behaviors. Pedestrians listening to music mostly looked at the ground or straight direction rather than looking left-right for traffic. The findings from this study are a valuable resource to road authorities and policy makers to develop appropriate targeted strategies to prevent pedestrians' injuries and fatalities and improve crosswalks safety.
尽管有许多研究探讨了行人过马路的行为,但仍需要进行全面的研究,以确定可能影响信号灯和无信号灯交叉路口行人过马路行为的因素。本研究旨在综合考察性别、年龄组、群体穿越、技术设备和携带物品对信号灯和无信号灯行人穿越行为的影响。在德黑兰的两个信号灯和两个无信号灯的路口收集了 552 名行人的观测数据。时间和空间违规、冲突经历和避免碰撞、情境意识以及行人穿越速度被用作行人穿越行为的指标。为了对行人的穿越行为进行建模,线性混合模型(LMMs)和广义线性混合模型(GLMMs)分别采用固定效应方法应用于连续结果(行人穿越速度)和二项结果。Phi 和 Cramer 的 V 系数用于避免多重共线性。结果表明,在穿越前和穿越过程中进行交通检查与在“不要行走”和闪烁“不要行走”信号下的穿越以及在信号灯交叉路口的冲突经历呈高度正相关。与女性相比,男性在闪烁“不要行走”信号时开始穿越的速度更快,穿越速度也更快。年龄较大的行人在信号灯交叉口表现出更谨慎的行为,但在无信号灯交叉口则较少。单独的行人比群体更谨慎,穿越速度也更快。使用技术设备,无论其类型如何,都会导致行人无法表现出本研究中考虑的一个或多个安全穿越指标。行人在打电话时表现出的行为最不谨慎。行人听音乐时大多看向地面或正前方,而不是左右看交通情况。本研究的结果为道路管理部门和决策者提供了有价值的资源,以制定适当的有针对性的策略,预防行人受伤和死亡,提高交叉口的安全性。