Department of Radiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1740 West Taylor Street, MC 931, Chicago, IL, 60612.
University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Feb;32(2):282-291.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.10.009.
To compare the safety and clinical outcomes of combined transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) plus variceal obliteration to those of TIPS alone for the treatment of gastric varices (GVs).
A single-center, retrospective study of 40 patients with bleeding or high-risk GVs between 2008 and 2019 was performed. The patients were treated with combined therapy (n = 18) or TIPS alone (n = 22). There were no significant differences in age, sex, model for end-stage liver disease score, or GV type between the groups. The primary outcomes were the rates of GV eradication and rebleeding. The secondary outcomes included portal hypertensive complications and hepatic encephalopathy.
The mean follow-up period was 15.4 months for the combined therapy group and 22.9 months for the TIPS group (P = .32). After combined therapy, there was a higher rate of GV eradication (92% vs 47%, P = .01) and a trend toward a lower rate of GV rebleeding (0% vs 23%, P = .056). The estimated rebleeding rates were 0% versus 5% at 3 months, 0% versus 11% at 6 months, 0% versus 18% at 1 year, and 0% versus 38% at 2 years after combined therapy and TIPS, respectively (P = .077). There was no difference in ascites (13% vs 11%, P = .63), hepatic encephalopathy (47% vs 55%, P = .44), or esophageal variceal bleeding (0% vs 0%, P > .999) after the procedure between the groups.
The GV eradication rate is significantly higher after combined therapy, with no associated increase in portal hypertensive complications. This translates to a clinically meaningful trend toward a reduction in GV rebleeding. The value of a combined treatment strategy should be prospectively studied in a larger cohort to determine the optimal management of GVs.
比较联合经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)加曲张静脉闭塞术与单纯 TIPS 治疗胃静脉曲张(GVs)的安全性和临床结局。
对 2008 年至 2019 年间因出血或高危 GVs 接受治疗的 40 例患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。这些患者接受了联合治疗(n=18)或单纯 TIPS 治疗(n=22)。两组在年龄、性别、终末期肝病模型评分或 GV 类型方面无显著差异。主要结局是 GV 消除率和再出血率。次要结局包括门脉高压并发症和肝性脑病。
联合治疗组的平均随访时间为 15.4 个月,TIPS 组为 22.9 个月(P=0.32)。联合治疗后,GV 消除率更高(92%比 47%,P=0.01),GV 再出血率有降低趋势(0%比 23%,P=0.056)。联合治疗和 TIPS 治疗后 3 个月的估计再出血率分别为 0%比 5%,6 个月分别为 0%比 11%,1 年分别为 0%比 18%,2 年分别为 0%比 38%(P=0.077)。术后两组腹水(13%比 11%,P=0.63)、肝性脑病(47%比 55%,P=0.44)或食管静脉曲张出血(0%比 0%,P>0.999)发生率无差异。
联合治疗后 GV 消除率显著提高,而门脉高压并发症无增加。这意味着 GV 再出血率有显著降低的临床意义趋势。联合治疗策略的价值应在更大的队列中进行前瞻性研究,以确定 GVs 的最佳治疗方法。