• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术联合胃静脉曲张结扎术与单纯经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗胃静脉曲张的对比:单中心临床结局比较。

Combined Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Plus Variceal Obliteration versus Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Alone for the Management of Gastric Varices: Comparative Single-Center Clinical Outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1740 West Taylor Street, MC 931, Chicago, IL, 60612.

University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Feb;32(2):282-291.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.10.009.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2020.10.009
PMID:33485506
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and clinical outcomes of combined transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) plus variceal obliteration to those of TIPS alone for the treatment of gastric varices (GVs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center, retrospective study of 40 patients with bleeding or high-risk GVs between 2008 and 2019 was performed. The patients were treated with combined therapy (n = 18) or TIPS alone (n = 22). There were no significant differences in age, sex, model for end-stage liver disease score, or GV type between the groups. The primary outcomes were the rates of GV eradication and rebleeding. The secondary outcomes included portal hypertensive complications and hepatic encephalopathy.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 15.4 months for the combined therapy group and 22.9 months for the TIPS group (P = .32). After combined therapy, there was a higher rate of GV eradication (92% vs 47%, P = .01) and a trend toward a lower rate of GV rebleeding (0% vs 23%, P = .056). The estimated rebleeding rates were 0% versus 5% at 3 months, 0% versus 11% at 6 months, 0% versus 18% at 1 year, and 0% versus 38% at 2 years after combined therapy and TIPS, respectively (P = .077). There was no difference in ascites (13% vs 11%, P = .63), hepatic encephalopathy (47% vs 55%, P = .44), or esophageal variceal bleeding (0% vs 0%, P > .999) after the procedure between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The GV eradication rate is significantly higher after combined therapy, with no associated increase in portal hypertensive complications. This translates to a clinically meaningful trend toward a reduction in GV rebleeding. The value of a combined treatment strategy should be prospectively studied in a larger cohort to determine the optimal management of GVs.

摘要

目的

比较联合经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)加曲张静脉闭塞术与单纯 TIPS 治疗胃静脉曲张(GVs)的安全性和临床结局。

材料和方法

对 2008 年至 2019 年间因出血或高危 GVs 接受治疗的 40 例患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。这些患者接受了联合治疗(n=18)或单纯 TIPS 治疗(n=22)。两组在年龄、性别、终末期肝病模型评分或 GV 类型方面无显著差异。主要结局是 GV 消除率和再出血率。次要结局包括门脉高压并发症和肝性脑病。

结果

联合治疗组的平均随访时间为 15.4 个月,TIPS 组为 22.9 个月(P=0.32)。联合治疗后,GV 消除率更高(92%比 47%,P=0.01),GV 再出血率有降低趋势(0%比 23%,P=0.056)。联合治疗和 TIPS 治疗后 3 个月的估计再出血率分别为 0%比 5%,6 个月分别为 0%比 11%,1 年分别为 0%比 18%,2 年分别为 0%比 38%(P=0.077)。术后两组腹水(13%比 11%,P=0.63)、肝性脑病(47%比 55%,P=0.44)或食管静脉曲张出血(0%比 0%,P>0.999)发生率无差异。

结论

联合治疗后 GV 消除率显著提高,而门脉高压并发症无增加。这意味着 GV 再出血率有显著降低的临床意义趋势。联合治疗策略的价值应在更大的队列中进行前瞻性研究,以确定 GVs 的最佳治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Combined Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Plus Variceal Obliteration versus Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Alone for the Management of Gastric Varices: Comparative Single-Center Clinical Outcomes.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术联合胃静脉曲张结扎术与单纯经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗胃静脉曲张的对比:单中心临床结局比较。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Feb;32(2):282-291.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.10.009.
2
Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation and Variceal Coil or Plug Embolization Ineffectively Attain Gastric Variceal Decompression or Occlusion: Results of a 26-Patient Retrospective Study.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术联合曲张静脉弹簧圈或栓塞剂栓塞术对胃静脉曲张减压或闭塞效果不佳:一项26例患者的回顾性研究结果
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Jul;27(7):1001-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.02.019. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
3
Comparison of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) alone and combined with embolisation for the management of cardiofundal varices: a retrospective study.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)单独与联合栓塞治疗心基底部静脉曲张的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Feb;29(2):699-706. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5645-2. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
4
Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration versus Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for the Management of Gastric Variceal Bleeding.球囊闭塞逆行经静脉断流术与经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗胃静脉曲张出血。
Gut Liver. 2018 Nov 15;12(6):704-713. doi: 10.5009/gnl17515.
5
Outcome of 100 patients after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for variceal hemorrhage.100例患者经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗静脉曲张出血后的结局
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Sep;92(9):1444-52.
6
Short-term rebleeding rates for isolated gastric varices managed by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术与球囊闭塞逆行静脉栓塞术治疗孤立性胃静脉曲张的短期再出血率比较
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Mar;25(3):355-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.12.001. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
7
Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation for Treatment of Gastric Varices: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗胃静脉曲张:临床结局的系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Aug;44(8):1231-1239. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-02836-y. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
8
6-mm shunt transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with severe liver atrophy and variceal bleeding.6毫米分流的经颈静脉肝内门体分流术用于治疗严重肝萎缩和静脉曲张出血患者。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jul;34(7):4697-4707. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10346-3. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
9
Randomised trial of transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic shunt versus endoscopy plus propranolol for prevention of variceal rebleeding.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术与内镜检查加普萘洛尔预防静脉曲张再出血的随机试验
Lancet. 1997 Apr 12;349(9058):1043-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)08189-5.
10
Efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with adjunctive embolotherapy with cyanoacrylate for esophageal variceal bleeding.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术联合氰基丙烯酸酯栓塞治疗食管静脉曲张出血的疗效。
Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Sep;59(9):2325-32. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3150-2. Epub 2014 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: An Update.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术:最新进展
Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama). 2023 Feb 9;9(3):142-148. doi: 10.22575/interventionalradiology.2022-0011. eCollection 2024 Nov 1.
2
Evaluation and clinical significance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound on changes in liver blood flow perfusion after TIPS surgery.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后肝血流灌注变化的超声造影评估及其临床意义。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Apr 26;103(17):e37899. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037899.
3
Efficacy of TIPS plus extrahepatic collateral embolisation in real-world data: a validation study.
经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)联合体外线栓术治疗的真实世界数据疗效:验证性研究。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Feb 23;11(1):e001310. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001310.
4
Pre-emptive TIPS for the treatment of bleeding from gastric fundal varices: Results of a randomised controlled trial.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)预防胃底静脉曲张出血的随机对照试验结果
JHEP Rep. 2023 Mar 1;5(6):100717. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100717. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Comparative outcome of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with or without variceal obliteration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术联合或不联合静脉曲张闭塞术的比较结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Apr;48(4):1429-1437. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03843-y. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
6
Friend or Foe? Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunts in Cirrhosis-Current Understanding and Future Prospects.敌友难分:肝硬化自发性门体分流——当前认识与未来展望。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug 12;2021:8795115. doi: 10.1155/2021/8795115. eCollection 2021.