Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, UW Medicine Sleep Center at Harborview Medical Center, Box 359803, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, TRW Building, Room 3E23, 3280 Hospital Drive Northwest, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Sleep Med Clin. 2021 Mar;16(1):61-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
The high burden of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), combined with inadequate supply of sleep specialists and constraints on polysomnography resources, has prompted interest in alternative models of care to improve access and treatment effectiveness. In appropriately selected patients, ambulatory clinical pathways and use of nonphysicians or primary care providers to manage OSA can improve timely access and costs without compromising adherence or other clinical outcomes. Although initial studies show promising results, there are several potential barriers that must be considered before broad implementation, and further implementation research and economic evaluation studies are required.
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)负担沉重,加上睡眠专家供应不足和多导睡眠图资源受限,促使人们关注替代护理模式,以提高可及性和治疗效果。在选择合适的患者中,采用门诊临床路径和非医师或初级保健提供者来管理 OSA 可以在不影响依从性或其他临床结果的情况下,改善及时获得治疗的机会并降低成本。尽管初步研究显示出有希望的结果,但在广泛实施之前,必须考虑几个潜在的障碍,并且需要进一步开展实施研究和经济评估研究。