Hwang Brian Y, Negoita Serban, Duy Phan Q, Tesay Yohannes, Anderson William S
Division of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Division of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Feb;84:50-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.12.004. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been considered as an alternative therapy to reduce opioid requirements in certain chronic pain disorders. However, information on long-term opioid consumption patterns and their impact on SCS device explantation is lacking. We conducted a retrospective study of 45 patients to characterize long-term patterns of opioid usage after SCS implantation. Daily morphine equivalent dosage (MED) increased, decreased, and remained the same in 40%, 40%, and 20% of patients at 1-year follow-up, respectively. Twelve (27%) underwent explantation due to treatment failure at a median of 18 months after implantation. Pre-operative opioid status (naïve vs. active use) was not associated with explantation (18% vs. 29%, p = 0.699) and neither was the daily MED change status (i.e. increased, decreased, unchanged) at 1-year (p = 0.499, 1.000, 0.735, respectively). Following explantation, reduction in the daily MED was seen in 92% of patients with dosages falling below pre-operative baseline in nine. Among the opioid naïve patients, 55% were on opioids at last follow-up (average 32.4 ± 14.6 months). Our results indicate that daily opioid consumption does not decrease in most patients 1-year after SCS implantation. Furthermore, post-operative evaluation beyond 1-year is necessary to assess the efficacy and durability of SCS therapy as well as its impact on opioid requirement. Lastly, rigorous patient selection and pre-operative risk assessment for misuse and dependence are paramount to improving outcome after SCS implantation.
脊髓刺激(SCS)已被视为一种替代疗法,用于减少某些慢性疼痛疾病中的阿片类药物需求。然而,关于长期阿片类药物消费模式及其对SCS设备取出的影响的信息尚缺。我们对45例患者进行了一项回顾性研究,以描述SCS植入后阿片类药物使用的长期模式。在1年随访时,分别有40%、40%和20%的患者每日吗啡当量剂量(MED)增加、减少和保持不变。12例(27%)患者因治疗失败在植入后中位18个月时接受了设备取出。术前阿片类药物状态(未使用过与正在使用)与设备取出无关(分别为18%对29%,p = 0.699),1年时每日MED变化状态(即增加、减少、不变)也与设备取出无关(p分别为0.499、1.000、0.735)。设备取出后,92%的患者每日MED减少,其中9例患者的剂量降至术前基线以下。在未使用过阿片类药物的患者中,55%在最后随访时使用了阿片类药物(平均32.4±14.6个月)。我们的结果表明,在SCS植入后1年,大多数患者的每日阿片类药物消费量并未减少。此外,有必要进行1年以上的术后评估,以评估SCS治疗的疗效和耐久性及其对阿片类药物需求的影响。最后,严格的患者选择和术前对滥用及依赖的风险评估对于改善SCS植入后的结果至关重要。