Research Unit of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Center for Life Course Health Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021 Jul;6(7):692-705. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
Although the link between early adversity (EA) and later-life psychiatric disorders is well established, it has yet to be elucidated whether EA is related to distortions in the processing of different facial expressions. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate whether exposure to EA relates to distortions in responses to different facial emotions at three levels: 1) event-related potentials of the P100 and N170, 2) amygdala functional magnetic resonance imaging responses, and 3) accuracy rate or reaction time in behavioral data.
The systematic literature search (PubMed and Web of Science) up to April 2020 resulted in 29 behavioral studies (n = 8555), 32 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies (n = 2771), and 3 electroencephalography studies (n = 197) for random-effect meta-analyses.
EA was related to heightened bilateral amygdala reactivity to sad faces (but not other facial emotions). Exposure to EA was related to faster reaction time but a normal accuracy rate in response to angry and sad faces. In response to fearful and happy faces, EA was related to a lower accuracy rate only in individuals with recent EA exposure. This effect was more pronounced in individuals with exposure to EA before (vs. after) the age of 3 years. These findings were independent of psychiatric diagnoses. Because of the low number of eligible electroencephalography studies, no conclusions could be reached regarding the effect of EA on the event-related potentials.
EA relates to alterations in behavioral and neurophysiological processing of facial emotions. Our study stresses the importance of assessing age at exposure and time since EA because these factors mediate some EA-related perturbations.
尽管早期逆境(EA)与晚年精神障碍之间的联系已得到充分证实,但尚不清楚 EA 是否与不同面部表情的处理扭曲有关。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以调查 EA 是否与以下三个层面的不同面部情绪反应的扭曲有关:1)P100 和 N170 的事件相关电位;2)杏仁核的功能磁共振成像反应;3)行为数据中的准确率或反应时间。
系统文献检索(PubMed 和 Web of Science)截至 2020 年 4 月,共纳入 29 项行为研究(n=8555)、32 项功能磁共振成像研究(n=2771)和 3 项脑电图研究(n=197)进行随机效应荟萃分析。
EA 与双侧杏仁核对悲伤面孔的反应性增强有关(但对其他面部表情无影响)。暴露于 EA 与对愤怒和悲伤面孔的反应更快的反应时间有关,但准确率正常。对于恐惧和快乐的面孔,只有在最近经历过 EA 暴露的个体中,EA 与较低的准确率有关。这种影响在 3 岁之前(而非之后)经历过 EA 的个体中更为明显。这些发现与精神诊断无关。由于合格的脑电图研究数量较少,因此无法确定 EA 对事件相关电位的影响。
EA 与面部情绪的行为和神经生理处理改变有关。我们的研究强调了评估暴露年龄和 EA 发生时间的重要性,因为这些因素会影响一些与 EA 相关的干扰。