Raz Sivan, Dan Orrie
Department of Psychology, The Center for Psychobiological Research, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, 19300, Israel; Department of Psychology, Tel Hai College, 12208, Israel.
Department of Psychology, The Center for Psychobiological Research, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, 19300, Israel.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Mar;126(3):514-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.06.023. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
This study investigated behavioral and neural correlates of emotional processing in adults with ADHD using scalp-recorded event-related potentials (ERPs).
We used a visual-emotional oddball paradigm, in which subjects were confronted with neutral and emotional faces (happy and angry). Responses to target and non-target stimuli were compared across groups of 17 adults with ADHD and 20 control subjects.
Participants with ADHD had slower RTs than controls in response to happy but not to angry faces. ADHD participants, but not controls, responded faster to angry than to happy faces. ERP results indicated that group significantly interacted with the type of facial expression. P1 was significantly increased for the ADHD group compared with controls, but only to emotional (and not to neutral) faces. In the ADHD group, but not in controls, P1 was greater in response to emotional compared with neutral faces. N170 was more pronounced to angry than to happy faces in the ADHD group, while in the control group N170 was more pronounced to happy than to angry faces. Participants with ADHD showed a pronounced reduction in P3 to both emotional and neutral faces.
The current results provide indication of altered behavioral responses as well as altered P1, N170 and P3 to emotional faces in adults with ADHD compared with healthy controls.
Behavioral and brain function measures of emotion processing may provide valuable additional tools for clinical assessment of ADHD in adulthood.
本研究使用头皮记录的事件相关电位(ERP)来探究注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)成人患者情绪加工的行为和神经相关性。
我们采用了视觉情绪oddball范式,让受试者面对中性和情绪性面孔(开心和愤怒)。比较了17名ADHD成人患者组和20名对照受试者对目标和非目标刺激的反应。
ADHD患者对开心面孔的反应时比对照组慢,但对愤怒面孔的反应时则不然。ADHD参与者对愤怒面孔的反应比对开心面孔的反应更快,而对照组则没有这种情况。ERP结果表明,组别与面部表情类型存在显著交互作用。与对照组相比,ADHD组的P1显著增加,但仅针对情绪性(而非中性)面孔。在ADHD组中,与中性面孔相比,对情绪性面孔的P1更大,而对照组则没有这种情况。在ADHD组中,N170对愤怒面孔的反应比对开心面孔更明显,而在对照组中,N170对开心面孔的反应比对愤怒面孔更明显。ADHD患者对情绪性和中性面孔的P3均显著降低。
目前的结果表明,与健康对照组相比,ADHD成人患者对情绪性面孔的行为反应以及P1、N170和P3均发生了改变。
情绪加工的行为和脑功能测量可能为ADHD成人期的临床评估提供有价值的额外工具。