A call for HoLEP: en-bloc vs. two-lobe vs. three-lobe.

PURPOSE

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) is widely accepted as standard laser enucleation technique for patients with benign prostate obstruction (BPO). Initially developed as a three-lobe enucleation technique, several modifications have been published. Comparison of the enucleation techniques is lacking. Therefor we aimed to compare outcomes of three enucleation techniques (en-bloc vs. two-lobe vs. three-lobe).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We prospectively collected data of 600 patients treated between 01/2017 and 12/2017 with HoLEP for BPO. Patients were randomised to either enbloc, two-lobe, or three-lobe enucleation, respectively. Data collection consisted of parameters on operation time, perioperative parameters, and functional outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses (ANOVA-test for continuous variables; Chi2-test for categorical variables) were performed regarding differences between the three enucleation techniques.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were not significantly different (all p > 0.05). Significant differences were observed with respect to overall operation time (en-bloc vs. two-lobe vs. three-lobe: 40.5 vs. 40.7 vs. 47.9, respectively; p < 0.001), speed (g/min.) (en-bloc vs. two-lobe vs. three-lobe, 1.82 vs. 1.76 vs. 1.67, respectively; p 0.006), and enucleation time (en-bloc vs. two-lobe vs. three-lobe: 31.7 vs. 32 vs. 37.7, respectively; p < 0.001). When solely comparing en-bloc vs. two-lobe enucleation, differences in terms of enucleation time, operation time, and speed were not significantly different (p 0.8, 0.9, and 0.2, respectively). Postoperative outcomes were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

All three HoLEP enucleation techniques show similar postoperative outcomes. However, enbloc and two-lobe enucleation are significantly faster with respect to enucleation, overall operation time, and speed compared to the three-lobe technique.