Suppr超能文献

钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)整块切除技术的长期学习曲线:单外科医生 500 例连续病例系列。

The long-term learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in the en-bloc technique: a single surgeon series of 500 consecutive cases.

机构信息

Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.

Department of Urology, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2024 Jul 24;42(1):436. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05097-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate perioperative parameters, clinical outcomes, and the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) of a single surgeon in 500 consecutive cases.

METHODS

Demographic parameters, outcomes, and adverse events were evaluated. The learning curve for HoLEP in en-bloc technique of the first 500 consecutive patients was analyzed in clusters of 100 (clusters 1-5) using the Wilcoxen rank test, Chi² test and Kruskal Wallis test.

RESULTS

Enucleation weight was similar in the clusters 1,2,3, and 5 (62 g, 63 g, 61 g, 61 g), in cluster 4 it was slightly higher at 73 g. There was a significant reduction in operating time from 67 min (cluster 1) to 57 min (cluster 2), 46 min (cluster 3), 53 min (cluster 4), and 43 min (cluster 5), p < 0.001. Enucleation efficiency (g/min) showed a steady increase (1.72, 2.24, 2.79, 2.92 vs. 2.99, p < 0.001). Laser energy efficiency also improved (2.17 vs. 2.12 vs. 1.71 vs. 1.65 vs. 1.55; p < 0.001). There was no measurable learning curve regarding the length of hospital stay (mean 2.5 days), catheterization time (1.9 days), hemoglobin drop (approx. 1 g/dl) or complications (p > 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

HoLEP using the en-bloc technique is a safe and highly effective method. Over time, a slight but steady learning curve and improvement in operation time, enucleation efficiency and laser energy efficiency were shown even for an experienced surgeon - after 500 cases, still no plateau was reached. There was no measurable learning curve regarding blood loss, complications, length of hospital stay, and catheterization time.

摘要

目的

评估一位外科医生在 500 例连续病例中经钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)的围手术期参数、临床结果和学习曲线。

方法

评估人口统计学参数、结果和不良事件。使用 Wilcoxen 秩检验、卡方检验和 Kruskal Wallis 检验对前 500 例连续患者的整块技术 HoLEP 学习曲线进行聚类分析,每 100 例为一组(聚类 1-5)。

结果

在第 1、2、3 和 5 个聚类中,剜除重量相似(62 克、63 克、61 克、61 克),在第 4 个聚类中略高,为 73 克。手术时间从第 1 个聚类的 67 分钟显著减少至第 2 个聚类的 57 分钟、第 3 个聚类的 46 分钟、第 4 个聚类的 53 分钟和第 5 个聚类的 43 分钟,p<0.001。剜除效率(g/min)呈稳步增加(1.72、2.24、2.79、2.92 与 2.99,p<0.001)。激光能量效率也得到改善(2.17 与 2.12、2.17 与 1.71、2.17 与 1.65、2.17 与 1.55,p<0.001)。住院时间(平均 2.5 天)、导管插入时间(1.9 天)、血红蛋白下降(约 1g/dl)或并发症(p>0.1)无明显学习曲线。

结论

整块技术 HoLEP 是一种安全且高效的方法。随着时间的推移,即使是经验丰富的外科医生,手术时间、剜除效率和激光能量效率也会出现轻微但稳定的学习曲线提高,在 500 例后仍未达到平台期。出血量、并发症、住院时间和导管插入时间无明显学习曲线。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a63/11269500/577f3a445827/345_2024_5097_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验