Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health (SCIBIS), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Performance Department, Atalanta B.C., Ciserano, Italy.
Res Sports Med. 2022 Mar-Apr;30(2):182-192. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2021.1878460. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
To compare three different protocols to assess the velocity associated with the maximal oxygen uptake (V) in soccer players. Sixteen semi-professional soccer players performed three maximum incremental tests on treadmill: two continuous protocols [1 km·h·min (CP1); and 1 km·h every 2 min (CP2)], and one discontinuous (DP) protocol to determine V, maximum oxygen uptake (VO) and oxygen cost of running (i.e., the slope of the VO vs velocity relationship at submaximal exercise). V was higher in CP1> CP2> DP (19.4 ± 1.7, 17.4 ± 1.2, 16.1 ± 1.1 km·h for CP1, CP2, and DP, respectively; < 0.05 ES: 0.09 to 3.36). No difference in VO was found between CP1, CP2 and DP (> 0.05). Oxygen cost of running showed between-protocol differences (CP1> CP2> DP; < 0.05; ES: 0.28 to 3.30). V was higher when determined using continuous vs discontinuous protocols due to the greater overestimation in oxygen cost of running. Such differences in V should be considered to optimize acute physiological responses during high-intensity running activities.
比较三种不同的方案来评估足球运动员与最大摄氧量(V)相关的速度。16 名半职业足球运动员在跑步机上进行了三次最大增量测试:两种连续方案[1 km·h·min(CP1);和每 2 分钟 1 km·h(CP2)]和一种不连续(DP)方案来确定 V、最大摄氧量(VO)和跑步的耗氧量(即,亚最大运动时 VO 与速度关系的斜率)。V 在 CP1>CP2>DP 中更高(分别为 19.4±1.7、17.4±1.2、16.1±1.1 km·h;CP1、CP2 和 DP 之间的差异<0.05,ES:0.09 至 3.36)。CP1、CP2 和 DP 之间的 VO 无差异(>0.05)。跑步的耗氧量显示出方案间的差异(CP1>CP2>DP;<0.05;ES:0.28 至 3.30)。由于跑步的耗氧量的过度估计,连续与不连续方案相比,V 更高。在进行高强度跑步活动时,应考虑 V 的这些差异以优化急性生理反应。