Department of Nutrition and Health, Federal University of Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Nutrition Science Course, Federal University of Tocantins (UFT), Palmas, TO, Brazil.
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Feb;41:94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
To evaluate the scientific evidences on the prevalence, diagnostic criteria, and factors related to sarcopenic obesity (SO) in Brazilian older adults.
this systematic review was based on searches of the databases PubMed, Science Direct, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), Web of Science, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and Scopus. The systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). The inclusion criteria were: original articles of observational design that evaluated the presence of sarcopenic obesity in Brazilian older adults (≥60 years). Therefore, studies that investigated only obesity or sarcopenia, animal studies, review studies, congress publications, theses, dissertations, book chapters, editorials, letters to the editor, and newspaper articles were not included.
The initial screening identified 549 records. After removing the duplicates, assessing the titles and abstracts, and the complete analysis of the papers, 12 studies were included in the review. The sample size of the studies ranged from 56 to 1373 subjects, most of them selected by convenience sampling (n = 11) and exclusively with women (n = 9). The prevalence of SO varied from 4.4% to 48.4%. No consensus was found on the diagnostic criteria for SO. The main associations identified were between SO and decrease in muscle strength, aerobic fitness, gait speed, and increase in frequency of frailty and cardiometabolic and inflammatory alterations.
Epidemiological studies conducted so far in Brazil are heterogeneous, which limits the possibility of comparison between prevalence and distribution of sarcopenic obesity among older adults. Further studies with representative samples of the population are required to understand the magnitude of SO in this group.
评估巴西老年人中肌少症性肥胖(SO)的流行率、诊断标准和相关因素的科学证据。
本系统评价基于对 PubMed、Science Direct、Excerpta Medica Database (Embase)、Web of Science、Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) 和 Scopus 数据库的检索。系统评价按照 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis(PRISMA)进行。纳入标准为:评估巴西老年人(≥60 岁)中存在肌少症性肥胖的观察性设计的原始文章。因此,仅研究肥胖或肌少症、动物研究、综述研究、会议出版物、论文、学位论文、图书章节、社论、给编辑的信和报纸文章的研究不包括在内。
最初的筛选确定了 549 条记录。在去除重复项、评估标题和摘要以及完整分析论文后,有 12 项研究纳入了综述。研究的样本量范围从 56 到 1373 名受试者,其中大多数是通过方便抽样(n=11)选择的,并且全部是女性(n=9)。SO 的患病率从 4.4%到 48.4%不等。尚未就 SO 的诊断标准达成共识。确定的主要关联是 SO 与肌肉力量、有氧健身、步态速度下降以及虚弱、心脏代谢和炎症改变的频率增加之间的关联。
迄今为止在巴西进行的流行病学研究具有异质性,这限制了老年人中肌少症性肥胖的患病率和分布之间进行比较的可能性。需要对具有代表性的人群样本进行进一步的研究,以了解该人群中 SO 的严重程度。