Veronese Nicola, Ragusa Francesco Saverio, Pegreffi Francesco, Dominguez Ligia J, Barbagallo Mario, Zanetti Michela, Cereda Emanuele
Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Dipartimento di Scienze per la Qualità della Vita-QUVI, Università di Bologna, Rimini, Italy.
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024 Aug;15(4):1264-1274. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13502. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
Many studies support the idea that sarcopenic obesity (SO) could be considered a potential risk factor for negative health outcomes. These results have been inconsistent, and no umbrella reviews exist regarding this topic. Several databases until November 2023 were searched for systematic reviews with meta-analysis of observational studies (cross-sectional, case-control and prospective). For each association, random-effects summary effect sizes with correspondent 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were evaluated using the GRADE tool. Among the 213 papers initially screened, nine systematic reviews with meta-analysis were included, for a total of 384 710 participants. In cross-sectional and case-control studies, 30 different outcomes were analysed, and 18 were statistically significant. In any population addressed in cross-sectional and case-control studies, compared with non-SO, SO increased the prevalence of cognitive impairment (k = 3; odds ratio [OR] = 3.46; 95% CI: 2.24-5.32; high certainty of evidence), coronary artery disease (k = 2; OR = 2.48; 95% CI: 1.85-3.31) and dyslipidaemia (k = 3; OR = 2.50; 95% CI: 1.51-4.15). When compared with sarcopenia or obesity, the results were conflicting. In prospective studies, the association between SO-compared with non-SO-and other negative outcomes was supported by low/very low certainty of evidence and limited to a few conditions. Besides, no comparison with sarcopenia or obesity was provided. Finally, only a few studies have considered muscle function/physical performance in the diagnostic workup. SO could be considered a risk factor only for a few conditions, with the literature mainly based on cross-sectional and case-control studies. Future studies with clear definitions of SO are needed for quantifying the importance of SO-particularly when compared with the presence of only sarcopenia or obesity-and the weight of muscle function/physical performance in its definition.
许多研究支持这样一种观点,即肌少症肥胖(SO)可被视为负面健康结果的潜在风险因素。这些结果并不一致,且关于该主题尚无综合评价。检索了截至2023年11月的几个数据库,以查找对观察性研究(横断面研究、病例对照研究和前瞻性研究)进行荟萃分析的系统评价。对于每种关联,使用GRADE工具评估随机效应汇总效应大小及相应的95%置信区间(CI)。在最初筛选的213篇论文中,纳入了9篇进行荟萃分析的系统评价,共有384710名参与者。在横断面研究和病例对照研究中,分析了30种不同的结果,其中18种具有统计学意义。在横断面研究和病例对照研究涉及的任何人群中,与非SO相比,SO增加了认知障碍(k = 3;比值比[OR] = 3.46;95%CI:2.24 - 5.32;证据确定性高)、冠状动脉疾病(k = 2;OR = 2.48;95%CI:1.85 - 3.31)和血脂异常(k = 3;OR = 2.50;95%CI:1.51 - 4.15)的患病率。与肌少症或肥胖症相比时,结果相互矛盾。在前瞻性研究中,SO与非SO相比和其他负面结果之间的关联证据确定性低/非常低,且仅限于少数情况。此外,未提供与肌少症或肥胖症的比较。最后,只有少数研究在诊断检查中考虑了肌肉功能/身体表现。SO仅在少数情况下可被视为风险因素,现有文献主要基于横断面研究和病例对照研究。需要开展对SO有明确定义的未来研究,以量化SO的重要性——特别是与仅存在肌少症或肥胖症相比时——以及肌肉功能/身体表现在其定义中的权重。