Suppr超能文献

利用人工智能模型评估自动拍摄的头颅 X 光片图像整合。

Evaluation of automated photograph-cephalogram image integration using artificial intelligence models.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2024 Nov 1;94(6):595-601. doi: 10.2319/010124-1.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop and evaluate an automated method for combining a digital photograph with a lateral cephalogram.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 985 digital photographs were collected and soft tissue landmarks were manually detected. Then 2500 lateral cephalograms were collected, and corresponding soft tissue landmarks were manually detected. Using the images and landmark identification information, two different artificial intelligence (AI) models-one for detecting soft tissue on photographs and the other for identifying soft tissue on cephalograms-were developed using different deep-learning algorithms. The digital photographs were rotated, scaled, and shifted to minimize the squared sum of distances between the soft tissue landmarks identified by the two different AI models. As a validation process, eight soft tissue landmarks were selected on digital photographs and lateral cephalometric radiographs from 100 additionally collected validation subjects. Paired t-tests were used to compare the accuracy of measures obtained between the automated and manual image integration methods.

RESULTS

The validation results showed statistically significant differences between the automated and manual methods on the upper lip and soft tissue B point. Otherwise, no statistically significant difference was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Automated photograph-cephalogram image integration using AI models seemed to be as reliable as manual superimposition procedures.

摘要

目的

开发并评估一种将数码照片与侧位头颅片相结合的自动化方法。

材料与方法

共采集了 985 张数码照片,并手动检测软组织标志点。然后采集了 2500 张侧位头颅片,并手动检测相应的软组织标志点。利用这些图像和标志点识别信息,使用不同的深度学习算法,开发了两种不同的人工智能(AI)模型,一种用于检测照片中的软组织,另一种用于识别头颅片中的软组织。对数码照片进行旋转、缩放和移动,以最小化两个不同 AI 模型识别的软组织标志点之间的平方距离和。作为验证过程,从另外收集的 100 名验证对象的数码照片和侧位头颅片上选择了 8 个软组织标志点。采用配对 t 检验比较自动和手动图像融合方法获得的测量值的准确性。

结果

验证结果显示,在上唇和软组织 B 点,自动方法与手动方法之间存在统计学显著差异。否则,未发现统计学显著差异。

结论

使用 AI 模型的自动照片-头颅片图像融合似乎与手动叠加程序一样可靠。

相似文献

4
Preciseness of artificial intelligence for lateral cephalometric measurements.人工智能在侧颅测量中的精确性。
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 May;85(Suppl 1):27-33. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00459-1. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
5
A new craniofacial diagnostic technique: the Sydney diagnostic system.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):334-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.047.
8
Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks:自动识别头影测量标志点:
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jan;90(1):69-76. doi: 10.2319/022019-129.1. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

3
Factors influencing the development of artificial intelligence in orthodontics.影响正畸学中人工智能发展的因素。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Dec;27 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):6-12. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12806. Epub 2024 May 7.
9
Esthetic evaluation of profile photographs showing various sagittal and vertical patterns.展示各种矢状和垂直模式的侧貌照片的美学评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Mar;159(3):281-291. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.027. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验