Michiels G, Sather A H
Section of Orthodontics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1994;9(1):43-54.
Esthetic profile evaluation was performed by six judges on a random sample of 130 white women. Vertical and horizontal profile evaluations of the subjects' cephalograms were compared with vertical and horizontal profile evaluations of the same subjects' photographic slides. Statistically significant differences were found: Judges sometimes favored the photographic profile and sometimes favored the cephalographic profile. Esthetic treatment goals should be based on facial shortcomings as they are observed clinically or seen on a patient's photograph.
六名评委对130名白人女性的随机样本进行了美学轮廓评估。将受试者头颅侧位片的垂直和水平轮廓评估与同一受试者的摄影幻灯片的垂直和水平轮廓评估进行比较。发现了具有统计学意义的差异:评委有时青睐摄影轮廓,有时青睐头颅侧位片轮廓。美学治疗目标应基于临床观察到的或患者照片上显示的面部缺陷。