• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Conflict between Pharmacy Preceptors and Pharmacy Learners in Experiential Education.药学实践教育中带教教师与药学专业学生之间的冲突
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Winter;74(1):36-42. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
2
How Preceptors Support Pharmacy Learner Professional Identity Formation.如何指导教师支持药学学习者职业认同感的形成。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2024 Sep;88(9):100740. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.100740. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
3
An Analysis of Canadian Doctor of Pharmacy Student Experiences in Non-Traditional Student-Preceptor Models.非传统师生模式下的加拿大药学博士学生体验分析。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Dec;83(10):7367. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7367.
4
Preceptor tips for navigating generational differences with introductory and advanced pharmacy practice experience students.带教老师指导:如何与参与基础和进阶药学实践经验的学生应对代际差异
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Oct-Dec;18(4):2176. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.4.2176. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
5
A nationwide survey of the perception of the APPE by community pharmacy preceptors in South Korea.一项针对韩国社区药房导师对 APPE 认知的全国性调查。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Nov-Dec;61(6):715-721.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 May 24.
6
National survey of volunteer pharmacy preceptors.全国志愿药房带教老师调查。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Oct 15;72(5):112. doi: 10.5688/aj7205112.
7
National Survey of Volunteer Pharmacy Preceptors: effects of region, practice setting, and population density on responses.全国志愿药学带教老师调查:地区、执业环境和人口密度对调查结果的影响。
J Pharm Pract. 2010 Jun;23(3):265-72. doi: 10.1177/0897190010366927. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
8
Development of a supervisory skills course for hospital pharmacy workplaces.医院药房工作场所监督技能课程的开发。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2010 Jul;63(4):295-303. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v63i4.933.
9
Evaluation of generational influences among 4th year pharmacy students and experiential preceptors.对四年级药学专业学生和实习带教老师代际影响的评估。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Sep;11(9):888-894. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 May 24.
10
Impact of Communication Method and Timeliness on Student and Faculty Perception of Professionalism and Value.沟通方式和及时性对学生及教师职业素养认知和价值观的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Feb;86(2):ajpe8391. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8391. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Mitigating stereotypes and bias in professional identity formation for those with marginalized identities.减少具有边缘化身份者在职业身份形成过程中的刻板印象和偏见。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Mar 18;14:100434. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100434. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Navigating power dynamics between pharmacy preceptors and learners.应对药房带教老师与学员之间的权力动态关系。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Jan 17;13:100408. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100408. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Pharmacy Student Perceptions of the Roles and Attributes of Pharmacist Preceptors in Australia.澳大利亚药学专业学生对药师带教老师角色和特质的认知
Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Dec 4;10(6):169. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10060169.

本文引用的文献

1
Definition of professionalism and tools for assessing professionalism in pharmacy practice: a systemic review.药学实践中专业素养的定义及评估专业素养的工具:一项系统综述
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:22. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.22. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
2
Longitudinal evaluation of student professionalism throughout the professional didactic curriculum of a pharmacy program.在药学专业的专业教学课程中对学生职业素养进行纵向评估。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Mar;10(3):325-332. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
3
Nursing and pharmacy students' use of emotionally intelligent behaviours to manage challenging interpersonal situations with staff during clinical placement: A qualitative study.护理和药学专业学生在临床实习中运用情绪智力行为管理与员工的挑战性人际情境:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jul;27(13-14):2699-2709. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13865. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
4
Constructive ways to prevent, identify, and remediate deficiencies of "challenging trainees" in experiential education.预防、识别和纠正体验式教育中“具有挑战性的学员”的不足的建设性方法。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Jul 1;73(13):996-1009. doi: 10.2146/ajhp150330.
5
Development of a precepting workshop for pharmacy residents.为药学住院医师开发一个带教工作坊。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Feb 1;73(3):127-32. doi: 10.2146/ajhp150119.
6
Results of a survey to assess residency preceptor development methods and precepting challenges.一项评估住院医师带教方法及带教挑战的调查结果。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Aug 1;72(15):1305-14. doi: 10.2146/ajhp140659.
7
Conflict resolution strategies between preceptor and resident--a case-based scenario.带教老师与住院医师之间的冲突解决策略——基于案例的情景分析
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014 Feb 1;71(3):184-6. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120679.
8
Intergenerational conflict in nursing preceptorship.护理带教中的代际冲突。
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Sep;33(9):1003-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.019. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
9
Conflict in the preceptorship or field experience: a rippling tide of silence.临床带教或实习经历中的冲突:沉默的涟漪浪潮。
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2006;3:Article 6. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1202. Epub 2006 Jan 24.
10
Preceptorship and interpersonal conflict: a multidisciplinary study.导师指导与人际冲突:一项多学科研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2003 Jul;43(2):188-96. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02693.x.

药学实践教育中带教教师与药学专业学生之间的冲突

Conflict between Pharmacy Preceptors and Pharmacy Learners in Experiential Education.

作者信息

Kendrick Jennifer, Beauchesne Arielle, Lee Yunji Valerie, Corrigan Sue, Carr Roxane

机构信息

, BScPharm, ACPR, PharmD, is with the Pharmacy Department, Children's and Women's Health Centre of BC, and the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.

, PharmD, ACPR, was, at the time of this study, a student in the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia. She is now a Year 2 Resident with Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services.

出版信息

Can J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Winter;74(1):36-42. Epub 2021 Jan 1.

PMID:33487653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7801327/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The relationship between a preceptor and a learner is complex and can be prone to conflict. The issue of conflict in experiential education has been studied in medicine, nursing, social work, and education; however, conflict between pharmacy preceptors and learners has not been described.

OBJECTIVE

To describe types of conflict between pharmacy preceptors and learners, the outcomes of such conflict, the impacts on the preceptor-learner relationship, and conflict-resolution strategies.

METHODS

An anonymous electronic survey of pharmacist preceptors and pharmacy residents in British Columbia was conducted. The survey included various types of questions to enrich the quality of responses (e.g., Likert scale, ranking, and requests for comments). Descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS

Forty-nine participants completed the survey from the preceptor's perspective, 12 from the learner's perspective, and 4 from both perspectives. Sixty percent of preceptors (32/53) and 75% of learners (12/16) admitted experiencing conflict. Preceptors ( = 27) cited the learner's professionalism (74%), knowledge/skills (59%), communication issues (59%), personal issues (56%), and punctuality/attendance (52%) as causes of conflict. Learners, however ( = 12), cited differing expectations (67%), teaching versus learning style preferences (50%), and communication issues (67%) as causes of conflict. The majority of preceptors and learners indicated that conflict had negatively affected the relationship; however, most preceptors (69% [18/26]) and learners (50% [6/12]) agreed or strongly agreed with the statement, "I have generally felt comfortable working with preceptors/learners after a conflict." More learners than preceptors felt that the learner's ability to perform was negatively affected by the conflict (92% [11/12] versus 52% [13/25]). Preceptors were more likely to take initiative to resolve conflict. Verbal communication was the method of conflict resolution preferred by both preceptors and learners. Most preceptors and learners indicated that they felt that conflicts were generally resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

Conflict was common in the pharmacy preceptor-learner relationship. Pharmacy preceptors and learners had different perspectives about the causes and outcomes of conflict.

摘要

背景

带教老师与学员之间的关系复杂,容易产生冲突。医学、护理、社会工作和教育领域已对体验式教育中的冲突问题进行了研究;然而,药剂学带教老师与学员之间的冲突尚未见描述。

目的

描述药剂学带教老师与学员之间冲突的类型、此类冲突的结果、对带教老师-学员关系的影响以及冲突解决策略。

方法

对不列颠哥伦比亚省的药剂师带教老师和药学住院医师进行了匿名电子调查。该调查包括各类问题以提高回答质量(例如,李克特量表、排序以及评论请求)。采用描述性统计方法。

结果

从带教老师的角度有49名参与者完成了调查,从学员的角度有12名,4名参与者从两个角度都完成了调查。60%的带教老师(32/53)和75%的学员(12/16)承认经历过冲突。带教老师(n = 27)将学员的职业素养(74%)、知识/技能(59%)、沟通问题(59%)、个人问题(56%)以及守时/出勤(52%)列为冲突原因。然而,学员(n = 12)将期望差异(67%)、教学与学习风格偏好(50%)以及沟通问题(67%)列为冲突原因。大多数带教老师和学员表示冲突对关系产生了负面影响;然而,大多数带教老师(69% [18/26])和学员(50% [6/12])同意或强烈同意“冲突过后,我总体上觉得与带教老师/学员共事很自在”这一说法。认为冲突对学员执行能力产生负面影响的学员比带教老师更多(92% [11/12] 对52% [13/25])。带教老师更有可能主动解决冲突。言语沟通是带教老师和学员都偏爱的冲突解决方式。大多数带教老师和学员表示他们觉得冲突总体上得到了解决。

结论

冲突在药剂学带教老师-学员关系中很常见。药剂学带教老师和学员对冲突的原因和结果有不同的看法。