Suppr超能文献

评估全膝关节置换术后单股神经阻滞与股-坐骨神经联合阻滞的镇痛效果

Evaluating Analgesic Efficacy of Single Femoral Nerve Block versus Combined Femoral-Sciatic Nerve Block Post Total Knee Arthroplasty.

作者信息

Sinha Achirabha, Arora Divya, Singh Shailendra, Das Tanmoy, Biswas Mohua

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Department of Anesthesiology, BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Apr-Jun;14(2):326-330. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_78_20. Epub 2020 Oct 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With increasing knee replacement surgeries, there has been a constant search for effective pain control modality.

AIMS

We compared the analgesic effect of femoral nerve block (FNB) alone with combined femoral and sciatic nerve block (SNB) for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

SETTING AND DESIGN

This was a prospective observational study.

METHODS

A total of 150 adult patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I and II scheduled for elective TKA under spinal anesthesia with 3.4-mL bupivacaine 0.5% and 20-μg fentanyl were randomly allocated to two groups. Group F patients received a single shot FNB with 20 ml 0.375% ropivacaine and Group FS patients received combined FNB with 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine and SNB with 40 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine at the end of surgery. The primary outcome was the change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores between Groups F and FS at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 h later. The secondary outcome was total doses of opioid required in both groups.

RESULTS

The demographic data were comparable in both groups. The NRS scores were higher and statistically significant in Group F than that in Group FS at all five measured time points ( < 0.00001), and the total pain score with a mean of 15.43 in Group F and a mean of 9.61 in Group FS was statistically significant. Significantly more opioid consumption was seen postoperatively in Group F as compared to Group FS at 12, 18, 24, and 48 h as depicted by < 0.00001.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the FNB, when combined with SNB, shows superior results than femoral block alone. SNB reduced pain scores and opiate consumption postoperatively up to 48 h.

摘要

背景

随着膝关节置换手术数量的增加,人们一直在寻找有效的疼痛控制方法。

目的

我们比较了单纯股神经阻滞(FNB)与股神经联合坐骨神经阻滞(SNB)在全膝关节置换术(TKA)后疼痛管理中的镇痛效果。

设置与设计

这是一项前瞻性观察研究。

方法

总共150例美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为I级和II级、计划在脊髓麻醉下接受择期TKA的成年患者,使用3.4毫升0.5%布比卡因和20微克芬太尼,被随机分为两组。F组患者在手术结束时接受单次20毫升0.375%罗哌卡因的FNB,FS组患者接受20毫升0.375%罗哌卡因的FNB联合40毫升0.375%罗哌卡因的SNB。主要结局是F组和FS组在术后6、12、18、24和48小时数字评分量表(NRS)评分的变化。次要结局是两组所需阿片类药物的总剂量。

结果

两组的人口统计学数据具有可比性。在所有五个测量时间点,F组的NRS评分均高于FS组且具有统计学意义(<0.00001),F组的总疼痛评分平均为15.43,FS组平均为9.61,具有统计学意义。与FS组相比,F组在术后12、18、24和48小时的阿片类药物消耗量明显更多,差异有统计学意义(<0.00001)。

结论

我们得出结论,FNB与SNB联合使用时,显示出比单纯股神经阻滞更好的效果。SNB可降低术后48小时内的疼痛评分和阿片类药物消耗量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b01/7819409/2aa4a00bd713/AER-14-326-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验