• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Scanning the VIRUS: A study of dimensions of stress and coping with COVID-19.审视新冠疫情:一项关于压力维度及应对新冠疫情的研究
Curr Psychol. 2022;41(10):7326-7336. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01369-4. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
2
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the COVID Stress Scale.土耳其版 COVID 压力量表的有效性和可靠性。
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2021 Oct;51(5):525-536. doi: 10.4040/jkan.21106.
3
Development and Validation of a Coping Strategies Scale for Use in Chinese Contexts.适用于中国情境的应对策略量表的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 23;13:845769. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.845769. eCollection 2022.
4
Listen to the heart or mind first? Examining sequential coping mechanisms among Indians during the COVID-19 pandemic.先倾听内心还是理智?审视新冠疫情期间印度人的相继应对机制。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 1;14:1104973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104973. eCollection 2023.
5
Validity evidence for the coping strategy indicator-short version (CSI-S) among psychology students.心理学专业学生应对策略指标简短版(CSI-S)的有效性证据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 5;14(1):5441. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55659-5.
6
Coping strategies among children and adolescents: validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Kidcope scale.儿童和青少年的应对策略:儿童应对量表阿拉伯语版本的效度和信度
Heliyon. 2022 Jan 4;8(1):e08706. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08706. eCollection 2022 Jan.
7
Psychometric qualities of the English Coping Scales of the Stress and Coping Inventory in a representative UK sample.英国代表性样本中应激与应对量表的英文应对量表的心理计量学特性。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Feb 2;9(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00528-3.
8
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.
9
The pandemic coping scale - validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic.大流行应对量表——一种衡量大流行期间应对方式的简短量表的有效性和可靠性。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2022 Aug 18;10(1):762-785. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2022.2112198. eCollection 2022.
10
[Multidimensional assessment of coping: validation of the Brief COPE among French population].应对方式的多维评估:法国人群中简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)的效度验证
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-18.

引用本文的文献

1
Stress, internet use, substance use and coping among adolescents, young-adults and middle-age adults amid the 'new normal' pandemic era.“新常态”疫情时代青少年、青年和中年成年人的压力、互联网使用、物质使用及应对方式
Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021 Oct-Dec;12:100885. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100885. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
2
The (IOSPS-HW): Development and Psychometric Properties of a New Instrument to Assess Individual and Organizational Stress Factors in Periods of Pandemics.《IOSPS-HW》:在大流行期间评估个体和组织应激因素的新工具的开发和心理测量特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4082. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054082.
3
Indian Healthcare Workers' Issues, Challenges, and Coping Strategies during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.印度医护人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间的问题、挑战和应对策略:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 18;20(4):3661. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043661.
4
Uneven Implications of Lockdown Amid COVID-19 in India: From Harassment, Stigma, Crime, and Internally Displaced People to Stress and Coping Strategies in the Middle/Upper Class.印度新冠疫情封锁措施的不均衡影响:从骚扰、污名化、犯罪和国内流离失所者到中/上层阶级的压力与应对策略
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Sep 21;12(10):348. doi: 10.3390/bs12100348.
5
University Students Adjusting to COVID-19 Stressors: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the COVID-19 Stressors Questionnaire.适应新冠疫情压力源的大学生:新冠疫情压力源问卷的探索性与验证性因素分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 7;13:816961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.816961. eCollection 2022.
6
The Influence of COVID-19 Stress and Self-Concealment on Professional Help-Seeking Attitudes: A Cross-Sectional Study of University Students.新冠疫情压力与自我隐瞒对专业求助态度的影响:一项针对大学生的横断面研究
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Dec 16;14:2081-2091. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S345244. eCollection 2021.
7
Coping with COVID-19 stress: Associations with depression and anxiety in a diverse sample of U.S. adults.应对新冠疫情压力:美国成年人多样化样本中与抑郁和焦虑的关联
Curr Psychol. 2021 Nov 4:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02444-6.

审视新冠疫情:一项关于压力维度及应对新冠疫情的研究

Scanning the VIRUS: A study of dimensions of stress and coping with COVID-19.

作者信息

Ahuja Kanika K

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Lady Shri Ram College for Women, University of Delhi, Lajpat Nagar-IV, New Delhi, 110024 India.

出版信息

Curr Psychol. 2022;41(10):7326-7336. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01369-4. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1007/s12144-021-01369-4
PMID:33488039
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7813430/
Abstract

The current research examines the psychosocial stressors that Indians are facing as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, using a self-constructed COVID-19 Stress Scale (CSS). It also assesses the coping strategies being used currently. The sample comprised of 1009 Indians ranging between 17 and 83 years. The items of the CSS were constructed based on a review of existing scales, expert evaluations, and participant interviews. The factor structure of COVID-19 Stress Scale (CSS) was examined through the use of an exploratory factor analysis Several psychometric tests were conducted to ascertain its reliability and validity properties. Results suggest a five-factor structure: Vexation with Others, Immediate Concerns, Routine Disruption, Uncertainty about the Future, and Systemic stressors (abbreviated as VIRUS) explaining 55.269% of the total variance in COVID-19 stress. Coefficient alphas for the entire scale (0.90) and for each of the five factors, ranging from 0.69-0.85, indicate satisfactory internal consistency. One-way analysis of variance was done to assess the differences among emotion-focused, problem-solving, and seeking social support coping strategy. Correlations were calculated between various coping strategies and COVID-19 Stress. Results suggested that seeking social support was the most used coping strategy. No significant correlation was found between the use of any coping strategy and COVID-19 stress. The proposed VIRUS model adequately captures the stressful experience of COVID-19. COVID-19 Stress Scale (CSS), a 21-item scale has robust psychometric properties.

摘要

当前的研究使用自行构建的新冠疫情应激量表(CSS),考察了印度人因新冠疫情大流行而面临的心理社会压力源。研究还评估了当前正在使用的应对策略。样本包括1009名年龄在17至83岁之间的印度人。CSS的项目是在对现有量表进行综述、专家评估和参与者访谈的基础上构建的。通过探索性因素分析对新冠疫情应激量表(CSS)的因素结构进行了考察。进行了多项心理测量测试,以确定其信度和效度特性。结果显示了一个五因素结构:他人烦恼、即时担忧、日常干扰、未来不确定性和系统性压力源(简称为VIRUS),解释了新冠疫情应激总方差的55.269%。整个量表的系数阿尔法值(0.90)以及五个因素各自的系数阿尔法值,范围在0.69至0.85之间,表明内部一致性令人满意。进行了单因素方差分析,以评估情绪聚焦、解决问题和寻求社会支持应对策略之间的差异。计算了各种应对策略与新冠疫情应激之间的相关性。结果表明,寻求社会支持是最常用的应对策略。未发现任何应对策略的使用与新冠疫情应激之间存在显著相关性。所提出的VIRUS模型充分捕捉了新冠疫情的压力体验。新冠疫情应激量表(CSS)是一个包含21个条目的量表,具有强大的心理测量特性。