Suppr超能文献

一种用于高海拔恶劣野外条件的便携式血气分析仪的验证

Validation of a Portable Blood Gas Analyzer for Use in Challenging Field Conditions at High Altitude.

作者信息

Nawrocki Janek, Furian Michael, Buergin Aline, Mayer Laura, Schneider Simon, Mademilov Maamed, Bloch Madeleine S, Sooronbaev Talant M, Ulrich Silvia, Bloch Konrad E

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sleep Disorders Center, University Hospital of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.

National Center of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2021 Jan 8;11:600551. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.600551. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Novel, portable blood gas analyzers (BGAs) may serve as essential point-of-care tools in remote regions, during air travel or in ambulance services but they have not been extensively validated.

RESEARCH QUESTION

We compared accuracy of a portable BGA to a validated stationary device.

METHODS

In healthy individuals and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease participating in clinical field studies at different altitudes, arterial blood samples were obtained at rest and during exercise in a hospital at 760 m and in a high altitude clinic at 3100 m. Paired measurements by a portable BGA (EPOC, Siemens Healthcare) and a stationary BGA (Rapidpoint500, Siemens Healthcare) were performed to compute bias (mean difference) and limits of agreement (95% CI of bias).

RESULTS

Of 105 individuals, 248 arterial blood samples were analyzed, 108 at 760 m, 140 at 3100 m. Ranges of values measured by portable BGA were: pH 7.241-7.473, PaCO 21.5-52.5 mmHg, and PaO 45.5-107.1 mmHg. Bias (95% CI) between devices were: pH 0.007 (-0.029 to 0.044), PaCO -0.3 mmHg (-4.8 to 4.2), and PaO -0.2 mmHg (-9.1 to 4.7). For pH, agreement between devices was improved by the equation to correct pH by portable BGA = -1.37 + pH × 1.19; bias after correction -0.007 (-0.023 to 0.009). The portable BGA was easily handled and worked reliably.

INTERPRETATION

Accuracy of blood gas analysis by the portable BGA in comparison to the reference BGA was adequate for clinical use. Because of portability and ease of handling, portable BGA are valuable diagnostic tools for use in everyday practice as well as under challenging field conditions.

摘要

背景

新型便携式血气分析仪(BGA)可作为偏远地区、航空旅行或救护服务中重要的床旁检测工具,但尚未得到广泛验证。

研究问题

我们将便携式BGA的准确性与经过验证的固定式设备进行了比较。

方法

在不同海拔参与临床现场研究的健康个体和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中,于海拔760米的医院和海拔3100米的高海拔诊所,在静息和运动状态下采集动脉血样本。使用便携式BGA(EPOC,西门子医疗)和固定式BGA(Rapidpoint500,西门子医疗)进行配对测量,以计算偏差(平均差值)和一致性界限(偏差的95%置信区间)。

结果

105名个体共分析了248份动脉血样本,其中海拔760米处108份,海拔3100米处140份。便携式BGA测量值范围为:pH值7.241 - 7.473,动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)21.5 - 52.5 mmHg,动脉血氧分压(PaO₂)45.5 - 107.1 mmHg。两台设备之间的偏差(95%置信区间)为:pH值0.007(-0.029至0.044),PaCO₂ -0.3 mmHg(-4.8至4.2),PaO₂ -0.2 mmHg(-9.1至4.7)。对于pH值,通过便携式BGA校正pH值的公式可提高两台设备之间的一致性:便携式BGA校正后的pH值 = -1.37 + pH值×1.19;校正后的偏差为-0.007(-0.023至0.009)。便携式BGA操作简便且工作可靠。

解读

与参考BGA相比,便携式BGA的血气分析准确性足以用于临床。由于其便携性和易于操作,便携式BGA是日常实践以及具有挑战性的现场条件下有价值的诊断工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a468/7820720/9831e7fd22a5/fphys-11-600551-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验