• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

威权领导对员工不道德行为的涓滴效应:一个跨层次有调节的中介模型。

The Trickle-Down Effect of Authoritarian Leadership on Unethical Employee Behavior: A Cross-Level Moderated Mediation Model.

作者信息

Rui Jiang, Qi Lin Xin

机构信息

Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing, China.

School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 6;11:550082. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.550082. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.550082
PMID:33488436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7815699/
Abstract

Authoritarian leadership is of great significance to eastern countries, including China. Meanwhile, unethical employee behavior also exists in all types of social organizations. The relationship between authoritarian leadership and unethical employee behavior is worth studying. Senior leaders (managers) often do not have a direct influence on employees except for through their immediate supervisors. The leadership style of senior leaders also influences the leadership style of their subordinates (employees' direct supervisors). This paper studies how authoritarian manager leadership trickles down to unethical employee behavior through authoritarian supervisor leadership (through social learning theory and ASA theory) and discusses the moderating effect of leader member exchange (LMX) and an ethical climate. Through a questionnaire survey of 406 pairs of leaders, supervisors, and employees, the research results of the multilevel model show that (1) authoritarian supervisor leadership is positively related to unethical employee behavior, (2) authoritarian supervisor leadership mediates the relationship between authoritarian manager leadership and unethical employee behavior, (3) LMX positively moderates the relationship between authoritarian manager leadership and authoritarian supervisor leadership and moderates the mediating effect of authoritarian supervisor leadership, and (4), that an ethical climate negatively moderates the relationship between authoritarian supervisor leadership and unethical employee behavior and moderates the mediating effect of authoritarian supervisor leadership.

摘要

专制型领导对包括中国在内的东方国家具有重要意义。同时,不道德的员工行为也存在于各类社会组织中。专制型领导与不道德的员工行为之间的关系值得研究。高层领导者(管理者)通常除了通过直属上级外,对员工没有直接影响。高层领导者的领导风格也会影响其下属(员工的直接上级)的领导风格。本文研究专制型管理者领导如何通过专制型上级领导(通过社会学习理论和ASA理论)向下传递至不道德的员工行为,并探讨领导成员交换(LMX)和道德氛围的调节作用。通过对406对领导者、上级和员工进行问卷调查,多层次模型的研究结果表明:(1)专制型上级领导与不道德的员工行为呈正相关;(2)专制型上级领导在专制型管理者领导与不道德的员工行为之间起中介作用;(3)LMX正向调节专制型管理者领导与专制型上级领导之间的关系,并调节专制型上级领导的中介作用;(4)道德氛围负向调节专制型上级领导与不道德的员工行为之间的关系,并调节专制型上级领导的中介作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/111b/7815699/6c249fe48fa4/fpsyg-11-550082-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/111b/7815699/8c52bbaaba30/fpsyg-11-550082-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/111b/7815699/2df52e260161/fpsyg-11-550082-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/111b/7815699/6c249fe48fa4/fpsyg-11-550082-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/111b/7815699/8c52bbaaba30/fpsyg-11-550082-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/111b/7815699/2df52e260161/fpsyg-11-550082-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/111b/7815699/6c249fe48fa4/fpsyg-11-550082-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Trickle-Down Effect of Authoritarian Leadership on Unethical Employee Behavior: A Cross-Level Moderated Mediation Model.威权领导对员工不道德行为的涓滴效应:一个跨层次有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 6;11:550082. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.550082. eCollection 2020.
2
Research on the Influencing Mechanism of Paradoxical Leadership on Unethical Pro-Supervisor Behavior.矛盾型领导对亲上级不道德行为的影响机制研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Jul 14;12(7):231. doi: 10.3390/bs12070231.
3
The effect of benevolent leadership on safety behavior: A moderated mediation model.仁慈型领导对安全行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
J Safety Res. 2023 Jun;85:31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
4
Leader sleep devaluation, employee sleep, and unethical behavior.领导者睡眠贬值、员工睡眠与不道德行为。
Sleep Health. 2020 Jun;6(3):411-417.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
5
Employee Voice: A Mechanism to Harness Employees' Potential for Sustainable Success.员工声音:挖掘员工潜力实现可持续成功的机制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;19(2):921. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020921.
6
Effects of Authoritarian Leadership on Employees' Safety Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model.威权型领导对员工安全行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 12;10:846842. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.846842. eCollection 2022.
7
Impact of authentic leadership on employee turnover intention: Perceived supervisor support as mediator and organizational identification as moderator.真实领导对员工离职意愿的影响:以感知到的上级支持为中介变量、组织认同为调节变量
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 24;14:1009639. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1009639. eCollection 2023.
8
The Positive Effect of Authoritarian Leadership on Employee Performance: The Moderating Role of Power Distance.专制领导对员工绩效的积极影响:权力距离的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 23;9:357. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00357. eCollection 2018.
9
The Influence of Authoritarian-Benevolent Leadership on Subordinates' Work Engagement: A Social Information Processing Perspective.专制-仁慈型领导对下属工作投入的影响:社会信息加工视角
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Sep 13;16:3805-3819. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S422961. eCollection 2023.
10
Impact of relational leadership on employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior: A survey based on tourism companies in four countries.关系型领导对员工不道德亲组织行为的影响:基于四国旅游企业的调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 9;14(12):e0225706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225706. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
The associations between benevolent leadership, affective commitment, work engagement and helping behavior of nurses: a cross-sectional study.仁慈领导、情感承诺、工作投入与护士帮助行为之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Oct 30;22(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01581-6.
2
Can Organizational Identification Weaken the Negative Effects of Customer Bullying?-Testing the Moderating Effect of Organizational Identification.组织认同能否减轻顾客霸凌的负面影响?——检验组织认同的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2022 May 31;13:769087. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.769087. eCollection 2022.
3
Effects of Authoritarian Leadership on Employees' Safety Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model.

本文引用的文献

1
Not all differentiation is the same: Examining the moderating effects of leader-member exchange (LMX) configurations.并非所有的差异化都是相同的:考察领导-成员交换(LMX)配置的调节效应。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 May;103(5):478-495. doi: 10.1037/apl0000262. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
2
Supervisor-employee power distance incompatibility, gender similarity, and relationship conflict: A test of interpersonal interaction theory.上下级权力距离不兼容、性别相似性与关系冲突:对人际互动理论的检验。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Mar;103(3):334-346. doi: 10.1037/apl0000265. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
3
Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions.
威权型领导对员工安全行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 12;10:846842. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.846842. eCollection 2022.
4
Effects of Ambidextrous Leadership on Employees' Work Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment.双元领导对员工工作行为的影响:心理授权的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 16;13:862799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862799. eCollection 2022.
5
Leader Psychological Need Satisfaction Trickles Down: The Role of Leader-Member Exchange.领导者心理需求满足的涓滴效应:领导-成员交换关系的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;13:799921. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.799921. eCollection 2022.
6
"Lubricant" or "Stumbling Block"?: The Paradoxical Association Between Team Authoritarian Leadership and Creative Deviance.“润滑剂”还是“绊脚石”?团队专制领导与创造性越轨之间的矛盾关联
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 31;13:835970. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835970. eCollection 2022.
调节中介假设的处理:理论、方法与建议。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):185-227. doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316.
4
Unethical for the sake of the group: risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior.为了群体而不道德:社会排斥风险和亲群体不道德行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jan;100(1):98-113. doi: 10.1037/a0036708. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
5
(Un)ethical behavior in organizations.组织中的(不)道德行为。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:635-60. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143745. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
6
Abusive supervision and subordinates' organization deviance.辱骂性监督与下属的组织越轨行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Jul;93(4):721-32. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.721.
7
Development of a measure of workplace deviance.一种工作场所偏差行为测量方法的开发。
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Jun;85(3):349-60. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349.