Merkt Helene, Wangmo Tenzin, Pageau Félix, Liebrenz Michael, Devaud Cornaz Corinne, Elger Bernice
Insitute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 6;11:592638. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592638. eCollection 2020.
Mental health professionals working in correctional contexts engage a double role to care and control. This dual loyalty conflict has repeatedly been criticized to impede the development of a high-quality alliance. As therapeutic alliance is a robust predictor of outcome measures of psychotherapy, it is essential to investigate the effects of this ethical dilemma.
This qualitative interview study investigates patients' perceptions of their therapists' dual role conflict in court-mandated treatment settings. We interviewed 41 older incarcerated persons using a semi-structured interview guide, the interviews were subsequently analyzed following thematic analysis.
We first present the patients' perceptions of their treating psychotherapist's dual loyalty conflict, which was linked to their overall treatment experience. In a second step, we outline the study participants' reasons for this judgment, which were most commonly linked to feelings of trust or betrayal. More specifically, they named certain therapist characteristics and activities that enabled them to develop a trustful therapeutic alliance, which we grouped into four topics: (1) respecting the patient's pace and perceived coercion; (2) patient health needs to be first priority; (3) clarity in roles and responsibilities; and (4) the art of communication - between transparency and unchecked information sharing.
Developing a high quality alliance in mandatory offender treatment is central due to its relationship with recovery and desistance. Our findings show that some therapists' characteristics and activities attenuate the negative impact of their double role on the development and maintenance of the alliance. To increase the effectiveness of court-mandated treatments, we need to support clinicians in dealing with their dual role to allow the formation of a high quality therapeutic alliance. Our qualitative interview study contributed to this much-needed empirical research on therapist' characteristics promoting a trustful relationship in correctional settings.
在惩教环境中工作的心理健康专业人员承担着关怀与控制的双重角色。这种双重忠诚冲突屡屡受到批评,被认为阻碍了高质量治疗联盟的发展。由于治疗联盟是心理治疗结果指标的有力预测因素,因此调查这一伦理困境的影响至关重要。
这项定性访谈研究调查了患者在法庭强制治疗环境中对治疗师双重角色冲突的看法。我们使用半结构化访谈指南对41名老年在押人员进行了访谈,随后按照主题分析法对访谈进行了分析。
我们首先呈现患者对其治疗心理治疗师双重忠诚冲突的看法,这与他们的整体治疗体验相关。在第二步中,我们概述了研究参与者做出这一判断的原因,这些原因最常与信任或背叛的感觉相关。更具体地说,他们列举了某些治疗师的特征和活动,这些使他们能够建立起信任的治疗联盟,我们将其归纳为四个主题:(1)尊重患者的节奏和感知到的强制;(2)患者的健康需求应是首要优先事项;(3)角色和职责明确;(4)沟通的艺术——在透明度和无节制的信息共享之间。
在强制性罪犯治疗中建立高质量联盟至关重要,因为它与康复和停止犯罪有关。我们的研究结果表明,一些治疗师的特征和活动减轻了他们双重角色对联盟发展和维持的负面影响。为了提高法庭强制治疗的有效性,我们需要支持临床医生应对他们的双重角色,以促成高质量治疗联盟的形成。我们的定性访谈研究为这一急需的实证研究做出了贡献,该研究关注在惩教环境中促进信任关系的治疗师特征。