Suppr超能文献

电外科设备:医源性损伤及法医学方面。意大利法律规定、经验及文献综述。

Electrosurgical unit: Iatrogenic injuries and medico-legal aspect. Italian legal rules, experience and article review.

作者信息

Gualniera Patrizia, Scurria Serena, Sapienza Daniela, Asmundo Alessio

机构信息

Departmental Section of Legal Medicine, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, A.O.U. "G. Martino" Via Consolare Valeria n. 1, 98124, Messina, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jan 4;62:26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.031. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of the electrosurgical unit (ESU) is well-established in the surgical practice. The Authors, to better understand the genesis of injuries connected to the use of electrosurgical instruments, conducted an in-depth literature review pertaining to this topic.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Using the most important medical databases, a research of experimental studies in the last 20 years was conducted.

RESULTS

The analysis of the mechanisms responsible for the lesions showed that high energy devices remain as the most common cause of injury. Adverse events are mainly given by thermal injuries; cases of electromagnetic interference are also described in patients with pacemakers or sacral nerve stimulator and spinal stimulators as well as cases of fire of the endotracheal tube in the course of tracheostomy for the use of the electrosurgical unit in an environment with a high concentration of oxygen or anesthetic gases. Also reported in the literature are individual cases of fires caused by sparks from the electrosurgical handpiece also for the use of disinfectants and/or in relation to surgical drapes.

CONCLUSION

In order to clearly define the medical-legal aspects, focusing on the professional responsibility of the surgical and nursing staff, the authors' attention was brought to the need for an effective prevention plan that highlights not only the importance of an accurate procedural knowledge in order to safety use the electrosurgical instruments, but also the need for a system that monitors any complications or adverse events resulting from the use of such instruments.

摘要

背景

电外科设备(ESU)在外科手术实践中的应用已得到广泛认可。作者为了更好地了解与使用电外科器械相关的损伤成因,对该主题进行了深入的文献综述。

材料与方法

利用最重要的医学数据库,对过去20年的实验研究进行了检索。

结果

对造成损伤的机制分析表明,高能设备仍是最常见的损伤原因。不良事件主要由热损伤引起;在使用起搏器、骶神经刺激器和脊髓刺激器的患者中也有电磁干扰的病例报告,以及在高浓度氧气或麻醉气体环境中使用电外科设备进行气管切开术时气管内导管起火的病例。文献中还报道了个别因电外科手持器械产生的火花引发火灾的案例,这些案例还涉及消毒剂的使用和/或手术巾。

结论

为了明确界定医疗法律方面的问题,关注手术和护理人员的职业责任,作者们注意到需要制定一个有效的预防计划,该计划不仅要强调准确的操作知识对于安全使用电外科器械的重要性,还要建立一个监测使用此类器械所导致的任何并发症或不良事件的系统。

相似文献

2
Endotracheal tube fire during tracheostomy: a case report.
Ear Nose Throat J. 2002 Feb;81(2):90-2.
6
Guidelines in Practice: Electrosurgical Safety.实践指南:电外科安全。
AORN J. 2021 Jul;114(1):60-72. doi: 10.1002/aorn.13421.
7
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.

本文引用的文献

8
A patient with intraoral fire during tonsillectomy.
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Sep;25(5):1822-4. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001036.
9
Airway fire during tracheostomy.气管切开术中气道着火。
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2014 Jun;131(3):197-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2013.07.001. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验