Suppr超能文献

晚期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变型肺腺癌患者一线酪氨酸激酶抑制剂及后续全身化疗药物的治疗选择:来自台湾癌症登记队列的启示

Treatment Options of First-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Subsequent Systemic Chemotherapy Agents for Advanced EGFR Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients: Implications From Taiwan Cancer Registry Cohort.

作者信息

Liang Sheng-Kai, Keng Li-Ta, Chang Chia-Hao, Wen Yueh-Feng, Lee Meng-Rui, Yang Ching-Yao, Wang Jann-Yuan, Ko Jen-Chung, Shih Jin-Yuan, Yu Chong-Jen

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu City, Taiwan.

Institute of Biotechnology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Jan 8;10:590356. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.590356. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Large-scale, population-based real-world studies on the treatment outcomes of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and subsequent systemic chemotherapy agents for lung adenocarcinoma (with activating epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] mutations) remain limited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 2014 to December 2016, patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, identified from the Taiwan Cancer Registry were included in this study if they received any of the three TKIs as first-line treatment. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome was time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD).

RESULTS

A total of 4,889 patients (median age: 67 years and two-thirds with distant metastasis) were recruited (1,778 gefitinib, 1,599 erlotinib, and 1,512 afatinib users). A 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matched cohorts of 1,228 afatinib/erlotinib and 1054 afatinib/gefitinib was created. After PS matching, it was found that afatinib was not associated with better OS (afatinib vs. erlotinib, HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.86-1.07; afatinib vs. gefitinib, HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.81-1.02). In the subgroup analysis, afatinib demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with active smoking (afatinib vs. erlotinib, HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.93; afatinib vs. gefitinib, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.94) and ECOG > 1 (afatinib vs. erlotinib, HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-0.99; afatinib vs. gefitinib, HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.98). A total of 41.1% (n = 1992) of first-line TKI users received subsequent chemotherapy. Among the three TKI groups, pemetrexed usage was associated with better OS compared with other chemotherapy agents, with the exception of gemcitabine in the afatinib and gefitinib groups. Pemetrexed and gemcitabine had the longest TTD of 3-4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with mutant lung adenocarcinoma, afatinib use may not provide longer OS compared with first-generation TKIs. Afatinib may be preferably considered among patients with active smoking and should not be withheld among those with worse performance status. With 40% of patients receiving subsequent chemotherapy, pemetrexed may be the preferred agent, while gemcitabine can be a reasonable alternative.

摘要

目的

关于一线酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)及后续全身化疗药物治疗肺腺癌(伴有表皮生长因子受体[EGFR]激活突变)的大规模、基于人群的真实世界研究仍然有限。

材料与方法

2014年3月至2016年12月,从台湾癌症登记处识别出的晚期肺腺癌患者若接受三种TKIs中的任何一种作为一线治疗,则纳入本研究。主要结局为总生存期(OS)。次要结局为治疗中断时间(TTD)。

结果

共招募了4889例患者(中位年龄:67岁,三分之二有远处转移)(1778例吉非替尼使用者、1599例厄洛替尼使用者和1512例阿法替尼使用者)。创建了1228例阿法替尼/厄洛替尼和1054例阿法替尼/吉非替尼的1:1倾向评分(PS)匹配队列。PS匹配后发现,阿法替尼与更好的OS无关(阿法替尼对比厄洛替尼,HR:0.96,95%CI:0.86 - 1.07;阿法替尼对比吉非替尼,HR:0.91,95%CI:0.81 - 1.02)。在亚组分析中,阿法替尼在现吸烟者(阿法替尼对比厄洛替尼,HR:0.69,95%CI:0.51 - 0.93;阿法替尼对比吉非替尼,HR:0.67,95%CI:0.48 - 0.94)和东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分>1的患者中显示出生存获益(阿法替尼对比厄洛替尼,HR:0.79,95%CI:0.63 - 0.99;阿法替尼对比吉非替尼,HR:0.78,95%CI:0.62 - 0.98)。41.1%(n = 1992)的一线TKI使用者接受了后续化疗。在三个TKI组中,与其他化疗药物相比,培美曲塞的使用与更好的OS相关,但阿法替尼组和吉非替尼组中的吉西他滨除外。培美曲塞和吉西他滨的TTD最长,为3 - 4个月。

结论

在伴有EGFR突变的肺腺癌患者中,与第一代TKIs相比,使用阿法替尼可能不会提供更长的OS。对于现吸烟者,可优先考虑使用阿法替尼,对于身体状况较差的患者不应拒绝使用。40%的患者接受了后续化疗,培美曲塞可能是首选药物,而吉西他滨可以是合理的替代药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0e5/7821751/be74613c8232/fonc-10-590356-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验