Suppr超能文献

比较表皮生长因子受体突变的晚期肺腺癌患者一线酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的生存率及后续治疗情况。

Comparing survival and subsequent treatment of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients of advanced lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation.

作者信息

Huang Ming-Yi, Hsieh Kun-Pin, Huang Ru-Yu, Hung Jen-Yu, Chen Li-Tzong, Tsai Ming-Ju, Yang Yi-Hsin

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Formos Med Assoc. 2022 Jan;121(1 Pt 1):170-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Three first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are widely available to treat advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutation. However, studies comparing efficacy or effectiveness of these EGFR TKIs came out with inconclusive results.

METHODS

In this real-world data analysis with a nationwide retrospective cohort design, adult patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutation between 2011 and 2016, who received a first-line EGFR TKI, were included. Overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were compared between patients receiving different EGFR TKIs after overlap weighting.

RESULTS

We enrolled 10,431 patients, including 6,230, 2,359, and 1842 in gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib groups, respectively. The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) OS were 24.2 (22.9-26.2), 25.7 (24.0-27.9), and 29.1 (25.8-32.1) months for those receiving gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib, respectively (p = 0.001). The hazard ratios (95% CI) for the afatinib group were 0.85 (0.74-0.98) and 0.91 (0.79-1.05) comparing with the gefitinib and erlotinib groups, respectively. The median (95% CI) TTNT were 10.9 (10.4-11.2), 11.7 (11.3-12.1), 13.4 (12.5-14.3) months for those receiving gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib, respectively (p < 0.001). The hazard ratios (95% CI) for the afatinib group were 0.79 (0.70-0.88) and 0.89 (0.79-1.00) comparing with the gefitinib and erlotinib groups, respectively. There were 6111 (59%) patients receiving subsequent therapies, and the majority of them received a second-line chemotherapy, particularly platinum-based chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Afatinib, compared with gefitinib, might provide better effectiveness as the first-line targeted therapy for patients of advanced lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutation.

摘要

背景/目的:三种一线表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)可广泛用于治疗携带EGFR突变的晚期肺腺癌。然而,比较这些EGFR TKIs疗效或有效性的研究结果尚无定论。

方法

在这项采用全国性回顾性队列设计的真实世界数据分析中,纳入了2011年至2016年间新诊断为携带EGFR突变的晚期肺腺癌且接受一线EGFR TKI治疗的成年患者。在进行重叠加权后,比较接受不同EGFR TKIs治疗的患者的总生存期(OS)和下次治疗时间(TTNT)。

结果

我们共纳入10431例患者,吉非替尼组、厄洛替尼组和阿法替尼组分别有6230例、2359例和1842例。接受吉非替尼、厄洛替尼和阿法替尼治疗的患者的中位(95%置信区间[CI])OS分别为24.2(22.9 - 26.2)个月、25.7(24.0 - 27.9)个月和29.1(25.8 - 32.1)个月(p = 0.001)。与吉非替尼组和厄洛替尼组相比,阿法替尼组的风险比(95%CI)分别为0.85(0.74 - 0.98)和0.91(0.79 - 1.05)。接受吉非替尼、厄洛替尼和阿法替尼治疗的患者的中位(95%CI)TTNT分别为10.9(10.4 - 11.2)个月、11.7(11.3 - 12.1)个月和13.4(12.5 - 14.3)个月(p < 0.001)。与吉非替尼组和厄洛替尼组相比,阿法替尼组的风险比(95%CI)分别为0.79(0.70 - 0.88)和0.89(0.79 - 1.00)。有6111例(59%)患者接受了后续治疗,其中大多数接受了二线化疗,尤其是铂类化疗。

结论

与吉非替尼相比,阿法替尼作为一线靶向治疗药物,对携带EGFR突变的晚期肺腺癌患者可能具有更好的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验