Oft Dominik, Schmidt Manuel Alexander, Weissmann Thomas, Roesch Johannes, Mengling Veit, Masitho Siti, Bert Christoph, Lettmaier Sebastian, Frey Benjamin, Distel Luitpold Valentin, Fietkau Rainer, Putz Florian
Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Department of Neuroradiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Front Oncol. 2021 Jan 8;10:590980. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.590980. eCollection 2020.
There is insufficient understanding of the natural course of volumetric regression in brain metastases after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and optimal volumetric criteria for the assessment of response and progression in radiotherapy clinical trials for brain metastases are currently unknown.
Volumetric analysis whole-tumor segmentation in contrast-enhanced 1 mm³-isotropic T1-Mprage sequences before SRT and during follow-up. A total of 3,145 MRI studies of 419 brain metastases from 189 patients were segmented. Progression was defined using a volumetric extension of the RANO-BM criteria. A subset of 205 metastases without progression/radionecrosis during their entire follow-up of at least 3 months was used to study the natural course of volumetric regression after SRT. Predictors for volumetric regression were investigated. A second subset of 179 metastases was used to investigate the prognostic significance of volumetric response at 3 months (defined as ≥20% and ≥65% volume reduction, respectively) for subsequent local control.
Median relative metastasis volume post-SRT was 66.9% at 6 weeks, 38.6% at 3 months, 17.7% at 6 months, 2.7% at 12 months and 0.0% at 24 months. Radioresistant histology and FSRT vs. SRS were associated with reduced tumor regression for all time points. In multivariate linear regression, radiosensitive histology (p=0.006) was the only significant predictor for metastasis regression at 3 months. Volumetric regression ≥20% at 3 months post-SRT was the only significant prognostic factor for subsequent control in multivariate analysis (HR 0.63, p=0.023), whereas regression ≥65% was no significant predictor.
Volumetric regression post-SRT does not occur at a constant rate but is most pronounced in the first 6 weeks to 3 months. Despite decreasing over time, volumetric regression continues beyond 6 months post-radiotherapy and may lead to complete resolution of controlled lesions by 24 months. Radioresistant histology is associated with slower regression. We found that a cutoff of ≥20% regression for the volumetric definition of response at 3 months post-SRT was predictive for subsequent control whereas the currently proposed definition of ≥65% was not. These results have implications for standardized volumetric criteria in future radiotherapy trials for brain metastases.
对于立体定向放射治疗(SRT)后脑转移瘤体积退缩的自然病程了解不足,目前尚不清楚脑转移瘤放射治疗临床试验中评估反应和进展的最佳体积标准。
在SRT前及随访期间,对增强的1mm³各向同性T1-Mprage序列中的全肿瘤分割进行体积分析。对189例患者的419个脑转移瘤进行了共计3145次MRI研究的分割。使用RANO-BM标准的体积扩展来定义进展。在至少3个月的整个随访期间无进展/放射性坏死的205个转移瘤子集用于研究SRT后体积退缩的自然病程。研究了体积退缩的预测因素。179个转移瘤的第二个子集用于研究3个月时体积反应(分别定义为体积减少≥20%和≥65%)对后续局部控制的预后意义。
SRT后转移瘤的中位相对体积在6周时为66.9%,3个月时为38.6%,6个月时为17.7%,12个月时为2.7%,24个月时为0.0%。放射抗拒组织学以及分次立体定向放射治疗(FSRT)与立体定向放射外科治疗(SRS)相比,在所有时间点均与肿瘤退缩减少相关。在多变量线性回归中,放射敏感组织学(p=0.006)是3个月时转移瘤退缩的唯一显著预测因素。SRT后3个月时体积退缩≥20%是多变量分析中后续控制的唯一显著预后因素(风险比0.63,p=0.023),而退缩≥65%不是显著的预测因素。
SRT后的体积退缩并非以恒定速率发生,而是在最初6周至3个月最为明显。尽管随着时间推移而减少,但体积退缩在放疗后6个月后仍会持续,并且可能在24个月时导致受控病灶完全消退。放射抗拒组织学与退缩较慢相关。我们发现,SRT后3个月时体积反应的体积定义中≥20%的退缩阈值可预测后续控制,而目前提议的≥65%的定义则不然。这些结果对未来脑转移瘤放射治疗试验中的标准化体积标准具有启示意义。