Suppr超能文献

德国紧急服务的充分利用:是否存在移民背景的差异?

Adequate Utilization of Emergency Services in Germany: Is There a Differential by Migration Background?

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, Bielefeld School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Centre for Statistics, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 8;8:613250. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.613250. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The role of emergency services (ES) is to provide round-the-clock acute care. In recent years, inadequate use of ES has been internationally thematised because of overcrowding and the associated cost. Evidence shows that migrant populations tend to use more ES than non-migrant but it remains to show if there is a differential in inadequacy. Quantitative data from consecutive patients visiting three ES in Berlin (hospital-based outpatient clinics for internal medicine or gynecology) from July 2017 to July 2018 were obtained. Utilization was defined as adequate if the patient was admitted to hospital and/or if all of the three following criteria were fulfilled: reported to have been sent by medical staff; reported strong pain; and reported a high urgency (both ≥7, scale from 0 to 10). Differences between migrants (1st generation), their offspring (2nd generation), and non-migrants were evaluated using logistic regression. Of the 2,327 patients included, 901 had a migration background. Adjusting for gender, age, gynecological hospital-based outpatient clinic, and the number of chronic diseases, 1st generation migrant patients ( = 633) had significantly lower odds than non-migrants to have an adequate utilization of services [OR 0.78, 95% confidence interval (0.62, 0.99), -value 0.046]. For 2nd generation patients ( = 268), no statistically significant difference was found [OR 0.80, 95% confidence interval (0.56, 1.15), -value 0.231]. Only adjusting for gynecological hospital-based outpatient clinic did weaken the association between migration status on adequacy but interactions between type of hospital-based outpatient clinic and migration were not significant. First generation migrants show lower odds of adequate ES use compared to non-migrants. Only visiting a gynecological hospital-based outpatient clinic as opposed to internal medicine could partly explain the lower odds of adequate use among immigrants. This indicates a need for structural changes in the healthcare system: The threshold of access to general practices needs to be lowered, considering the needs of diverse subgroups of migrant patients.

摘要

急救服务(ES)的作用是提供 24 小时急性护理。近年来,由于过度拥挤和相关成本,国际上一直存在 ES 使用不足的问题。有证据表明,移民人口使用 ES 的比例高于非移民,但仍需证明其使用不足的程度是否存在差异。

我们获得了 2017 年 7 月至 2018 年 7 月期间在柏林的三家 ES(内科或妇科的医院门诊)连续就诊的患者的定量数据。如果患者住院治疗,并且/或者满足以下三个标准,则将利用率定义为充分:由医务人员派遣;自述有强烈疼痛;自述紧急程度高(均为≥7,0 至 10 分制)。使用逻辑回归评估移民(第一代)、其后代(第二代)和非移民之间的差异。

在纳入的 2327 名患者中,有 901 人有移民背景。调整性别、年龄、妇科医院门诊和慢性疾病数量后,第一代移民患者(n=633)就诊服务利用率显著低于非移民患者[比值比 0.78,95%置信区间(0.62,0.99),-值 0.046]。对于第二代患者(n=268),未发现统计学上的显著差异[比值比 0.80,95%置信区间(0.56,1.15),-值 0.231]。仅调整妇科医院门诊会削弱移民身份对充分性的关联,但医院门诊类型和移民之间的交互作用并不显著。

第一代移民就诊服务利用率较低。与内科相比,仅到妇科医院门诊就诊可能部分解释了移民就诊服务利用率较低的原因。这表明医疗保健系统需要进行结构性变革:需要降低一般实践的准入门槛,以考虑到不同移民患者亚组的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9e5/7820806/f1189ea7a48a/fpubh-08-613250-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验