College of Agriculture, Otis L. Floyd Nursery Research Center, Tennessee State University, McMinnville, TN.
USDA-ARS, U.S. National Arboretum, Otis L. Floyd Nursery Research Center, McMinnville, TN.
Environ Entomol. 2021 Apr 23;50(2):317-323. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvaa184.
Red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta Buren; RIFA) and black imported fire ant (Solenopsis richteri Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae); BIFA) are considered distinct species with introgression via a reproductively functional hybrid (HIFA). The RIFA and BIFA common names are based on relative coloration. Due to human color perception variation, using color to identify RIFA, BIFA or HIFA is challenging. Fire ant identification traditionally involves molecular or chemical techniques, but a colorimetric test could allow rapid and low-cost identification. In this study, ant integument coloration was measured by spectrophotometer, and color attributes were compared to a combined gas chromatography (GC) index derived from cuticular hydrocarbon and venom alkaloid indices. Significant Pearson Correlation coefficients were found for colony GC index versus color attributes red to green (a*), blue to yellow (b*), chroma (C*), and hue (h*), but not lightness (L*). The RIFA colonies were distinct from BIFA for four of five color attributes and plots of the ab and Ch horizontal axis of the Lab* and LCh* color spaces. Color attributes for HIFA indices were not distinct from BIFA and RIFA parental species, but HIFA ab and Ch plots were distinct from RIFA and ab plots from BIFA. Color attributes a*, b*, and C* increased and h* decreased with GC index in a sinusoidal pattern. In conclusion, most RIFA and BIFA color attributes were distinct and ab and Ch color axes plots had potential to distinguish HIFA from parental species, but coloration of HIFA indices was variable and complicated identifications among HIFA phenotypes, RIFA and BIFA.
红火蚁(Solenopsis invicta Buren;RIFA)和黑火蚁(Solenopsis richteri Forel(膜翅目:蚁科);BIFA)被认为是具有通过生殖功能杂种(HIFA)发生基因渗入的不同物种。RIFA 和 BIFA 的通用名称基于相对颜色。由于人类的颜色感知存在差异,因此使用颜色来识别 RIFA、BIFA 或 HIFA 具有挑战性。传统上,火蚁的鉴定涉及分子或化学技术,但比色测试可以实现快速和低成本的鉴定。在这项研究中,使用分光光度计测量蚂蚁表皮的颜色,并将颜色属性与源自表皮碳氢化合物和毒液生物碱指数的组合气相色谱(GC)指数进行比较。发现群体 GC 指数与颜色属性之间存在显著的 Pearson 相关系数,包括从红色到绿色(a*)、蓝色到黄色(b*)、彩度(C*)和色调(h*),但不包括亮度(L*)。RIFA 群体在五个颜色属性中的四个方面与 BIFA 不同,并且在 Lab和 LCh颜色空间的 ab和 Ch水平轴上的 HIFA 指数的图。HIFA 指数的颜色属性与 BIFA 和 RIFA 亲本物种没有明显区别,但 HIFA 的 ab和 Ch图与 RIFA 不同,而 BIFA 的 ab图与 RIFA 不同。颜色属性 a*、b和 C随着 GC 指数呈正弦模式增加,而 h则减少。总之,大多数 RIFA 和 BIFA 的颜色属性都很明显,并且 ab和 Ch*颜色轴图有可能将 HIFA 与亲本物种区分开来,但 HIFA 指数的颜色具有可变性,并且 HIFA 表型、RIFA 和 BIFA 之间的鉴定比较复杂。