Nakashima Ann, Vartanian Oshin, Rhind Shawn G, King Kristen, Tenn Catherine, Jetly Col Rakesh
Defence Research and Development Canada, Toronto Research Centre, Toronto, ON, M3K 2C9, Canada.
Defence Research and Development Canada, Suffield Research Centre, Medicine Hat, AB, T1A 8K5, Canada.
Mil Med. 2022 Jan 4;187(1-2):e201-e208. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa439.
Recently, there has been increasing concern about the adverse health effects of long-term occupational exposure to low-level blast in military personnel. Occupational blast exposure occurs routinely in garrison through use of armaments and controlled blast detonations. In the current study, we focused on a population of breaching instructors and range staff. Breaching is a tactical technique that is used to gain entry into closed spaces, often through the use of explosives.
Initial measurements of blast overpressure collected during breaching courses found that up to 10% of the blasts for range staff and up to 32% of the blasts for instructors exceeded the recommended 3 psi exposure limit. Using a cross-sectional design, we used tests of balance, ataxia, and hearing to compare a sample of breachers (n = 19) to age-and sex-matched military controls (n = 19).
There were no significant differences between the two groups on the balance and ataxia tests, although the average scores of both groups were lower than would be expected in a normative population. The prevalence of hearing loss was low in the breacher group (4 of 19), and hearing thresholds were not significantly different from the controls. However, the prevalence of self-reported tinnitus was significantly higher in the breacher group (12 of 19) compared with the controls (4 of 19), and all breachers who were identified as having hearing loss also reported tinnitus.
Our results suggest that basic tests of balance, ataxia, and hearing on their own were not sensitive to the effects of long-term occupational exposure to low-level blast. Some of the blast exposure levels exceeded limits, and there was a significant association of exposure with tinnitus. Future studies should supplement with additional information including exposure history and functional hearing assessments. These findings should be considered in the design of future acute and longitudinal studies of low-level blast exposure.
最近,人们越来越关注军事人员长期职业性接触低强度爆炸对健康的不利影响。在驻军期间,通过使用武器和控制爆炸引爆,职业性爆炸暴露经常发生。在当前的研究中,我们关注的是爆破教员和靶场工作人员群体。爆破是一种战术技术,通常通过使用炸药进入封闭空间。
在爆破课程中收集的初始爆炸超压测量结果发现,靶场工作人员高达10%的爆炸以及教员高达32%的爆炸超过了建议的3 psi暴露限值。采用横断面设计,我们使用平衡、共济失调和听力测试,将一组爆破人员(n = 19)与年龄和性别匹配的军事对照组(n = 19)进行比较。
两组在平衡和共济失调测试中没有显著差异,尽管两组的平均得分均低于正常人群的预期值。爆破人员组的听力损失患病率较低(19人中有4人),听力阈值与对照组无显著差异。然而,与对照组(19人中有4人)相比,爆破人员组自我报告的耳鸣患病率显著更高(19人中有12人),并且所有被确定有听力损失的爆破人员也报告有耳鸣。
我们的结果表明,单独的平衡、共济失调和听力基本测试对长期职业性接触低强度爆炸的影响不敏感。一些爆炸暴露水平超过了限值,并且暴露与耳鸣之间存在显著关联。未来的研究应补充包括暴露史和功能性听力评估等额外信息。在设计未来关于低强度爆炸暴露的急性和纵向研究时应考虑这些发现。