Department of Psychiatry, 2-126b MEB/Psychiatry Research, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
J Gambl Stud. 2021 Dec;37(4):1231-1243. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-10003-8. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
We examined the association of baseline social, demographic, and clinical predictor variables with course in 48 older (≥ 60 years) and 57 younger (< 40 years) subjects with pathological gambling (PG) in a prospective follow-up study. Weekly gambling activity was tracked and used to categorize PG course. Generalized estimating equation models were used to examine predictors of disordered (i.e., level 2 or 3) gambling. Interaction tests were used to test for differential relationships for older and younger subjects. Predictors of disordered gambling during follow-up included greater severity of PG symptoms, greater severity of depressive symptoms, self-reported childhood neglect, cognitive distortions related to games of chance, and more role limitations due to physical health. Interaction tests showed that the relationships between some risk factors and disordered gambling varied for older and younger adults. Understanding these interrelationships could allow clinicians to more effectively monitor and manage their patients with PG.
我们在一项前瞻性随访研究中,检查了基线社会人口学和临床预测变量与 48 名老年(≥60 岁)和 57 名年轻(<40 岁)病理性赌博(PG)患者病程的相关性。每周的赌博活动被跟踪,并用于对 PG 病程进行分类。广义估计方程模型用于检查紊乱(即 2 级或 3 级)赌博的预测因素。交互检验用于检验老年和年轻受试者之间的差异关系。随访期间紊乱性赌博的预测因素包括 PG 症状严重程度增加、抑郁症状严重程度增加、自我报告的童年忽视、与机会游戏相关的认知扭曲,以及因身体健康而导致的更多角色限制。交互检验表明,一些风险因素与紊乱性赌博之间的关系在老年和年轻成年人中有所不同。了解这些相互关系可以使临床医生更有效地监测和管理他们的 PG 患者。