Considered equal first authors.
J Vet Med Educ. 2021 Oct;48(5):620-628. doi: 10.3138/jvme-2020-0035. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
Indirect fundoscopy is challenging for novice learners, as patients are often intolerant of the procedure, impeding development of proficiency. To address this, we developed a canine ocular simulator that we hypothesized would improve student learning compared to live dogs. Six board-certified veterinary ophthalmologists and 19 second-year veterinary students (novices) performed an indirect fundic examination on the model and live dog. Prior to assessment, novices were introduced to the skill with a standardized teaching protocol and practiced (without feedback) with either the model ( = 10) or live dog ( = 9) for 30 minutes. All participants evaluated realism and usefulness of the model using a Likert-type scale. Performance on the live dog and model was evaluated in all participants using time to completion of task, performance of fundic examination using a checklist and global score, identification of objects in the fundus of the model, and evaluation of time spent looking at the fundus of the model using eye tracking. Novices (trained on simulator or live dogs) were compared in fundic examination performance on the live dog and identification of shapes in the model. In general, experts performed the fundic examination faster ( ≤ .0003) and more proficiently than the novices, although there were no differences in eye tracking behavior between groups ( ≥ .06). No differences were detected between training on simulator versus live dog in development of fundoscopy skills in novices ( ≥ .20). These findings suggest that this canine model may be an effective tool to train students to perform fundoscopy.
间接检眼镜检查对于新手学习者来说具有挑战性,因为患者通常无法耐受该程序,从而阻碍了熟练度的提高。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一种犬眼模拟器,我们假设与活体犬相比,该模拟器将提高学生的学习效果。六位兽医眼科委员会认证专家和 19 名二年级兽医学生(新手)在模型和活体犬上进行了间接眼底检查。在评估之前,新手通过标准化教学方案了解了该技能,并在模型(=10)或活体犬(=9)上进行了 30 分钟的无反馈练习。所有参与者都使用李克特量表评估模型的逼真度和实用性。所有参与者都使用完成任务的时间、眼底检查检查表和总得分、在模型眼底识别物体的能力以及使用眼动追踪评估在模型眼底观察时间的方式来评估活体犬和模型的表现。比较了在活体犬上进行眼底检查的新手(在模拟器或活体犬上接受过训练)的表现以及在模型中识别形状的能力。总的来说,专家完成眼底检查的速度更快(≤0.0003)且更熟练,尽管两组的眼动追踪行为没有差异(≥0.06)。在新手眼底镜技能的发展方面,在模拟器上接受训练与在活体犬上接受训练之间没有差异(≥0.20)。这些发现表明,这种犬科模型可能是一种训练学生进行眼底镜检查的有效工具。