Suppr超能文献

按需心理健康系统中医疗服务利用与焦虑结果之间的关联:回顾性观察研究

Association Between Care Utilization and Anxiety Outcomes in an On-Demand Mental Health System: Retrospective Observational Study.

作者信息

Kunkle Sarah, Yip Manny, Hunt Justin, Ξ Watson, Udall Dana, Arean Patricia, Nierenberg Andrew, Naslund John A

机构信息

Ginger, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jan 26;5(1):e24662. doi: 10.2196/24662.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anxiety is an extremely prevalent condition, and yet, it has received notably less attention than depression and other mental health conditions from a research, clinical, and public health perspective. The COVID-19 pandemic has only exacerbated growing concerns about the burden of anxiety due to the confluence of physical health risks, economic stressors, social isolation, and general disruption of daily activities.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines differences in anxiety outcomes by care modality (coaching, teletherapy and telepsychiatry, and combined care) within an on-demand mental health system. We also explore the association between levels of engagement within each care modality and odds of improvement in symptoms of anxiety.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study of individuals who accessed Ginger, an on-demand mental health system. Data were collected from 1611 Ginger members between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. We used logistic regression to assess the association between care modality and improvement in anxiety symptoms. Within each modality, we assessed the association between level of engagement and improvement.

RESULTS

Of 1611 Ginger members, 761 (47.0%) experienced a decrease in anxiety symptoms, as measured by a change from a positive to a negative 2-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) screen. Among members who still screened positive at follow-up (865/1611, 53%), a total of 192 members (11.9%) experienced a clinically significant score reduction in the full GAD-7 (ie, a score reduction of >5 points), even though their GAD-2 scores were still positive. All modalities showed increased odds of improvement compared to those who were not engaged with coaching or clinical services ("app-only"). Higher GAD-7 intake scores were also associated with decreased odds of improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found increased odds of anxiety improvement for all care modalities compared to those who did not engage in care, with larger effect sizes for higher utilization within all care modalities. Additionally, there is a promising observation that those engaged in combined care (teletherapy and text-based coaching) had the greatest odds of anxiety improvement. Future directions include more detailed classifications of utilization patterns and an exploration of explanations and solutions for lower-utilization members.

摘要

背景

焦虑是一种极为普遍的状况,然而,从研究、临床和公共卫生的角度来看,它受到的关注明显少于抑郁症和其他心理健康状况。由于身体健康风险、经济压力源、社会隔离以及日常活动的普遍中断相互交织,新冠疫情加剧了人们对焦虑负担日益增长的担忧。

目的

本研究考察了按需心理健康系统中不同护理模式(辅导、远程治疗和远程精神病学以及综合护理)在焦虑结果方面的差异。我们还探讨了每种护理模式下的参与程度与焦虑症状改善几率之间的关联。

方法

我们对使用按需心理健康系统Ginger的个体进行了一项回顾性观察研究。数据收集自2018年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间的1611名Ginger会员。我们使用逻辑回归来评估护理模式与焦虑症状改善之间的关联。在每种模式中,我们评估了参与程度与改善情况之间的关联。

结果

在1611名Ginger会员中,761名(47.0%)的焦虑症状有所减轻,这通过从阳性到阴性的2项广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD - 2)筛查变化来衡量。在随访时仍筛查为阳性的会员中(865/1611,53%),共有192名会员(11.9%)在完整的GAD - 7量表上经历了临床上显著的分数降低(即分数降低>五分),尽管他们的GAD - 2分数仍为阳性。与未接受辅导或临床服务(“仅使用应用程序”)的人相比,所有模式都显示出改善几率增加。较高的GAD - 7初始分数也与改善几率降低相关。

结论

本研究发现,与未接受护理的人相比,所有护理模式的焦虑改善几率都有所增加,在所有护理模式中,更高的利用率具有更大的效应量。此外,有一个有前景的观察结果是,接受综合护理(远程治疗和基于文本的辅导)的人焦虑改善的几率最大。未来的方向包括对使用模式进行更详细的分类,以及探索低利用率会员的解释和解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d53/7872836/3d9adeba9157/formative_v5i1e24662_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验