Department of Internal Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.
Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.
Curr Oncol. 2021 Jan 20;28(1):593-605. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28010059.
Studies have shown that aggressive treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oligometastatic disease improves the overall survival (OS) compared to a palliative approach and some immunotherapy checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and T-Lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors are now part of the standard of care for advanced NSCLC. However, the prognostic impact of PD-L1 expression in the oligometastatic setting remains unknown.
Patients with oligometastatic NSCLC were identified from the patient database of the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM). "Oligometastatic disease" definition chosen is one synchronous metastasis based on the M1b staging of the eight IASLC (The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer) Classification (within sixth months of diagnosis) or up to three cerebral metastasis based on the methodology of the previous major phase II randomized study of Gomez et al. We compared the OS between patients receiving aggressive treatment at both metastatic and primary sites (Group A) and patients receiving non-aggressive treatment (Group B). Subgroup analysis was performed using tumor PD-L1 expression.
Among 643 metastatic NSCLC patients, we identified 67 patients with oligometastasis (10%). Median follow-up was 13.3 months. Twenty-nine patients (43%) received radical treatment at metastatic and primary sites (Group A), and 38 patients (57%) received non-aggressive treatment (Group B). The median OS (mOS) of Group A was significantly longer than for Group B (26 months vs. 5 months, = 0.0001). Median progression-free survival (mPFS) of Group A was superior than Group B (17.5 months vs. 3.4 months, = 0.0001). This difference was still significant when controlled for primary tumor staging: stage I ( = 0.316), stage II ( = 0.024), and stage III ( = 0.001). In the cohort of patients who were not treated with PD-L1 inhibitors, PD-L1 expression negatively correlated with mOS.
Aggressive treatments of oligometastatic NSCLC significantly improve mOS and mPFS compared to a more palliative approach. PD-L1 expression is a negative prognostic factor which suggests a possible role for immunotherapy in this setting.
研究表明,与姑息治疗相比,寡转移非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的积极治疗可改善总生存期(OS),一些免疫检查点抑制剂,如抗程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)、抗程序性死亡蛋白 1(PD-1)和 T 淋巴细胞相关抗原 4(CTLA-4)抑制剂,现已成为晚期 NSCLC 的标准治疗方法。然而,寡转移状态下 PD-L1 表达的预后影响仍不清楚。
从蒙特利尔大学中心医院(CHUM)的患者数据库中确定了寡转移性 NSCLC 患者。选择的“寡转移疾病”定义是基于国际肺癌研究协会(IASLC)第八版分期的一个同步转移(诊断后六个月内)或三个脑部转移(基于 Gomez 等人之前的主要 II 期随机研究方法)。我们比较了在转移和原发部位接受积极治疗的患者(A 组)和接受非积极治疗的患者(B 组)的 OS。使用肿瘤 PD-L1 表达进行亚组分析。
在 643 例转移性 NSCLC 患者中,我们确定了 67 例寡转移患者(10%)。中位随访时间为 13.3 个月。29 例(43%)患者在转移和原发部位接受根治性治疗(A 组),38 例(57%)患者接受非积极治疗(B 组)。A 组的中位 OS(mOS)明显长于 B 组(26 个月 vs. 5 个月,=0.0001)。A 组的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)也优于 B 组(17.5 个月 vs. 3.4 个月,=0.0001)。当控制原发肿瘤分期时,这种差异仍然显著:I 期(=0.316)、II 期(=0.024)和 III 期(=0.001)。在未接受 PD-L1 抑制剂治疗的患者队列中,PD-L1 表达与 mOS 呈负相关。
与姑息治疗相比,寡转移性 NSCLC 的积极治疗可显著改善 mOS 和 mPFS。PD-L1 表达是一个负预后因素,提示在这种情况下可能需要免疫治疗。