• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政策措施对美国人口流动、新冠病例和死亡率的影响:时空透视。

The Impact of Policy Measures on Human Mobility, COVID-19 Cases, and Mortality in the US: A Spatiotemporal Perspective.

机构信息

Department of Geography and GeoInformation Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.

NSF Spatiotemporal Innovation Center, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 23;18(3):996. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030996.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18030996
PMID:33498647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7908236/
Abstract

Social distancing policies have been regarded as effective in containing the rapid spread of COVID-19. However, there is a limited understanding of policy effectiveness from a spatiotemporal perspective. This study integrates geographical, demographical, and other key factors into a regression-based event study framework, to assess the effectiveness of seven major policies on human mobility and COVID-19 case growth rates, with a spatiotemporal emphasis. Our results demonstrate that stay-at-home orders, workplace closures, and public information campaigns were effective in decreasing the confirmed case growth rate. For stay-at-home orders and workplace closures, these changes were associated with significant decreases ( < 0.05) in mobility. Public information campaigns did not see these same mobility trends, but the growth rate still decreased significantly in all analysis periods ( < 0.01). Stay-at-home orders and international/national travel controls had limited mitigation effects on the death case growth rate ( < 0.1). The relationships between policies, mobility, and epidemiological metrics allowed us to evaluate the effectiveness of each policy and gave us insight into the spatiotemporal patterns and mechanisms by which these measures work. Our analysis will provide policymakers with better knowledge regarding the effectiveness of measures in space-time disaggregation.

摘要

社交距离政策被认为是有效控制 COVID-19 快速传播的手段。然而,从时空角度来看,人们对政策效果的理解有限。本研究将地理、人口统计和其他关键因素纳入基于回归的事件研究框架,从时空角度评估了七种主要政策对人类流动性和 COVID-19 病例增长率的影响。研究结果表明,居家令、工作场所关闭和公共信息宣传活动在降低确诊病例增长率方面是有效的。对于居家令和工作场所关闭,这些变化与流动性的显著下降(<0.05)有关。公共信息宣传活动没有看到这些相同的流动性趋势,但在所有分析期内增长率仍显著下降(<0.01)。居家令和国际/国内旅行管制对死亡病例增长率的缓解作用有限(<0.1)。政策、流动性和流行病学指标之间的关系使我们能够评估每项政策的有效性,并深入了解这些措施在时空上的作用模式和机制。我们的分析将为政策制定者提供更好的关于措施在时空细分方面的有效性的知识。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Policy Measures on Human Mobility, COVID-19 Cases, and Mortality in the US: A Spatiotemporal Perspective.政策措施对美国人口流动、新冠病例和死亡率的影响:时空透视。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 23;18(3):996. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030996.
2
The Immediate Effect of COVID-19 Policies on Social-Distancing Behavior in the United States.《新冠疫情政策对美国社交隔离行为的即时影响》
Public Health Rep. 2021 Mar-Apr;136(2):245-252. doi: 10.1177/0033354920976575. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
3
Early social distancing policies in Europe, changes in mobility & COVID-19 case trajectories: Insights from Spring 2020.欧洲早期的社交隔离政策、流动性变化与 COVID-19 病例轨迹:来自 2020 年春季的洞察。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 30;16(6):e0253071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253071. eCollection 2021.
4
Strong Social Distancing Measures In The United States Reduced The COVID-19 Growth Rate.美国采取了强有力的社交隔离措施,降低了 COVID-19 的增长率。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jul;39(7):1237-1246. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00608. Epub 2020 May 14.
5
Exploring the impacts of travel-implied policy factors on COVID-19 spread within communities based on multi-source data interpretations.基于多源数据解读,探究旅行相关政策因素对社区内 COVID-19 传播的影响。
Health Place. 2021 May;69:102538. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102538. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
6
Asynchrony Between Individual and Government Actions Accounts for Disproportionate Impact of COVID-19 on Vulnerable Communities.个体和政府行动之间的不同步导致了 COVID-19 对弱势群体社区的不成比例影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Mar;60(3):318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.10.012. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
7
Timing of Community Mitigation and Changes in Reported COVID-19 and Community Mobility - Four U.S. Metropolitan Areas, February 26-April 1, 2020.社区缓解措施的时机与报告的 COVID-19 和社区流动性的变化 - 2020 年 2 月 26 日至 4 月 1 日,美国四个大都市区。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 17;69(15):451-457. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e2.
8
Predictors of State-Level Stay-at-Home Orders in the United States and Their Association With Mobility of Residents.美国各州居家令出台的预测因素及其与居民流动性的关系。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020 Nov/Dec;26(6):622-631. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001236.
9
Mitigation policies, community mobility, and COVID-19 case counts in Australia, Japan, Hong Kong, and Singapore.缓解政策、社区流动性与澳大利亚、日本、中国香港和新加坡的 COVID-19 病例数。
Public Health. 2021 May;194:238-244. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
10
Association of Jail Decarceration and Anticontagion Policies With COVID-19 Case Growth Rates in US Counties.美国各县监狱人口减少及防疫政策与新冠病毒病例增长率的关联
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2123405. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.23405.

引用本文的文献

1
Preparing for the next pandemic: Reflections and recommendations from Florida.为下一次大流行做准备:来自佛罗里达的思考与建议。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0314570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314570. eCollection 2024.
2
Effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19 in USA.美国非药物干预措施对 COVID-19 的有效性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 13;14(1):21387. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71984-1.
3
Risk Index of Regional Infection Expansion of COVID-19: Moving Direction Entropy Study Using Mobility Data and Its Application to Tokyo.

本文引用的文献

1
Stay-at-home orders associate with subsequent decreases in COVID-19 cases and fatalities in the United States.居家令与美国随后 COVID-19 病例和死亡人数的下降有关。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0248849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248849. eCollection 2021.
2
State-level tracking of COVID-19 in the United States.美国的 COVID-19 州级追踪
Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 3;11(1):6189. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19652-6.
3
Individual factors influencing risk perceptions of hazardous chemicals in China.个体因素对中国危险化学品风险感知的影响。
COVID-19 区域感染扩张风险指数:使用移动性数据的移动方向熵研究及其在东京的应用。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Aug 21;10:e57742. doi: 10.2196/57742.
4
Impacts of COVID-19-Related Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on Mobility and Accidents in Bangladesh.与新冠疫情相关的非药物干预措施对孟加拉国人员流动和事故的影响
Transp Res Rec. 2023 Apr;2677(4):917-933. doi: 10.1177/03611981221118532. Epub 2022 Sep 4.
5
Systematic review of empiric studies on lockdowns, workplace closures, and other non-pharmaceutical interventions in non-healthcare workplaces during the initial year of the COVID-19 pandemic: benefits and selected unintended consequences.COVID-19 大流行初始阶段非医疗工作场所实施封锁、关闭工作场所和其他非药物干预措施的经验性研究的系统评价:效益和一些意外的后果。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):884. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18377-1.
6
Assessing the Impact of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on Consumer Mobility Patterns and COVID-19 Transmission in the US.评估非药物干预措施对美国消费者流动性模式和 COVID-19 传播的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jan 7;21(1):67. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010067.
7
Effectiveness of social distancing measures and lockdowns for reducing transmission of COVID-19 in non-healthcare, community-based settings.社交距离措施和封锁措施在减少非医疗、社区环境中的 COVID-19 传播方面的效果。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 Oct 9;381(2257):20230132. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0132. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
8
Immunomodulatory Effects of Vitamin D in Respiratory Tract Infections and COVID-19 in Children.维生素 D 对儿童呼吸道感染和 COVID-19 的免疫调节作用。
Nutrients. 2023 Aug 2;15(15):3430. doi: 10.3390/nu15153430.
9
The impact of containment policy and mobility on COVID-19 cases through structural equation model in Chile, Singapore, South Korea and Israel.结构方程模型分析智利、新加坡、韩国和以色列的遏制政策和流动性对 COVID-19 病例的影响。
PeerJ. 2023 Aug 1;11:e15769. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15769. eCollection 2023.
10
Human mobility and infection from Covid-19 in the Osaka metropolitan area.大阪都会区的人员流动与新冠病毒感染情况
NPJ Urban Sustain. 2022;2(1):20. doi: 10.1038/s42949-022-00066-w. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
Environ Res. 2020 Jul;186:109523. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109523. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
4
Association of a Public Health Campaign About Coronavirus Disease 2019 Promoted by News Media and a Social Influencer With Self-reported Personal Hygiene and Physical Distancing in the Netherlands.新闻媒体和社交媒体影响者联合开展的关于 2019 冠状病毒病的公共卫生宣传活动与荷兰人自我报告的个人卫生和保持身体距离行为之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2014323. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14323.
5
Association between mobility patterns and COVID-19 transmission in the USA: a mathematical modelling study.美国移动模式与 COVID-19 传播的关联:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;20(11):1247-1254. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30553-3. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
6
Evaluation on different non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of 139 countries.新冠疫情期间不同非药物干预措施的评估:对139个国家的分析
J Infect. 2020 Sep;81(3):e70-e71. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.044. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
7
Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe.估算非药物干预措施对欧洲 COVID-19 疫情的影响。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):257-261. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
8
Strong Social Distancing Measures In The United States Reduced The COVID-19 Growth Rate.美国采取了强有力的社交隔离措施,降低了 COVID-19 的增长率。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jul;39(7):1237-1246. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00608. Epub 2020 May 14.
9
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Social Distancing Interventions to Delay or Flatten the Epidemic Curve of Coronavirus Disease.评估社交隔离干预措施在延迟或拉平冠状病毒病流行曲线方面的效果。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;26(8):1740-1748. doi: 10.3201/eid2608.201093. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
10
Impact of international travel and border control measures on the global spread of the novel 2019 coronavirus outbreak.国际旅行和边境管控措施对 2019 年新型冠状病毒全球传播的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 31;117(13):7504-7509. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2002616117. Epub 2020 Mar 13.