Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Aug;36(8):2292-2299. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06487-6. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
Leaders play a crucial role in implementing and sustaining changes in clinical practice, yet there is limited evidence on the strategies to engage them in team problem solving and communication.
Examine the impact of an intervention focused on facilitating leadership during daily huddles on optimizing team-based care and improving outcomes.
Cluster-randomized trial using intention-to-treat analysis to measure the effects of the intervention (n = 13 teams) compared with routine practice (n = 16 teams).
Twenty-nine primary care clinics affiliated with a large integrated health system in the upper Midwest; representing differing practice types and geographic settings.
Full-day leadership training retreat for team leaders to facilitate of care team huddles. Biweekly coaching calls and two site visits with an assigned coach.
Primary outcomes of team development and function were collected, pre- and post-intervention using surveys. Patient satisfaction and quality outcomes were compared pre- and post-intervention as secondary outcomes. Leadership engagement and adherence to the intervention were also assessed.
A total of 279 pre-intervention and 272 post-intervention surveys were completed. We found no impact on team development (- 0.98, 95% CI (- 3.18, 1.22)), improved team credibility (0.18, 95% CI (0.00, 0.35)), but worse psychological safety (- 0.19, 95% CI (- 0.38, 0.00)). No differences were observed in patient satisfaction; however, results were mixed among quality outcomes. Post hoc analysis within the intervention group showed higher adherence to the intervention was associated with improvement in team coordination (0.47, 95% CI (0.18, 0.76)), credibility (0.28, 95% CI (0.02, 0.53)), team learning (0.42, 95% CI (0.10, 0.74)), and knowledge creation (0.74, 95% CI (0.35, 1.13)) compared to teams that were less engaged.
Results of this evaluation showed that leadership training and facilitation were not associated with better team functioning. Additional components to the intervention tested may be necessary to enhance team functioning.
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT03062670. Registration Date: February 23, 2017. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03062670.
领导者在实施和维持临床实践变革方面发挥着关键作用,但关于如何吸引他们参与团队解决问题和沟通的策略的证据有限。
研究一项干预措施,该措施侧重于在日常交接班会议期间促进领导力,以优化基于团队的护理并改善结果。
采用意向治疗分析的集群随机试验,以衡量干预措施的效果(n = 13 个团队)与常规实践(n = 16 个团队)相比。
29 个隶属于上中西部地区大型综合卫生系统的初级保健诊所;代表不同的实践类型和地理位置。
针对团队负责人的全天领导力培训务虚会,以促进医护团队交接班会议。每两周进行一次辅导电话会议,并由指定教练进行两次现场访问。
使用调查在干预前和干预后分别收集团队发展和功能的主要结果。将患者满意度和质量结果作为次要结果,在干预前后进行比较。还评估了领导力参与度和对干预措施的依从性。
共完成了 279 份干预前和 272 份干预后调查。我们发现团队发展没有受到影响(-0.98,95%CI(-3.18,1.22)),团队可信度有所提高(0.18,95%CI(0.00,0.35)),但心理安全性下降(-0.19,95%CI(-0.38,0.00))。患者满意度没有差异;然而,质量结果参差不齐。干预组的事后分析表明,更高的干预措施依从性与团队协调(0.47,95%CI(0.18,0.76))、可信度(0.28,95%CI(0.02,0.53))、团队学习(0.42,95%CI(0.10,0.74))和知识创造(0.74,95%CI(0.35,1.13))的改善相关,而参与度较低的团队则没有。
这项评估的结果表明,领导力培训和促进与更好的团队运作无关。可能需要对测试的干预措施进行其他补充,以增强团队运作。
Clinicaltrials.gov 标识符 NCT03062670。注册日期:2017 年 2 月 23 日。网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03062670。