Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet.
Department of Gastroenterology, Dermatology and Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Oct 2;60(10):4703-4716. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab080.
The objectives of this study were to investigate the discriminative ability of EQ-5D-3L full health state (FHS) in clinical trials of SLE, and to identify factors associated with FHS after treatment.
Data from the BLISS-52 (NCT00424476) and BLISS-76 (NCT00410384) trials of belimumab (N = 1684) were utilized. FHS was defined as a response of no problems in all five EQ-5D-3L dimensions, yielding an index score of 1. The Pearson's χ2 or Fisher's exact test was employed for comparisons, and logistic regression for adjustments and assessment of independence.
We demonstrated higher EQ-5D-3L FHS frequencies among patients given standard therapy (ST) plus the licensed belimumab dose vs ST alone (26.1% vs 19.4%; P = 0.001; week 52), and within SRI-4 responders vs non-responders (27.0% vs 19.8%; P < 0.001; week 52) from weeks 36 to 52. In multivariable regression analysis, SLEDAI-2K (OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.87, 0.94; P < 0.001) and SLICC/ACR Damage Index (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.91; P = 0.001) scores were independently associated with lower FHS frequencies at week 52, while adding monthly infusions of belimumab 10 mg/kg to ST favoured FHS perception (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.15, 2.24; P = 0.006). Add-on belimumab 10 mg/kg yielded higher FHS frequencies in antimalarial users vs non-users (29.9% vs 20.1%; P = 0.011), and in anti-dsDNA- and anti-Sm- positive vs negative patients (31.4% vs 13.4%; P < 0.001 and 33.0% vs 22.6%; P = 0.010, respectively), whereas no significant differences were observed in patients given ST alone.
EQ-5D-3L FHS distinguished belimumab from placebo and responders from non-responders, and exhibited known-group validity in subgroup analysis. FHS may prove a useful patient-reported outcome in SLE studies.
本研究旨在探讨 EQ-5D-3L 全健康状态(FHS)在系统性红斑狼疮临床试验中的判别能力,并确定治疗后与 FHS 相关的因素。
利用贝利尤单抗 BLISS-52(NCT00424476)和 BLISS-76(NCT00410384)试验的数据(N=1684)。FHS 定义为所有五个 EQ-5D-3L 维度均无问题的反应,产生指数评分为 1。采用 Pearson's χ2 或 Fisher's 确切检验进行比较,采用逻辑回归进行调整和评估独立性。
与标准治疗(ST)加许可剂量贝利尤单抗相比,ST 加贝鲁单抗治疗患者的 EQ-5D-3L FHS 频率更高(26.1%比 19.4%;P=0.001;第 52 周),SRI-4 应答者与非应答者之间也存在差异(27.0%比 19.8%;P<0.001;第 52 周),从第 36 周到第 52 周。多变量回归分析显示,SLEDAI-2K(OR:0.90;95%CI:0.87,0.94;P<0.001)和 SLICC/ACR 损伤指数(OR:0.79;95%CI:0.69,0.91;P=0.001)评分与第 52 周 FHS 频率较低独立相关,而每月给予 10mg/kg 贝利尤单抗联合 ST 治疗有利于 FHS 感知(OR:1.60;95%CI:1.15,2.24;P=0.006)。每月给予 10mg/kg 贝利尤单抗可提高抗疟药使用者与非使用者的 FHS 频率(29.9%比 20.1%;P=0.011),以及抗 dsDNA-和抗 Sm-阳性与阴性患者的 FHS 频率(31.4%比 13.4%;P<0.001 和 33.0%比 22.6%;P=0.010),而单独给予 ST 治疗的患者则无显著差异。
EQ-5D-3L FHS 区分了贝利尤单抗和安慰剂以及应答者和非应答者,并且在亚组分析中表现出了已知组别的有效性。FHS 可能成为 SLE 研究中有用的患者报告结局。