Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
The Swedish Rheumatism Association, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Dec 1;62(12):3916-3923. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead140.
To investigate the ability of different EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) index scores to discriminate between verum drug and placebo (discriminant validity) as well as between responders and non-responders (known-groups validity) in the SLE patient population of two phase III clinical trials of belimumab.
Data from the BLISS-52 (NCT00424476) and BLISS-76 (NCT00410384) trials (N = 1684), which both showed superiority of belimumab to placebo, were utilized. Responders were defined as SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) achievers at week 52. The Pearson's χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for comparisons, and logistic regression analysis was used for adjustments for confounders and assessment of independence.
While full health state (FHS; EQ-5D index score 1) showed the best ability to discriminate between belimumab and placebo [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.47; 95% CI 1.11, 1.96; P = 0.008] and between SRI-4 responders and non-responders (adjusted OR 3.47; 95% CI 1.29, 10.98; P = 0.020), the discriminative ability of EQ-5D index scores 0.800 or more reached statistical significance for both discriminant validity (adjusted OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.02, 1.63; P = 0.036) and known-groups validity (adjusted OR 3.08; 95% CI 1.16, 9.69; P = 0.034).
Overall, higher EQ-5D index scores were associated with increasing ability to discriminate between belimumab and placebo, and between responders and non-responders. EQ-5D index scores less stringent than FHS may be clinically relevant health-related quality of life goals of treatment in patients with SLE, introducing the concept of EQ-5D adequate health state when FHS is not achievable.
评估不同欧洲五维健康量表 3 级(EQ-5D-3L)指数评分在两项贝利尤单抗 III 期临床试验 SLE 患者人群中的辨别能力(区分效度),即真药与安慰剂之间(区分效度),以及应答者与无应答者之间(已知组效度)。
利用 BLISS-52(NCT00424476)和 BLISS-76(NCT00410384)试验的数据(N=1684),这两项试验均显示贝利尤单抗优于安慰剂。应答者定义为在第 52 周时达到 SLE 应答指数 4(SRI-4)的患者。采用 Pearson's χ2 检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行比较,采用逻辑回归分析进行混杂因素调整,并评估独立性。
虽然完全健康状态(FHS;EQ-5D 指数评分 1)在区分贝利尤单抗和安慰剂方面表现最佳[校正比值比(OR)1.47;95%置信区间(CI)1.11,1.96;P=0.008],且在区分 SRI-4 应答者和无应答者方面表现最佳(校正 OR 3.47;95% CI 1.29,10.98;P=0.020),但 EQ-5D 指数评分等于或大于 0.800 对区分效度(校正 OR 1.29;95% CI 1.02,1.63;P=0.036)和已知组效度(校正 OR 3.08;95% CI 1.16,9.69;P=0.034)也具有统计学意义。
总体而言,EQ-5D 指数评分越高,区分贝利尤单抗和安慰剂以及区分应答者和无应答者的能力越强。与 FHS 相比,EQ-5D 指数评分不那么严格可能是 SLE 患者治疗的更具临床意义的健康相关生活质量目标,当无法实现 FHS 时引入 EQ-5D 充分健康状态的概念。