NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust.
Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Dec 1;60(12):5795-5800. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab070.
To describe the baseline characteristics, biologic DMARD (bDMARD) response and drug survival of axial SpA (axSpA) patients in the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Ankylosing Spondylitis (BSRBR-AS) according to radiographic status.
The BSRBR-AS is a national prospective cohort including axSpA participants classified according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria. In this analysis, baseline data of patients starting bDMARDs were compared. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Scores (ASDASs) for low disease status, clinically important improvement (CII) and major improvement (MI) at 1 year were used to assess treatment response. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed after adjusting for clinically relevant confounders.
A total of 1145 axSpA patients were included. Higher male prevalence, older age and longer disease duration were seen in the radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) subgroup. Based on a complete case analysis (290 patients), two-thirds of patients achieved an ASDAS low disease state at 1 year regardless of radiographic status [non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) 64.2% vs r-axSpA 66.1]. No statistically significant differences were seen between the subgroups in attaining ASDAS CII (nr-axSpA 50.7% vs r-axSpA 44.7%) or MI (nr-axSpA 20% vs r-axSpA 18.7%). Drug survival probability curves were similar for both subgroups and the hazard ratio for nr-axSpA/axSpA was 0.94 (95% CI 0.69, 1.28) when adjusted for sex, age, baseline ASDAS with CRP, smoking status, disease duration, HLA-B27 and prescribed biologic.
Although there appeared to be some differences in the baseline characteristics when exploring this cohort according to radiographic status, which are likely related to the natural history of the disease, the level of biologic response and drug survival was comparable between nr-axSpA and r-axSpA.
根据影像学结果,描述英国风湿病学会生物制剂注册处(BSRBR-AS)中强直性脊柱炎(axSpA)患者的基线特征、生物改善型抗风湿药物(bDMARD)应答和药物生存情况。
BSRBR-AS 是一项全国性前瞻性队列研究,纳入了根据评估脊柱关节炎国际协会标准分类的 axSpA 参与者。本分析比较了开始使用 bDMARDs 的患者的基线数据。采用强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分(ASDAS)评估低疾病状态、临床重要改善(CII)和主要改善(MI)在 1 年时的治疗应答。在调整了临床相关混杂因素后,进行了 Cox 比例风险分析。
共纳入 1145 例 axSpA 患者。影像学 axSpA(r-axSpA)亚组中,男性患病率较高,年龄较大,病程较长。基于完整病例分析(290 例),无论影像学状态如何,约三分之二的患者在 1 年内达到 ASDAS 低疾病状态[非影像学 axSpA(nr-axSpA)为 64.2%,r-axSpA 为 66.1%]。在达到 ASDAS CII(nr-axSpA 为 50.7%,r-axSpA 为 44.7%)或 MI(nr-axSpA 为 20%,r-axSpA 为 18.7%)方面,两个亚组之间无统计学显著差异。药物生存概率曲线在两个亚组中相似,当调整性别、年龄、基线时的 ASDAS 与 CRP、吸烟状态、疾病持续时间、HLA-B27 和所开的生物制剂后,nr-axSpA/axSpA 的风险比为 0.94(95%CI 0.69,1.28)。
虽然根据影像学状态探索该队列时,基线特征似乎存在一些差异,这可能与疾病的自然史有关,但在 nr-axSpA 和 r-axSpA 之间,生物应答和药物生存情况是可比的。