Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Manisa Celal Bayar University School of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara City Hospital, Universiteler Mah. 1604. Cad. Cankaya, Ankara, Turkey.
Rheumatol Int. 2020 Nov;40(11):1793-1801. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04680-8. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI) is used as a new instrument in measuring the function, disability and health of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). However, the real-world evidence of ASAS HI is very limited. In the present study, our objective is to evaluate the psychometric properties and performance of ASAS HI in the real-world setting as well as comparing ASAS HI with the current instruments to assess the construct validity and determine the cut-off points in patients with both ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA). A total of 991 patients with axSpA who fulfilled either the ASAS classification criteria for axial SpA (axSpA) or the Modified New York Criteria (mNY) for AS were recruited from the Biologic and targeted Synthetic antirheumatic drugs Registry (BioStaR) SpA. The construct validity of ASAS HI against the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activities Index (BASDAI) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional index (BASFI) was performed. Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis, the cut-off points were calculated. Of all the recruited patients, 851 (85.9%) were AS and 140 (14.1%) were nr-axSpA. The difference in the mean ASAS HI scores of the patients with AS and the ones with nr-axSpA were not statistically significant (6.12 ± 4.29 and 6.42 ± 4.86, respectively). The mean ASAS HI score was significantly higher in females and small city residents. The ASAS HI had a strong construct validity against ASDAS-CRP, BASDAI and BASFI. A cut-off point of ≤ 4 was determined to discriminate good and moderate, as well as ≥ 12 to discriminate moderate and poor health status. In conclusion, ASAS HI is a reliable instrument to evaluate health and functioning for both patients with AS and nr-axSpA in clinical practice.
ASAS 健康指数(ASAS HI)被用作一种新的工具,用于衡量强直性脊柱炎(SpA)患者的功能、残疾和健康状况。然而,ASAS HI 的真实世界证据非常有限。在本研究中,我们的目的是评估 ASAS HI 在真实环境中的心理测量特性和性能,以及将其与当前工具进行比较,以评估结构效度,并确定符合 ASAS 分类标准的轴性 SpA(axSpA)或改良纽约标准(mNY)的 AS 患者的中值点。共纳入 991 例 axSpA 患者,均来自生物制剂和靶向合成改善病情抗风湿药注册研究(BioStaR)SpA,这些患者符合 axSpA 的 ASAS 分类标准或 AS 的改良纽约标准。评估了 ASAS HI 与 Bath 强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI)和强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分- C 反应蛋白(ASDAS-CRP)、Bath 强直性脊柱炎功能指数(BASFI)之间的结构效度。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析计算切点。所有入组患者中,851 例(85.9%)为 AS,140 例(14.1%)为 nr-axSpA。AS 患者和 nr-axSpA 患者的 ASAS HI 评分均值差异无统计学意义(分别为 6.12±4.29 和 6.42±4.86)。女性和小城市居民的 ASAS HI 评分均值较高。ASAS HI 与 ASDAS-CRP、BASDAI 和 BASFI 具有较强的结构效度。确定了一个切点值≤4 来区分良好和中度,以及≥12 来区分中度和较差的健康状况。总之,ASAS HI 是一种可靠的工具,可用于评估临床实践中 AS 和 nr-axSpA 患者的健康和功能。