Suppr超能文献

研究型组织和研究资助组织内促进研究诚信的实践:范围综述。

Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split, Split, Croatia.

Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Jan 27;27(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1.

Abstract

Research integrity (RI) is a continuously developing concept, and increasing emphasis is put on creating RI promotion practices. This study aimed to map the existing RI guidance documents at research performing organisations (RPOs) and research funding organisations (RFOs). A search of bibliographic databases and grey literature sources was performed, and retrieved documents were screened for eligibility. The search of bibliographical databases and reference lists of selected articles identified a total of 92 documents while the search of grey literature sources identified 118 documents for analysis. The retrieved documents were analysed based on their geographical origin, research field and organisational origin (RPO or RFO) of RI practices, types of guidance presented in them, and target groups to which RI practices are directed. Most of the identified practices were developed for research in general, and are applicable to all research fields (n = 117) and medical sciences (n = 78). They were mostly written in the form of guidelines (n = 136) and targeted researchers (n = 167). A comprehensive search of the existing RI promotion practices showed that initiatives mostly come from RPOs while only a few RI practices originate from RFOs. This study showed that more RI guidance documents are needed for natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities since only a small number of documents was developed specifically for these research fields. The explored documents and the gaps in knowledge identified in this study can be used for further development of RI promotion practices in RPOs and RFOs.

摘要

研究诚信 (RI) 是一个不断发展的概念,越来越重视创建 RI 推广实践。本研究旨在绘制研究执行组织 (RPO) 和研究资助组织 (RFO) 现有的 RI 指导文件。对书目数据库和灰色文献来源进行了搜索,并对检索到的文件进行了筛选以确定其是否符合条件。对书目数据库和选定文章的参考文献的搜索共确定了 92 份文件,而对灰色文献来源的搜索则确定了 118 份供分析的文件。根据文件的地理来源、研究领域和 RI 实践的组织来源(RPO 或 RFO)、文件中呈现的指导类型以及 RI 实践针对的目标群体对检索到的文件进行了分析。确定的实践大多是针对一般研究制定的,适用于所有研究领域(n=117)和医学科学(n=78)。它们主要以指南的形式编写(n=136),并针对研究人员(n=167)。对现有 RI 推广实践的全面搜索表明,倡议主要来自 RPO,而只有少数 RI 实践来自 RFO。本研究表明,自然科学、社会科学和人文学科需要更多的 RI 指导文件,因为仅为这些研究领域专门制定了少数文件。本研究中探索的文件和确定的知识差距可用于进一步制定 RPO 和 RFO 的 RI 推广实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f633/7840650/483d2321ef70/11948_2021_281_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验