Fostering Research Integrity.
作者信息
Resnik David B, Shamoo Adil E
机构信息
a National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health , Research Triangle Park , North Carolina , USA.
b Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology , University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore , Maryland , USA.
出版信息
Account Res. 2017;24(6):367-372. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1334556. Epub 2017 May 26.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Fostering Research Integrity.培养研究诚信。
Account Res. 2017;24(6):367-372. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1334556. Epub 2017 May 26.
2
More than mentoring: the importance of group culture for scientific integrity: social management of a research group might help prevent cheating taking hold early in the career.不止于指导：团队文化对科研诚信的重要性：研究团队的社会管理可能有助于在职业生涯早期防止作弊行为的滋生。
Bioessays. 2009 Dec;31(12):1271-2. doi: 10.1002/bies.200900156.
3
What your research-integrity officer would like you to know.你的科研诚信管理人员希望你了解的内容。
Nature. 2019 May;569(7754):40. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01369-2.
4
Enhancing research integrity.加强研究诚信。
CMAJ. 2007 Aug 14;177(4):375. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1070059.
5
Scientific fraud: Europe must address research misconduct.科学欺诈：欧洲必须应对研究不当行为。
Nature. 2011 Dec 7;480(7376):181. doi: 10.1038/480181c.
6
Improving research misconduct policies: Evidence from social psychology could inform better policies to prevent misconduct in research.改进科研不端行为政策：社会心理学的证据可以为制定更好的政策提供信息，以防止研究中的不端行为。
EMBO Rep. 2017 Apr;18(4):511-514. doi: 10.15252/embr.201744110. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
7
Cooperate to stop misconduct.合作制止不当行为。
Nature. 2018 May;557(7707):637. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05290-y.
8
China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct.中国推行全面改革以打击学术不端行为。
Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7709):171. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05359-8.
9
Scientific misconduct: ORI survey is flawed.科研不端行为：美国国立卫生研究院科研诚信办公室的调查存在缺陷。
Nature. 2002;420(6917):739-40. doi: 10.1038/420739c.
10
Ethics of scientific publication after the human stem cell scandal.人类干细胞丑闻后的科学出版伦理
Arch Med Res. 2006 May;37(4):423-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2006.02.001.
引用本文的文献
1
Status of scientific research integrity knowledge in dental undergraduates from 34 universities in China.中国34所大学牙科本科生的科研诚信知识状况。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Feb 22;26(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01183-8.
2
Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review.研究型组织和研究资助组织内促进研究诚信的实践：范围综述。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Jan 27;27(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1.
本文引用的文献
1
Effective Practices in the Delivery of Research Ethics Education: A Qualitative Review of Instructional Methods.研究伦理教育实施中的有效实践：教学方法的定性综述
Account Res. 2017;24(5):297-321. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1301210. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
2
How Do We Know What Works? A Review and Critique of Current Practices in Ethics Training Evaluation.我们如何知道什么有效？对伦理培训评估当前实践的回顾与批判。
Account Res. 2016;23(6):319-50. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2016.1186547.
3
A note from the editor.编辑的一则说明。
Account Res. 1989 Sep;1(1):1-2. doi: 10.1080/08989628908573768.
4
Data audit as a way to prevent/contain misconduct.数据审核作为防止/遏制不当行为的一种方式。
Account Res. 2013;20(5-6):369-79. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.822259.
5
Research misconduct and its federal regulation: the origin and history of the Office of Research Integrity--with personal views by ORI's former associate director for investigative oversight.研究不端行为及其联邦法规：研究诚信办公室的起源和历史——前调查监督副主任的个人观点。
Account Res. 2013;20(5-6):291-319. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.822238.
6
Perspective: research misconduct: the search for a remedy.观点：研究不端行为：寻找补救措施。
Acad Med. 2012 Jul;87(7):877-82. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318257ee6a.
7
How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.有多少科学家伪造和篡改研究数据？对调查数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
8
Repairing research integrity.修复研究诚信。
Nature. 2008 Jun 19;453(7198):980-2. doi: 10.1038/453980a.
9
Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research.应对科研行为责任教育中的挑战。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):870-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f77fe.
10
Six domains of research ethics. A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research.研究伦理的六个领域。负责任研究行为的启发式框架。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2002 Apr;8(2):191-205. doi: 10.1007/s11948-002-0018-1.
Zotero 插件