• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节炎和风湿性疾病患者样本中健康照护赋权问卷的心理计量学特性。

Psychometric characteristics of the health care empowerment questionnaire in a sample of patients with arthritis and rheumatic conditions.

机构信息

Dartmouth College, Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA.

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Center for Program Design and Evaluation, Lebanon, NH, USA.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):537-547. doi: 10.1111/hex.13196. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13196
PMID:33503330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8077072/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient empowerment can improve health-related outcomes and is important in chronic conditions, such as arthritis. This study aimed to validate the Health Care Empowerment Questionnaire (HCEQ), a patient-reported experience measure of empowerment, for use with patients with arthritis and other rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

The HCEQ measures Patient Information Seeking (or Involvement in Decisions) and Healthcare Interaction Results (or Involvement in Interactions) and asks respondents to answer questions in two ways: whether they feel something happened and its importance to them. Face validity was assessed through qualitative data (n = 8, nominal group technique; n = 55, focus groups). Measure structure was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA); internal consistency was also assessed (n = 9226). Test-retest reliability was assessed with sub-sample of participants (n = 182).

RESULTS

We found adequate face validity of the HCEQ for patients with arthritis. The CFA indicated good fit to the data for the two-factor structure of the HCEQ (RMSEA = 0.075; CFI = 0.987; TLI = 0.978; SRMR = 0.026). Internal consistency was strong (α=0.94 for both subscales). Test-retest reliability was moderate for Patient Information Seeking (ICC=0.67) and good for Healthcare Interaction Results (ICC=0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

The HCEQ, with modifications, demonstrated promising psychometric properties within this sample, laying the foundation for further assessment. This work supports the HCEQ as an appropriate instrument for examining experiences with and perceived importance of empowerment in individuals with arthritis and other rheumatic conditions.

PATIENT CONTRIBUTION

Patients contributed to the assessment of face validity. As a measure of patient empowerment, the HCEQ's use can enable further participation of patients in health care.

摘要

背景

患者赋权可以改善与健康相关的结果,在关节炎等慢性疾病中尤为重要。本研究旨在验证健康照护赋权问卷(HCEQ),这是一种衡量赋权的患者报告体验测量工具,适用于关节炎和其他风湿性疾病患者。

方法

HCEQ 衡量患者信息寻求(或参与决策)和医疗保健互动结果(或参与互动),并要求受访者以两种方式回答问题:是否感到某事发生了以及其对他们的重要性。通过定性数据(n=8,名义群体技术;n=55,焦点小组)评估表面效度。通过验证性因素分析(CFA)评估测量结构;还评估了内部一致性(n=9226)。使用参与者的子样本(n=182)评估测试-重测信度。

结果

我们发现 HCEQ 对于关节炎患者具有足够的表面效度。CFA 表明,HCEQ 的两因素结构数据拟合良好(RMSEA=0.075;CFI=0.987;TLI=0.978;SRMR=0.026)。内部一致性很强(两个分量表的α值均为 0.94)。信息寻求的测试-重测信度为中等(ICC=0.67),互动结果的测试-重测信度为良好(ICC=0.77)。

结论

经过修改,HCEQ 在该样本中表现出有前途的心理测量特性,为进一步评估奠定了基础。这项工作支持 HCEQ 作为一种合适的工具,用于评估关节炎和其他风湿性疾病患者的赋权体验和感知重要性。

患者贡献

患者为表面效度评估做出了贡献。作为衡量患者赋权的工具,HCEQ 的使用可以使患者进一步参与医疗保健。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/036d/8077072/d8257631e429/HEX-24-537-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/036d/8077072/f5ddb49f6532/HEX-24-537-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/036d/8077072/d8257631e429/HEX-24-537-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/036d/8077072/f5ddb49f6532/HEX-24-537-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/036d/8077072/d8257631e429/HEX-24-537-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric characteristics of the health care empowerment questionnaire in a sample of patients with arthritis and rheumatic conditions.关节炎和风湿性疾病患者样本中健康照护赋权问卷的心理计量学特性。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):537-547. doi: 10.1111/hex.13196. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
Testing Psychometrics of Healthcare Empowerment Questionnaires (HCEQ) among Iranian Reproductive Age Women: Persian Version.伊朗育龄妇女健康赋权问卷(HCEQ)的心理测量学测试:波斯语版本
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018 May;28(3):341-346. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v28i3.12.
3
Development and validation of an instrument measuring individual empowerment in relation to personal health care: the Health Care Empowerment Questionnaire (HCEQ).一种测量个人在个人医疗保健方面赋权程度的工具的开发与验证:医疗保健赋权问卷(HCEQ)。
Am J Health Promot. 2006 Jul-Aug;20(6):429-35. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-20.6.429.
4
Psychometric properties of the Swedish Rheumatic Disease Empowerment Scale, SWE-RES-23.瑞典风湿性疾病赋权量表(SWE-RES-23)的心理测量学特性。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2012 Jun;10(2):101-9. doi: 10.1002/msc.1005. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
5
Psychometric properties evaluation of the Psychological Empowerment Instrument in a Brazilian context.心理授权量表在巴西背景下的心理测量学特性评估。
J Nurs Manag. 2019 Mar;27(2):404-413. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12701. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
6
Patient perspectives on continuity of care: adaption and preliminary psychometric assessment of a Norwegian version of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire (NCQ-N).患者对医疗连续性的看法:挪威版奈梅亨连续性问卷(NCQ-N)的改编及初步心理测量评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):760. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2706-1.
7
Collective Empowerment in Online Health Communities: Scale Development and Empirical Validation.在线健康社区中的集体赋权:量表开发与实证验证
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 20;21(11):e14392. doi: 10.2196/14392.
8
Validity and reliability of the ten-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC10) instrument in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in Singapore.新加坡轴向型脊柱关节炎(axSpA)患者的Connor-Davidson 韧性量表(CD-RISC10)十项量表的有效性和可靠性。
Rheumatol Int. 2019 Jan;39(1):105-110. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4217-8. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
9
How to measure experiences of healthcare quality in Denmark among patients with heart disease? The development and psychometric evaluation of a patient-reported instrument.如何衡量丹麦心脏病患者的医疗质量体验?一种患者报告工具的开发与心理测量评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 30;7(10):e016234. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016234.
10
Transcultural adaptation and validation of the patient empowerment in long-term conditions questionnaire.《长期病症患者赋权问卷的跨文化调适与验证》
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 4;17(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2271-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Stakeholder Development of an Online Program to Track Arthritis-Related Patient-Reported Outcomes Longitudinally: Live Yes! INSIGHTS.用于纵向跟踪关节炎相关患者报告结局的在线项目的利益相关者开发:实时参与!深入见解。
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020 Dec;2(12):750-759. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11203. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
2
Patient Preferences for Shared Decision Making: Not All Decisions Should Be Shared.患者对共同决策的偏好:并非所有决策都应共享。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 May 15;28(10):419-426. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00146.
3
A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.
患者报告体验测量的有效性和可靠性的系统评价。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):1023-1035. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13187. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
4
Testing Psychometrics of Healthcare Empowerment Questionnaires (HCEQ) among Iranian Reproductive Age Women: Persian Version.伊朗育龄妇女健康赋权问卷(HCEQ)的心理测量学测试:波斯语版本
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018 May;28(3):341-346. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v28i3.12.
5
A Longitudinal Study of Ambulatory Physician Encounters, Emergency Room Visits, and Hospitalizations by Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A 13-year Population Health Study.类风湿关节炎患者的门诊医师就诊、急诊就诊和住院的纵向研究:一项长达 13 年的人群健康研究。
J Rheumatol. 2017 Oct;44(10):1421-1428. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170056. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
6
Assessing the predictive power of psychological empowerment and health literacy for older patients' participation in health care: a cross-sectional population-based study.评估心理授权和健康素养对老年患者参与医疗保健的预测能力:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0448-x.
7
Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: A concept analysis based on a literature review.医院护理中的患者赋权、患者参与和以患者为中心:基于文献综述的概念分析
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):1923-1939. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.026. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
8
Patient focused registries can improve health, care, and science.以患者为中心的注册系统可以改善健康、医疗和科学。
BMJ. 2016 Jul 1;354:i3319. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3319.
9
Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Health Care To Engage Patients And Enhance Care.将患者报告的结果纳入医疗保健,以促使患者参与并改善护理。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):575-82. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1362.
10
Patient-centred care in established rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者的以患者为中心的护理。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Aug-Dec;29(4-5):643-63. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Oct 29.