Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (M.K., N.D., S.H.B., S.S.M., E.S., K.M.).
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (M.J.S., S.S.M., K.M.).
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2021 Mar;41(3):1229-1238. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.315828. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
The aim of this study was to comprehensively assess the association of multiple lipid measures with incident peripheral artery disease (PAD). Approach and Results: We used Cox proportional hazards models to characterize the associations of each of the fasting lipid measures (total cholesterol, LDL-C [low-density lipoprotein cholesterol], HDL-C [high-density lipoprotein cholesterol], triglycerides, RLP-C [remnant lipoprotein cholesterol], LDL-TG [LDL-triglycerides], sdLDL-C [small dense LDL-C], and Apo-E-HDL [Apo-E-containing HDL-C]) with incident PAD identified by pertinent () hospital discharge codes (eg, 440.2) among 8330 Black and White ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) participants (mean age 62.8 [SD 5.6] years) free of PAD at baseline (1996-1998) through 2015. Since lipid traits are biologically correlated to each other, we also conducted principal component analysis to identify underlying components for PAD risk. There were 246 incident PAD cases with a median follow-up of 17 years. After accounting for potential confounders, the following lipid measures were significantly associated with PAD (hazard ratio per 1-SD increment [decrement for HDL-C and Apo-E-HDL]): triglycerides, 1.21 (95% CI, 1.08-1.36); RLP-C, 1.18 (1.08-1.29); LDL-TG, 1.18 (1.05-1.33); HDL-C, 1.39 (1.16-1.67); and Apo-E-HDL, 1.27 (1.07-1.51). The principal component analysis identified 3 components (1: mainly loaded by triglycerides, RLP-C, LDL-TG, and sdLDL-C; 2: by HDL-C and Apo-E-HDL; and 3: by LDL-C and RLP-C). Components 1 and 2 showed independent associations with incident PAD.
Triglyceride-related and HDL-related lipids were independently associated with incident PAD, which has implications on preventive strategies for PAD. However, none of the novel lipid measures outperformed conventional ones. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.
本研究旨在全面评估多种血脂指标与外周动脉疾病(PAD)发病的相关性。
我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型来描述每种空腹血脂指标(总胆固醇、LDL-C[低密度脂蛋白胆固醇]、HDL-C[高密度脂蛋白胆固醇]、甘油三酯、RLP-C[残粒脂蛋白胆固醇]、LDL-TG[LDL-甘油三酯]、sdLDL-C[小而密 LDL-C]和 Apo-E-HDL[Apo-E 含载脂蛋白 HDL-C])与 8330 名非 PAD 的黑人和白人 ARIC(社区动脉粥样硬化风险)参与者(基线时平均年龄 62.8[SD 5.6]岁,无 PAD,1996-1998 年)通过 2015 年通过相关的()医院出院代码(例如,440.2)确定的 PAD 发病的相关性。由于血脂特征彼此之间具有生物学相关性,我们还进行了主成分分析,以确定与 PAD 风险相关的潜在成分。共有 246 例 PAD 发病病例,中位随访时间为 17 年。在考虑到潜在混杂因素后,以下血脂指标与 PAD 显著相关(每 1-SD 增量[HDL-C 和 Apo-E-HDL 减量]的风险比):甘油三酯,1.21(95%CI,1.08-1.36);RLP-C,1.18(1.08-1.29);LDL-TG,1.18(1.05-1.33);HDL-C,1.39(1.16-1.67);和 Apo-E-HDL,1.27(1.07-1.51)。主成分分析确定了 3 个成分(1:主要由甘油三酯、RLP-C、LDL-TG 和 sdLDL-C 组成;2:由 HDL-C 和 Apo-E-HDL 组成;和 3:由 LDL-C 和 RLP-C 组成)。成分 1 和 2 与 PAD 的发病独立相关。
甘油三酯相关和 HDL 相关的脂质与 PAD 的发病独立相关,这对外周动脉疾病的预防策略具有重要意义。然而,没有一种新型的血脂指标比传统的血脂指标表现更好。