Hussein Mohammad H, Elshazli Rami M, Attia Abdallah S, Nguyen Therese P, Aboueisha Mohamed, Munshi Ruhul, Toraih Eman A, Fawzy Manal S, Kandil Emad
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Horus University - Egypt, New Damietta, Egypt.
J Asthma. 2022 May;59(5):851-858. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1881970. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
There are varying reports of the prevalence and effect of comorbid asthma in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients. We sought to conduct a meta-analysis comparing asthmatic and non-asthmatic patients to determine the clinical significance of preexisting asthma in COVID-19 patients.
Online databases PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus, were searched up to July 15, 2020, for papers comparing asthma non-asthma COVID-19 patients.
According to prespecified inclusion criteria, this analysis included eleven retrospective studies with 107,983 COVID-19 patients. Subgroup analysis was performed based on age groups.
The mean age of the patients was 59.9 years (95%CI = 51.9-67.9). Across studies, the prevalence of asthma was 11.2% (95%CI: 9.1%-13.3%) among COVID-19 patients who attended the hospitals. Asthma patients were more likely to be younger (SMD = -0.36, 95%CI = -0.61 to -0.10, = 0.005), and obese (OR = 1.98, 95%CI = 1.54-2.55, < 0.001), there was no differential risk of hospitalization rate, ICU admission, or development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) between asthmatic and non-asthmatic cohorts. However, asthmatic patients had increased risk of endotracheal intubation (RR = 1.27, 95%CI = 1.02-1.58, = 0.030) especially patients aged <50 years (RR = 6.68, 95%CI = 1.76-11.13, = 0.009). Despite this result, asthmatic patients had better recovery with a higher liability of being discharged and were less likely to die (RR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.65-0.97, = 0.026).
To our knowledge, our meta-analysis is the largest to shed light on preexisting asthma as a predictor of intubation in COVID-19, especially in young and obese patients. Identifying high-risk groups is crucial for designing more effective intervention plans and optimization of efficient resource allocation.
关于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者中合并哮喘的患病率及影响,有不同的报道。我们试图进行一项荟萃分析,比较哮喘患者和非哮喘患者,以确定COVID-19患者中既往哮喘的临床意义。
截至2020年7月15日,在在线数据库PubMed、ScienceDirect、Web of Science和Scopus中检索比较哮喘与非哮喘COVID-19患者的论文。
根据预先设定的纳入标准,本分析纳入了11项回顾性研究,共107,983例COVID-19患者。基于年龄组进行亚组分析。
患者的平均年龄为59.9岁(95%置信区间=51.9-67.9)。在各项研究中,住院的COVID-19患者中哮喘的患病率为11.2%(95%置信区间:9.1%-13.3%)。哮喘患者更可能较年轻(标准化均值差=-0.36,95%置信区间=-0.61至-0.10,P=0.005),且肥胖(比值比=1.98,95%置信区间=1.54-2.55,P<0.001),哮喘组和非哮喘组在住院率、入住重症监护病房或发生急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)方面没有差异风险。然而,哮喘患者气管插管的风险增加(风险比=1.27,95%置信区间=1.02-1.58,P=0.030),尤其是年龄<50岁的患者(风险比=6.68,95%置信区间=1.76-11.13,P=0.009)。尽管有此结果,哮喘患者恢复较好,出院可能性更高,死亡可能性更低(风险比=0.80,95%置信区间=0.65-0.97,P=0.026)。
据我们所知,我们的荟萃分析是规模最大的,旨在阐明既往哮喘作为COVID-19患者插管预测因素的情况,尤其是在年轻和肥胖患者中。识别高危人群对于设计更有效的干预计划和优化高效资源分配至关重要。