Theocharidou Anna, Kontonasaki Eleana, Koukousaki Ioanna, Koumpouli Alexandra, Betsani Ioanna, Koidis Petros
Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Mar;127(3):479-488. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.015. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
How the translucency and color of ceramic restorations are affected by surface changes from the corrosive environment in the oral cavity and aging of materials is unclear.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the impact of acidic exposure and aging on the color and translucency of monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics.
Twenty computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) monolithic zirconia specimens and 20 pressed lithium disilicate specimens were fabricated. Half of the specimens of each group were aged in an autoclave (7.5 hours, 134 °C, 0.2 MPa), and the rest were immersed in hydrochloric acid to simulate the acidic conditions in the oral cavity from gastric reflux. The color coordinates L∗, a∗, and b∗ were measured with an ultraviolet spectrophotometer before and after aging or acidic storage. The translucency parameters and contrast ratios were calculated, and the CIEDE2000 color difference formula was used to determine color differences before and after each treatment. ANOVA and ANCOVA test models were used for data analysis (α=.05), while differences of color parameters in respect to acceptability and perceptibility thresholds were evaluated with the 1-sample t test (α=.05).
Lithium disilicate presented a significantly higher translucency parameter and lower contrast ratio at baseline compared with monolithic zirconia specimens (P<.001). Acidic storage significantly impacted all parameters compared with aging, especially for the lithium disilicate group. Color differences were above the acceptability ΔΕ threshold for lithium disilicate after acidic storage (P=.001) and below for monolithic zirconia after acidic storage (P=.003).
The performance of lithium disilicate was slightly inferior compared with that of monolithic zirconia specimens, as they presented significant and clinically observable differences for the translucency parameter and ΔΕ after acidic storage and aging.
口腔腐蚀性环境导致的表面变化以及材料老化如何影响陶瓷修复体的透明度和颜色尚不清楚。
本体外研究的目的是比较酸性暴露和老化对整体式氧化锆和二硅酸锂陶瓷颜色和透明度的影响。
制作了20个计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)整体式氧化锆试件以及20个压制二硅酸锂试件。每组试件的一半在高压灭菌器中老化(7.5小时,134°C,0.2MPa),其余的浸入盐酸中以模拟胃反流导致的口腔酸性环境。在老化或酸性储存前后,用紫外分光光度计测量颜色坐标L∗、a∗和b∗。计算透明度参数和对比度,并用CIEDE2000色差公式确定每次处理前后的颜色差异。采用方差分析和协方差分析测试模型进行数据分析(α = 0.05),同时用单样本t检验评估颜色参数相对于可接受性和可感知性阈值的差异(α = 0.05)。
与整体式氧化锆试件相比,二硅酸锂在基线时呈现出显著更高的透明度参数和更低的对比度(P < 0.001)。与老化相比,酸性储存对所有参数的影响都显著,尤其是二硅酸锂组。酸性储存后,二硅酸锂的颜色差异高于可接受的ΔΕ阈值(P = 0.001),而整体式氧化锆在酸性储存后的颜色差异低于该阈值(P = 0.003)。
与整体式氧化锆试件相比,二硅酸锂的性能略逊一筹,因为在酸性储存和老化后,它们在透明度参数和ΔΕ方面存在显著且临床上可观察到的差异。