Suppr超能文献

不同牙科整体陶瓷的半透明度和乳光性比较。

Comparison of translucency and opalescence among different dental monolithic ceramics.

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.

Professor of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Center, Dental Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Sep;126(3):446.e1-446.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.030. Epub 2021 Jul 23.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Monolithic ceramic restorations designed by computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing are increasingly being used by clinicians. With the introduction of new materials, their optical characteristics also need to be investigated.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the translucency and opalescence of lithium disilicate, zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate, presintered zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate, polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material, and multilayer zirconia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 50 rectangular plates (14×12×1 mm) of 5 monolithic ceramics were prepared in this in vitro study (n=10). Each zirconia specimen was divided into 3 groups of incisal, middle, and gingival thirds. Each group was then evaluated separately. The color parameters of specimens were measured on 3 backgrounds, white, black, and #3 Ivoclar Natural Die Color material, by using a spectrophotometer. The translucency and opalescence of the specimens were determined by the relevant equations, and between-group comparisons were made. One-way ANOVA and Tamhane post hoc tests were used to compare groups (α=.05).

RESULTS

The difference among the groups was significant in translucency (F=137.346, df=6, P<.001), contrast ratio (F=134.148, df=6, P<.001), and opalescence parameters (F=128.028, df=6, P<.001). The 3 zirconia groups (10.87 ±0.54 to 11.88 ±0.26) had a significantly lower translucency than the other groups, and the zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate group (18.14 ±0.74) showed the highest translucency. Zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (12.36 ±0.42) had the highest opalescence, and the lowest opalescence was found for polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network (5.43 ±0.28) and the incisal third of zirconia (5.45 ±1.06).

CONCLUSIONS

The zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate and presintered zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate specimens had the highest translucency and opalescence. The studied multilayer zirconia, which had different cubic phase values from incisal to gingival blank, showed similar translucency over the entire range, and differences among different regions were related to chromatic variables.

摘要

问题陈述

由计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造设计的整体陶瓷修复体越来越多地被临床医生使用。随着新材料的引入,还需要研究它们的光学特性。

目的

本体外研究的目的是比较锂硅二酸盐、氧化锆增强锂硅、预烧结氧化锆增强锂硅、聚合物渗透陶瓷网络材料和多层氧化锆的半透明度和乳光性。

材料和方法

本体外研究共制备了 50 个矩形陶瓷片(14×12×1mm)(n=10)。每个氧化锆样本分为切端、中部和龈端三部分。然后分别评估每个组。使用分光光度计在白色、黑色和#3 Ivoclar 天然模具颜色材料 3 种背景下测量标本的颜色参数。通过相关方程确定标本的半透明度和乳光性,并进行组间比较。采用单向方差分析和 Tamhane 事后检验比较组间差异(α=0.05)。

结果

各组间半透明度(F=137.346,df=6,P<.001)、对比率(F=134.148,df=6,P<.001)和乳光性参数(F=128.028,df=6,P<.001)差异有统计学意义。3 个氧化锆组(10.87±0.54 至 11.88±0.26)的半透明度明显低于其他组,氧化锆增强锂硅组(18.14±0.74)的半透明度最高。氧化锆增强锂硅(12.36±0.42)具有最高的乳光性,聚合物渗透陶瓷网络(5.43±0.28)和氧化锆的切端(5.45±1.06)的乳光性最低。

结论

氧化锆增强锂硅和预烧结氧化锆增强锂硅标本的半透明度和乳光性最高。研究的多层氧化锆从切端到龈端空白的四方相值不同,但在整个范围内表现出相似的半透明度,不同区域之间的差异与色度变量有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验