• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部治疗与根治性前列腺切除术治疗非转移性前列腺癌的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。

Focal therapy compared to radical prostatectomy for non-metastatic prostate cancer: a propensity score-matched study.

机构信息

Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Jun;24(2):567-574. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00315-y. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1038/s41391-020-00315-y
PMID:33504940
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Focal therapy (FT) ablates areas of prostate cancer rather than treating the whole gland. We compared oncological outcomes of FT to radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

Using prospective multicentre databases of 761 FT and 572 RP cases (November/2005-September/2018), patients with PSA < 20 ng/ml, Gleason </= 4 + 3 and stage </= T2c were 1-1 propensity score-matched for treatment year, age, PSA, Gleason, T-stage, cancer core length and use of neoadjuvant hormones. FT included 1-2 sessions. Primary outcome was failure-free survival (FFS) defined by need for salvage local or systemic therapy or metastases. Differences in FFS were determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test.

RESULTS

335 radical prostatectomy and 501 focal therapy patients were eligible for matching. For focal therapy, 420 had HIFU and 81 cryotherapy. Cryotherapy was used predominantly for anterior cancer. After matching, 246 RP and 246 FT cases were identified. For radical prostatectomy, mean (SD) age was 63.4 (5.6) years, median (IQR) PSA 7.9 g/ml (6-10) and median (IQR) follow-up 64 (30-89) months. For focal therapy, these were 63.3 (6.9) years, 7.9 ng/ml (5.5-10.6) and 49 [34-67] months, respectively. At 3, 5 and 8 years, FFS (95%CI) was 86% (81-91%), 82% (77-88%) and 79% (73-86%) for radical prostatectomy compared to 91% (87-95%), 86% (81-92%) and 83% (76-90%) following focal therapy (p = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with non-metastatic low- intermediate prostate cancer, oncological outcomes over 8 years were similar between focal therapy and radical prostatectomy.

摘要

简介

局部治疗(FT)消融前列腺癌的部位而不是治疗整个腺体。我们比较了 FT 和根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的肿瘤学结果。

方法

使用前瞻性多中心数据库的 761 例 FT 和 572 例 RP 病例(2005 年 11 月至 2018 年 9 月),PSA<20ng/ml、Gleason<4+3 和分期<2c 的患者,按治疗年份、年龄、PSA、Gleason、T 分期、癌症核心长度和新辅助激素使用进行 1:1 倾向评分匹配。FT 包括 1-2 次治疗。主要结局是无失败生存(FFS),定义为需要挽救性局部或全身治疗或转移。使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析和对数秩检验确定 FFS 差异。

结果

335 例根治性前列腺切除术和 501 例局部治疗患者符合匹配条件。对于局部治疗,420 例采用 HIFU 治疗,81 例采用冷冻治疗。冷冻治疗主要用于前癌。匹配后,确定了 246 例 RP 和 246 例 FT 病例。对于根治性前列腺切除术,平均(SD)年龄为 63.4(5.6)岁,中位(IQR)PSA 为 7.9ng/ml(6-10),中位(IQR)随访时间为 64(30-89)个月。对于局部治疗,这些分别为 63.3(6.9)岁、7.9ng/ml(5.5-10.6)和 49[34-67]个月。在 3、5 和 8 年时,FFS(95%CI)为根治性前列腺切除术 86%(81-91%)、82%(77-88%)和 79%(73-86%),局部治疗为 91%(87-95%)、86%(81-92%)和 83%(76-90%)(p=0.12)。

结论

在非转移性低中度前列腺癌患者中,8 年以上的肿瘤学结果在局部治疗和根治性前列腺切除术中相似。

相似文献

1
Focal therapy compared to radical prostatectomy for non-metastatic prostate cancer: a propensity score-matched study.局部治疗与根治性前列腺切除术治疗非转移性前列腺癌的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Jun;24(2):567-574. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00315-y. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
2
Conventional radical versus focal treatment for localised prostate cancer: a propensity score weighted comparison of 6-year tumour control.常规根治性治疗与局部前列腺癌的局部治疗:6 年肿瘤控制的倾向评分加权比较。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Dec;24(4):1120-1128. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00369-6. Epub 2021 May 1.
3
Focal cryotherapy for clinically unilateral, low-intermediate risk prostate cancer in 73 men with a median follow-up of 3.7 years.73 例临床单侧、中低危前列腺癌患者行局灶冷冻治疗,中位随访时间 3.7 年。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
4
Outcomes of treatment for localized prostate cancer in a single institution: comparison of radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy by propensity score matching analysis.单中心局限性前列腺癌治疗结局:基于倾向评分匹配分析的前列腺根治性切除术与放疗比较。
World J Urol. 2020 Oct;38(10):2477-2484. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03056-3. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
5
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.辅助治疗初治患者根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性对前列腺特异抗原失败的影响。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
6
Focal therapy versus radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy as primary treatment options for non-metastatic prostate cancer: results of a cost-effectiveness analysis.聚焦治疗与根治性前列腺切除术及外照射放疗作为非转移性前列腺癌的主要治疗选择:成本效益分析结果
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):1099-1107. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2251849.
7
Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术是治疗标本中存在高病理 Gleason 评分前列腺癌的有效方法。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):723-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11114.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
8
Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features.对于具有不良病理特征的前列腺癌患者,根治性前列腺切除术后辅助放疗可改善生化结局。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Mar 1;61(3):714-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.018.
9
Focal Laser Ablation Versus Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Survival Outcomes From a Matched Cohort.局灶性激光消融与根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌:匹配队列的生存结果。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Dec;17(6):464-469.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
10
Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Focal Therapy: Oncological, Functional Outcomes and Predictors of Recurrence.机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术在局灶治疗后的应用:肿瘤学、功能结果和复发的预测因素。
Eur Urol. 2019 Jul;76(1):27-30. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Oncological Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Focal and Whole-Gland Interventions in the Treatment of Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.微创聚焦及全腺体干预治疗低危和中危前列腺癌的肿瘤学疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 30;17(17):2863. doi: 10.3390/cancers17172863.
2
Evaluating less-invasive strategies for localized prostate cancer: a comparative meta-analysis on high-intensity focused ultrasound versus radical prostatectomy.评估局限性前列腺癌的微创治疗策略:高强度聚焦超声与根治性前列腺切除术的比较荟萃分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04695-9.
3
Prostate specific membrane antigen focal ablation imaging (PSMA-FAB).
前列腺特异性膜抗原聚焦消融成像(PSMA-FAB)
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Jul 30. doi: 10.1038/s41391-025-01005-3.
4
Treatment Intensification Prior to Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.临床局限性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术之前的治疗强化
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 7;17(13):2258. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132258.
5
Oncological effects and complications of salvage cryotherapy for radio-recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.挽救性冷冻治疗放射性复发前列腺癌的肿瘤学效应及并发症:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 3;15:1534739. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1534739. eCollection 2025.
6
Focal therapy in prostate cancer: Development, application and outcomes in the United Kingdom.前列腺癌的聚焦治疗:英国的发展、应用与成果
BJUI Compass. 2025 Feb 20;6(2):e70000. doi: 10.1002/bco2.70000. eCollection 2025 Feb.
7
Focal therapy for prostate cancer.前列腺癌的聚焦治疗
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Feb;50(2):757-769. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04482-7. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
8
Win ratio analysis of short-term clinical outcomes of focal therapy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for the patients with localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌患者局部治疗与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术短期临床结局的赢率分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 24;14(1):17019. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67592-8.
9
Outcomes of ablative therapy and radical treatment for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.前列腺癌消融治疗与根治性治疗的结果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Mar 3;50(3):237-49. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0628.
10
Partial gland ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasound versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched study.高强度聚焦超声部分腺体消融术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Prostate Int. 2023 Sep;11(3):134-138. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.12.001. Epub 2022 Dec 17.