Blanchard Jessica W, Outram Simon, Tallbull Gloria, Royal Charmaine D M
Center for Applied Social Research at the University of Oklahoma (5 Partners Place, 201 Stephenson Parkway, Suite 4100, Norman, Oklahoma 73072, USA).
Center on Genomics, Race, Identity, Difference (GRID) of the Social Science Research Institute (SSRI) at Duke University (2024 West Main Street, Erwin Square Mill Building, Bay C, Suite C103, Durham, North Carolina 27705, USA).
Curr Anthropol. 2019 Oct;60(5):637-655. doi: 10.1086/705483.
Genetic ancestry testing (GAT) provides a specific type of knowledge about ancestry not previously available to the general public, prompting questions about the conditions whereby genetic articulations of ancestry present opportunities to forge new identities and social ties but also new challenges to the maintenance of existing social structures and cultural identities. The opportunities and challenges posed by GAT are particularly significant for many indigenous communities-whose histories are shaped by traumatic interactions with colonial powers and Western science-and for whom new applications of GAT may undermine or usurp long-standing community values, systems of governance, and forms of relationality. We conducted 13 focus groups with 128 participants and six in-depth, semistructured interviews with a variety of community leaders examining the perceptions of GAT within indigenous communities across Oklahoma. Our interviews and focus groups suggest that participants-through the articulation of indigeneity as experiential and relational in nature and inherently distinct from genetic notions of ancestry-resist much of the challenge presented by GAT in usurping traditional forms of identity while at the same time recognizing the utility of the technology for tracing unknown ancestry and identifying health risks in the community.
基因血统检测(GAT)提供了一种以前普通大众无法获得的关于血统的特定知识类型,引发了一些问题,即血统的基因表达在何种情况下既为塑造新身份和社会关系提供了机会,也给维持现有社会结构和文化身份带来了新挑战。GAT带来的机遇和挑战对许多土著社区尤为重要——这些社区的历史受到与殖民势力和西方科学的创伤性互动的影响——对他们来说,GAT的新应用可能会破坏或篡夺长期以来的社区价值观、治理体系和关系形式。我们与128名参与者进行了13次焦点小组讨论,并与各类社区领袖进行了6次深入的半结构化访谈,以考察俄克拉荷马州各土著社区对GAT的看法。我们的访谈和焦点小组讨论表明,参与者们——通过将本土性阐释为本质上是体验性的和关系性的,且与基因血统概念有着内在区别——抵制了GAT在篡夺传统身份形式方面带来的许多挑战,同时也认识到该技术在追溯未知血统和识别社区健康风险方面的效用。