• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个人DNA血统检测的影响。

Impacts of personal DNA ancestry testing.

作者信息

Rubanovich Caryn Kseniya, Taitingfong Riley, Triplett Cynthia, Libiger Ondrej, Schork Nicholas J, Wagner Jennifer K, Bloss Cinnamon S

机构信息

San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA.

Department of Communication, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2021 Jan;12(1):37-52. doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00481-5. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1007/s12687-020-00481-5
PMID:32789669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7846620/
Abstract

Consumer uptake of direct-to-consumer (DTC) DNA ancestry testing is accelerating, yet few empirical studies have examined test impacts on recipients despite the DTC ancestry industry being two decades old. Participants in a longitudinal cohort study of response to health-related DTC genomic testing also received personal DNA ancestry testing at no additional cost. Baseline survey data from the primary study were analyzed together with responses to an additional follow-up survey focused on the response to ancestry results. Ancestry results were generated for 3466 individuals. Of those, 1317 accessed their results, and 322 individuals completed an ancestry response survey, in other words, approximately one in ten who received ancestry testing responded to the survey. Self-reported race/ethnicity was predictive of those most likely to view their results. While 46% of survey responders (N = 147) reported their ancestry results as surprising or unexpected, less than 1% (N = 3) were distressed by them. Importantly, however, 21% (N = 67) reported that their results reshaped their personal identity. Most (81%; N = 260) planned to share results with family, and 12% (N = 39) intended to share results with a healthcare provider. Many (61%; N = 196) reported test benefits (e.g., health insights), while 12% (N = 38) reported negative aspects (e.g., lack of utility). Over half (N = 162) reported being more likely to have other genetic tests in the future. DNA ancestry testing affected individuals with respect to personal identity, intentions to share genetic information with family and healthcare providers, and the likelihood to engage with other genetic tests in the future. These findings have implications for medical care and research, specifically, provider readiness to engage with genetic ancestry information.

摘要

消费者对直接面向消费者(DTC)的DNA血统检测的接受度正在加速上升,然而,尽管DTC血统检测行业已经有二十年历史,但很少有实证研究考察过检测对接受者的影响。一项关于健康相关DTC基因组检测反应的纵向队列研究的参与者还免费接受了个人DNA血统检测。主要研究的基线调查数据与针对血统检测结果反应的额外后续调查的回复一起进行了分析。为3466人生成了血统检测结果。其中,1317人查看了他们的结果,322人完成了血统检测结果反应调查,换句话说,接受血统检测的人中约十分之一回复了调查。自我报告的种族/族裔可预测最有可能查看检测结果的人群。虽然46%的调查回复者(N = 147)报告他们的血统检测结果令人惊讶或出乎意料,但不到1%(N = 3)的人因此感到困扰。然而,重要的是,21%(N = 67)的人报告称他们的检测结果重塑了他们的个人身份。大多数人(81%;N = 260)计划与家人分享检测结果,12%(N = 39)打算与医疗服务提供者分享检测结果。许多人(61%;N = 196)报告了检测的益处(例如,对健康的深入了解),而12%(N = 38)报告了负面方面(例如,无用)。超过一半(N = 162)的人报告未来更有可能进行其他基因检测。DNA血统检测在个人身份、与家人和医疗服务提供者分享基因信息的意愿以及未来进行其他基因检测的可能性方面对个人产生了影响。这些发现对医疗护理和研究具有启示意义,特别是医疗服务提供者对基因血统信息的接受程度。

相似文献

1
Impacts of personal DNA ancestry testing.个人DNA血统检测的影响。
J Community Genet. 2021 Jan;12(1):37-52. doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00481-5. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
2
Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.消费者对直接面向消费者的个人基因组测试后与初级保健提供者互动的看法。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Apr 19;164(8):513-22. doi: 10.7326/M15-0995. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
3
Adult adoptees and their use of direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Searching for family, searching for health.成人被收养者及其对直接面向消费者的基因检测的使用:寻找家庭,寻找健康。
J Genet Couns. 2021 Feb;30(1):144-157. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1304. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
4
Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.风险业务:直接面向消费者的个人基因检测客户的风险认知与医疗服务使用情况
J Genet Couns. 2012 Jun;21(3):413-22. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9483-0. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
5
Genetic counseling following direct-to consumer genetic testing: Consumer perspectives.直接面向消费者的基因检测后的遗传咨询:消费者的观点。
J Genet Couns. 2021 Feb;30(1):329-334. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1309. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
6
Australians' perspectives on support around use of personal genomic testing: Findings from the Genioz study.澳大利亚人对围绕个人基因检测使用的支持的看法:来自Genioz研究的结果。
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):290-299. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
7
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Ancestry Testing in Clinical Encounters: Perspectives From Psychotherapy Cases.临床诊疗中面向消费者的基因族谱检测:心理治疗案例视角
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Nov 26;7(11):e23596. doi: 10.2196/23596.
8
"It's our DNA, we deserve the right to test!" A content analysis of a petition for the right to access direct-to-consumer genetic testing.“这是我们的基因,我们理应享有检测的权利!” 一项关于获取直接面向消费者的基因检测权利请愿书的内容分析。
Per Med. 2013 Sep;10(7):729-739. doi: 10.2217/pme.13.69.
9
Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing and cancer risk prediction.直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测与癌症风险预测。
Cancer J. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):293-302. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3182610e38.
10
Searching for secrets, searching for self: Childhood adversity, self-concept clarity, and the motivation to uncover family secrets through direct-to-consumer genetic testing.探寻秘密,探寻自我:童年逆境、自我概念清晰度与通过直接面向消费者的基因检测揭开家庭秘密的动机。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Jun;32(3):698-705. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1679. Epub 2023 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing owner reported and genetic breed identification reveals high concordance in a large cohort from the Dog Aging Project.比较主人报告的信息和基因品种鉴定结果发现,来自犬类衰老项目的一个大型队列中存在高度一致性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15095-5.
2
Interrogating the Value of Return of Results for Diverse Populations: Perspectives from Precision Medicine Researchers.探究不同人群结果回报的价值:精准医学研究人员的观点。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024 Apr-Jun;15(2):108-119. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2279965. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
3
Parents' Perspectives on Secondary Genetic Ancestry Findings in Pediatric Genomic Medicine.家长对儿科基因组医学中二级遗传祖先检测结果的看法。
Clin Ther. 2023 Aug;45(8):719-728. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
4
Race and Ethnic Categories: A Brief Review of Global Terms and Nomenclature.种族和族裔类别:全球术语和命名法简述
Cureus. 2023 Jul 1;15(7):e41253. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41253. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Guidelines for genetic ancestry inference created through roundtable discussions.通过圆桌讨论制定的遗传祖先推断指南。
HGG Adv. 2023 Jan 13;4(2):100178. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2023.100178. eCollection 2023 Apr 13.
6
A Study Evaluating Consumer Motivations, Perceptions, and Responses to Direct-to-Consumer Canine Genetic Test Results.一项评估消费者对面向消费者的犬类基因检测结果的动机、认知及反应的研究。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Nov 30;12(23):3360. doi: 10.3390/ani12233360.
7
Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services.家庭秘密:参与直接面向消费者的基因亲属寻找服务的体验和结果。
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Mar 3;109(3):486-497. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
8
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Prospective users' attitudes toward information about ancestry and biological relationships.直接面向消费者的基因检测:潜在用户对有关祖先和生物关系信息的态度。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 29;16(11):e0260340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260340. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
"We Don't Need a Swab in Our Mouth to Prove Who We Are": Identity, Resistance, and Adaptation of Genetic Ancestry Testing among Native American Communities.“我们无需口腔拭子来证明自己是谁”:美国原住民社区中基因族谱检测的身份认同、抵制与适应
Curr Anthropol. 2019 Oct;60(5):637-655. doi: 10.1086/705483.
2
Consumer (dis-)interest in Genetic Ancestry Testing: The roles of race, immigration, and ancestral certainty.消费者对基因族谱检测的(不)感兴趣:种族、移民和祖先确定性的作用。
New Genet Soc. 2019;38(2):165-194. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2018.1562327. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
3
Knowing something versus feeling different:The effects and non-effects of genetic ancestry on racial identity.知晓某些事与感受不同:基因血统对种族认同的影响与非影响。
New Genet Soc. 2018;37(1):44-66. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2018.1430560. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
4
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing's Red Herring: "Genetic Ancestry" and Personalized Medicine.面向消费者的基因检测的转移注意力的话题:“基因血统”与个性化医疗。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Mar 29;6:48. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00048. eCollection 2019.
5
Constructing identities: the implications of DTC ancestry testing for tribal communities.构建身份认同:直接面向消费者的血统检测对部落社区的影响。
Genet Med. 2019 Aug;21(8):1744-1750. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0429-2. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
6
A content analysis of the views of genetics professionals on race, ancestry, and genetics.对遗传学专业人员关于种族、血统和遗传学观点的内容分析。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):222-234. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1544177. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
7
A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States.一项关于美国个体对隐私和遗传信息看法的系统性文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0204417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204417. eCollection 2018.
8
Should police have access to genetic genealogy databases? Capturing the Golden State Killer and other criminals using a controversial new forensic technique.警察是否应该有权访问基因谱系数据库?利用一项有争议的新法医技术抓捕金州杀手和其他罪犯。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Oct 2;16(10):e2006906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006906. eCollection 2018 Oct.
9
Genealogy databases and the future of criminal investigation.家谱数据库与刑事调查的未来。
Science. 2018 Jun 8;360(6393):1078-1079. doi: 10.1126/science.aau1083.
10
Physician preparedness for big genomic data: a review of genomic medicine education initiatives in the United States.医生应对大型基因组数据的准备情况:美国基因组医学教育计划述评。
Hum Mol Genet. 2018 Aug 1;27(R2):R250-R258. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy170.