• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根区变暖通过诱导系统免疫来抑制番茄叶片病害。

Root zone warming represses foliar diseases in tomato by inducing systemic immunity.

机构信息

Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Research, Plant Protection Institute, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion, Israel.

School of Plant Sciences and Food Security, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Plant Cell Environ. 2021 Jul;44(7):2277-2289. doi: 10.1111/pce.14006. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1111/pce.14006
PMID:33506959
Abstract

Plants employ systemic-induced resistance as part of their defence arsenal against pathogens. In recent years, the application of mild heating has been found to induce resistance against several pathogens. In the present study, we investigated the effect of root zone warming (RZW) in promoting tomato's resistance against the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea (Bc), the hemibiotrophic bacterium Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) and the biotrophic fungus Oidium neolycopersici (On). We demonstrate that RZW enhances tomato's resistance to Bc, On and Xcv through a process that is dependent on salicylic acid and ethylene. RZW induced tomato immunity, resulting in increased defence gene expression, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ethylene output when plants were challenged, even in the absence of pathogens. Overall, the results provide novel insights into the underlying mechanisms of warming-induced immune responses against phytopathogens with different lifestyles in tomato.

摘要

植物利用系统性诱导抗性作为其防御病原体的武器库的一部分。近年来,人们发现轻度加热可以诱导植物对几种病原体产生抗性。在本研究中,我们调查了根区加热(RZW)对促进番茄抵抗坏死真菌灰葡萄孢(Bc)、半活体细菌丁香假单胞菌 pv.vesicatoria(Xcv)和活体真菌辣椒尾孢(On)的影响。我们证明,RZW 通过依赖水杨酸和乙烯的过程增强了番茄对 Bc、On 和 Xcv 的抗性。RZW 诱导番茄免疫,当植物受到挑战时,即使没有病原体,也会导致防御基因表达、活性氧(ROS)和乙烯的产生增加。总的来说,这些结果为番茄中不同生活方式的植物病原体诱导免疫反应的潜在机制提供了新的见解。

相似文献

1
Root zone warming represses foliar diseases in tomato by inducing systemic immunity.根区变暖通过诱导系统免疫来抑制番茄叶片病害。
Plant Cell Environ. 2021 Jul;44(7):2277-2289. doi: 10.1111/pce.14006. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
Cytokinin response induces immunity and fungal pathogen resistance, and modulates trafficking of the PRR LeEIX2 in tomato.细胞分裂素反应诱导免疫和真菌病原体抗性,并调节番茄中 PRR LeEIX2 的运输。
Mol Plant Pathol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1287-1306. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12978. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
Priming of Immune System in Tomato by Treatment with Low Concentration of L-Methionine.用低浓度 L-蛋氨酸处理番茄以启动免疫系统。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jun 7;25(12):6315. doi: 10.3390/ijms25126315.
4
Systemic resistance to gray mold induced in tomato by benzothiadiazole and Trichoderma harzianum T39.由苯并噻二唑和哈茨木霉 T39 诱导的番茄对灰霉病的系统抗性。
Phytopathology. 2014 Feb;104(2):150-7. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-02-13-0043-R.
5
Role of dioxygenase α-DOX2 and SA in basal response and in hexanoic acid-induced resistance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants against Botrytis cinerea.双加氧酶α-DOX2和水杨酸在番茄(Solanum lycopersicum)植株对灰葡萄孢的基础反应及己酸诱导抗性中的作用
J Plant Physiol. 2015 Mar 1;175:163-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
6
Real time expression of ACC oxidase and PR-protein genes mediated by Methylobacterium spp. in tomato plants challenged with Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria.甲基杆菌属细菌介导的ACC氧化酶和病程相关蛋白基因在番茄植株中受到野油菜黄单胞菌疮痂致病变种侵染时的实时表达
J Plant Physiol. 2014 Jul 15;171(12):1064-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.03.009. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
7
Diverse responses of wild and cultivated tomato to BABA, oligandrin and Oidium neolycopersici infection.野生和栽培番茄对β-氨基丁酸、寡聚糖素及新番茄粉孢菌感染的不同反应。
Ann Bot. 2017 Mar 1;119(5):829-840. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw188.
8
Botrytis cinerea manipulates the antagonistic effects between immune pathways to promote disease development in tomato.灰葡萄孢操纵免疫途径之间的拮抗作用,促进番茄发病。
Plant Cell. 2011 Jun;23(6):2405-21. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.083394. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
9
Tomato SR/CAMTA transcription factors SlSR1 and SlSR3L negatively regulate disease resistance response and SlSR1L positively modulates drought stress tolerance.番茄SR/CAMTA转录因子SlSR1和SlSR3L负向调控抗病反应,而SlSR1L正向调节干旱胁迫耐受性。
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Oct 28;14:286. doi: 10.1186/s12870-014-0286-3.
10
Necrotrophic pathogens use the salicylic acid signaling pathway to promote disease development in tomato.坏死型病原菌利用水杨酸信号通路来促进番茄发病。
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2012 Dec;25(12):1584-93. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-07-12-0187-R.

引用本文的文献

1
Heat Stress and Plant-Biotic Interactions: Advances and Perspectives.热应激与植物-生物相互作用:进展与展望
Plants (Basel). 2024 Jul 23;13(15):2022. doi: 10.3390/plants13152022.
2
A LlWRKY33-LlHSFA4-LlCAT2 module confers resistance to in lily.一个LlWRKY33-LlHSFA4-LlCAT2模块赋予百合对(此处原文缺失具体对象)的抗性。
Hortic Res. 2023 Nov 27;11(1):uhad254. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhad254. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
infection aggravates gray mold disease caused by by manipulating the salicylic acid pathway in tomato.感染通过操纵番茄中的水杨酸途径加重了灰霉病。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jun 12;14:1196456. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1196456. eCollection 2023.
4
Combined effects of temperature and humidity on the interaction between tomato and revealed by integration of histological characteristics and transcriptome sequencing.温度和湿度对番茄与[未提及对象]相互作用的综合影响:通过组织学特征与转录组测序整合揭示
Hortic Res. 2022 Nov 21;10(2):uhac257. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac257. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Dynamin-Related Proteins Enhance Tomato Immunity by Mediating Pattern Recognition Receptor Trafficking.动力相关蛋白通过介导模式识别受体运输来增强番茄免疫力。
Membranes (Basel). 2022 Aug 1;12(8):760. doi: 10.3390/membranes12080760.
6
Water-Soluble Trichogin GA IV-Derived Peptaibols Protect Tomato Plants From Infection With Limited Impact on Plant Defenses.水溶性木霉菌素GA IV衍生的肽菌素可保护番茄植株免受感染,对植物防御的影响有限。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 May 19;13:881961. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.881961. eCollection 2022.
7
Effects of Agronomic Practices on the Severity of Sweet Basil Downy Mildew ().农艺措施对甜罗勒霜霉病严重程度的影响()。
Plants (Basel). 2021 Apr 30;10(5):907. doi: 10.3390/plants10050907.