• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前路腰大肌下入路斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术:技术说明和病例系列

Anteroinferior Psoas Technique for Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note and Case Series.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal System Degeneration and Regeneration Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2021 Apr;13(2):466-473. doi: 10.1111/os.12890. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1111/os.12890
PMID:33507614
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7957387/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present paper was to evaluate cases of lumbar degenerative diseases treated with oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) using a modified lateral approach (i.e. anteroinferior psoas exposure under direct vision) and to analyze the effect and safety of this approach.

METHODS

From June 2016 to April 2019, a total of 226 patients with an average age of 65.5 ± 16.2 years (98 men and 128 women) with degenerative lumbar diseases who underwent the AIP approach of OLIF were followed up and analyzed retrospectively. Data concerning operative and clinical parameters were collected, including operative time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, duration of postoperative hospital stay, and time to ambulation after surgery. For the assessment of clinical outcomes, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score (for back pain) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) were calculated. Complications were also recorded as surgical exposure approach-related complications. More than 6 months after surgery, 132 patients consented to having MRI examinations to evaluate the psoas muscle atrophy when they were followed up.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 82.5 ± 31.6 min. The mean operative time for each segment of OLIF was 43.3 ± 15.5 min. The mean blood loss was 48.0 ± 11.6 mL. The mean blood loss for each segment of OLIF was 25.3 ± 10.1 mL. No patients needed blood transfusion intraoperatively or postoperatively. The mean hospital stay was 4.1 ± 2.1 days. All patients were followed up for 12-31 months (mean 18.2 months). Clinical assessment showed that the VAS and ODI scores at 6 months after surgery were markedly lower than the preoperative scores (P < 0.001) but did not differ from the scores at the final follow-up (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in percentage changes of the cross-sectional area of the lean psoas muscle and the T2 signal intensity ratio of gross psoas to quadratus lumborum muscles between the left side (operative side) and the right side (nonoperative side) (P > 0.05). A total of 11 surgical exposure approach-related complications were reported, with an incidence of 4.9%: transient thigh pain/numbness, psoas weakness (2.2%), sympathetic chain injury (1.3%), cage subsidence (0.9%), and segmental artery injury (0.4%). There was no permanent motor neurological deficit, and no injury of vascular, ureter or peritoneal membranes.

CONCLUSION

The anteroinferior psoas approach for OLIF is safe and can preserve the psoas and lumbar plexus.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估采用改良侧前方入路(即直接可视下前路经腰大肌入路)治疗腰椎退行性疾病的病例,并分析该入路的效果和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析 2016 年 6 月至 2019 年 4 月采用改良侧前方入路行斜外侧椎间融合术(OLIF)治疗的 226 例平均年龄 65.5±16.2 岁(男 98 例,女 128 例)腰椎退行性疾病患者的临床资料。收集手术和临床参数,包括手术时间、术中估计失血量、术后住院时间和术后下床时间。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)(腰痛)和 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)评估临床疗效。记录并发症,包括手术暴露相关并发症。术后 6 个月以上,132 例患者在随访时同意进行 MRI 检查以评估腰大肌萎缩情况。

结果

手术时间平均为 82.5±31.6min。OLIF 每节段的手术时间平均为 43.3±15.5min。术中出血量平均为 48.0±11.6mL。OLIF 每节段的术中出血量平均为 25.3±10.1mL。术中及术后均无需输血。平均住院时间为 4.1±2.1 天。所有患者均获得 12-31 个月(平均 18.2 个月)随访。临床评估显示,术后 6 个月时 VAS 和 ODI 评分明显低于术前(P<0.001),但与末次随访时无差异(P>0.05)。左侧(手术侧)和右侧(非手术侧)腰大肌横截面积百分比变化和腰大肌与竖脊肌 T2 信号强度比无显著差异(P>0.05)。共报告 11 例手术暴露相关并发症,发生率为 4.9%:短暂大腿疼痛/麻木、腰大肌无力(2.2%)、交感神经链损伤(1.3%)、融合器下沉(0.9%)和节段性动脉损伤(0.4%)。无永久性运动神经功能缺损,也无血管、输尿管或腹膜损伤。

结论

OLIF 前路经腰大肌入路安全,可保留腰大肌和腰丛。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4d/7957387/748106aec0ad/OS-13-466-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4d/7957387/3e0e691a5b87/OS-13-466-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4d/7957387/a540d0056b9c/OS-13-466-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4d/7957387/748106aec0ad/OS-13-466-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4d/7957387/3e0e691a5b87/OS-13-466-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4d/7957387/a540d0056b9c/OS-13-466-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4d/7957387/748106aec0ad/OS-13-466-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Anteroinferior Psoas Technique for Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note and Case Series.前路腰大肌下入路斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术:技术说明和病例系列
Orthop Surg. 2021 Apr;13(2):466-473. doi: 10.1111/os.12890. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
2
[Comparison of clinical effect and muscle injury imaging between oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗单节段退变性腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及肌肉损伤影像学比较
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2023 May 25;36(5):420-7. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.05.005.
3
The anterior-to-psoas approach for interbody fusion at the L5-S1 segment: clinical and radiological outcomes.前路腰大肌前方入路行 L5-S1 节段椎体间融合:临床与影像学结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E14. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20335.
4
Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a meta-analysis.斜外侧椎间融合术与侧路腰椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病的影像学和临床结果差异:荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Dec 4;20(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2972-7.
5
Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1-L5 (OLIF25) and at L5-S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates.L1-L5节段(OLIF25)和L5-S1节段(OLIF51)斜外侧椎间融合术的技术描述及并发症与融合率评估
Spine J. 2017 Apr;17(4):545-553. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.026. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
6
Application of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis in Adults.斜外侧椎间融合术在成人腰椎结核治疗中的应用。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Jun;13(4):1299-1308. doi: 10.1111/os.12955. Epub 2021 May 6.
7
Psoas weakness following oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery: a prospective observational study with an isokinetic dynamometer.斜外侧椎间融合术后腰大肌无力:一项使用等速测力计的前瞻性观察研究。
Spine J. 2022 Dec;22(12):1990-1999. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.091. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
8
The technical note and approach related complications of modified lateral lumbar interbody fusion.改良外侧腰椎间融合术的技术说明及相关并发症。
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Aug;66:182-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 10.
9
Lumbar degenerative disease after oblique lateral interbody fusion: sagittal spinopelvic alignment and its impact on low back pain.腰椎退行性疾病后路斜外侧椎间融合术后:矢状位脊柱骨盆参数及其对下腰痛的影响。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 14;15(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01837-w.
10
Neuro-navigation assisted pre-psoas minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion (MI-OLIF): New roads and impediments.神经导航辅助前路经腹微创腰椎间融合术(MI-OLIF):新路与阻碍。
Neurol India. 2019 May-Jun;67(3):803-812. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.263262.

引用本文的文献

1
Early radiological adjacent segment changes following L4/5 fusion: a retrospective comparative study of oblique lateral interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.L4/5融合术后早期影像学相邻节段变化:斜外侧椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的回顾性比较研究
PeerJ. 2025 Aug 21;13:e19918. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19918. eCollection 2025.
2
Advantages of a new improved oblique Retractor in oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study.新型改良斜向牵开器在斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术中的优势:一项回顾性研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jun 10;20(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05992-w.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Complications Associated With Minimally Invasive Anterior to the Psoas (ATP) Fusion of the Lumbosacral Spine.腰荐部前路(ATP)融合术相关的并发症。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Oct 1;44(19):E1122-E1129. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003071.
2
Complications for minimally invasive lateral interbody arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing prepsoas and transpsoas approaches.微创外侧椎间融合术的并发症:一项比较腰大肌前入路和经腰大肌入路的系统评价与Meta分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Jan 25;30(4):446-460. doi: 10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18800. Print 2019 Apr 1.
3
Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review.
Effect of spinal orthosis on clinical outcomes of patients after oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a randomized controlled trial study protocol.
脊柱支具对斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术后患者临床结局的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Dec 4;24(1):787. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07796-x.
4
Comparison of mini-open, anteroinferior psoas approach and mini-open, direct lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar burst fractures: A retrospective cohort study.微创前路、腰大肌前下入路与微创直接外侧经腰大肌入路治疗腰椎爆裂骨折的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 14;9:995410. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.995410. eCollection 2022.
5
Incidence of major and minor vascular injuries during lateral access lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a retrospective comparative study and systematic literature review.外侧入路腰椎体间融合术期间主要和次要血管损伤的发生率:回顾性对比研究和系统文献复习。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Apr;45(2):1275-1289. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01699-8. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
微创前路、外侧及斜行腰椎椎间融合术:文献综述
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Mar;6(6):104. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.24.
4
Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Historical Overview and a Future Perspective.腰椎体间融合术:历史回顾与未来展望。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Aug;43(16):1161-1168. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002534.
5
Stereotactic navigation for the prepsoas oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion: technical note and case series.腰大肌斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术的立体定向导航:技术说明与病例系列
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E14. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17168.
6
Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1-L5 (OLIF25) and at L5-S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates.L1-L5节段(OLIF25)和L5-S1节段(OLIF51)斜外侧椎间融合术的技术描述及并发症与融合率评估
Spine J. 2017 Apr;17(4):545-553. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.026. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
7
Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.腰椎椎间融合术:技术、适应证以及椎间融合选择的比较,包括后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)、改良经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MI-TLIF)、斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术/前斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF/ATP)、侧方腰椎椎间融合术(LLIF)和前路腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF)
J Spine Surg. 2015 Dec;1(1):2-18. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05.
8
Lower Lumbar Segmental Arteries Can Intersect Over the Intervertebral Disc in the Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Approach With a Risk for Arterial Injury: Radiological Analysis of Lumbar Segmental Arteries by Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.在斜外侧椎间融合术式中,下腰椎节段动脉可在椎间盘上方交叉,存在动脉损伤风险:利用磁共振成像对腰椎节段动脉进行影像学分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Feb;42(3):135-142. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001700.
9
Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs: an MRI study.通向L2-S1椎间盘的腹膜后斜行通道:一项MRI研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Feb;24(2):248-255. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.SPINE13976. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
10
Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术与腰椎外侧椎体间融合术并发症发生率的比较:文献系统综述
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E4. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15278.